World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
50
Citations
6605
World Ranking
3501
National Ranking
391

Andrew C. Coward publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Coward sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 136 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Andrew C. Coward D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Coward sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew C. Coward is affiliated with the National Oceanography Centre in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant contributions in global and planetary change, oceanography, atmospheric science, environmental chemistry, and geology. The scientist's work spans numerous topics related to climate variability and models, oceanographic and atmospheric processes, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, marine and coastal ecosystems, meteorological phenomena and simulations, methane hydrates, and polar ice dynamics.

The following are notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew C. Coward:

  • The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in High-Resolution Models, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Sensitivity of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to Model Resolution in CMIP6 HighResMIP Simulations and Implications for Future Changes, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Spin-up of UK Earth System Model 1 (UKESM1) for CMIP6, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 historical simulations, 2021, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Future Evolution of an Eddy Rich Ocean Associated with Enhanced East Atlantic Storminess in a Coupled Model Projection, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters

Andrew C. Coward has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Yevgeny Aksenov
  • Stefanie Rynders
  • Malcolm Roberts
  • Andrew Yool
  • A. J. George Nurser

The frequent venues where their work appears include:

  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Ocean Modelling
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans

Best Publications

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;David Bailey;Erik Behrens

  • Description of the resolution hierarchy of the global coupled HadGEM3-GC3.1 model as used in CMIP6 HighResMIP experiments

    Malcolm J. Roberts;Alex Baker;Ed W. Blockley;Daley Calvert

  • The North Atlantic subpolar circulation in an eddy-resolving global ocean model

    Alice Marzocchi;Joël J.-M. Hirschi;N. Penny Holliday;Stuart A. Cunningham;Stuart A. Cunningham

  • The Arctic Circumpolar Boundary Current

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;A. J. George Nurser;Sheldon Bacon

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;Who M. Kim;Erik Behrens

  • The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in High-Resolution Models

    Joël J.‐M. Hirschi;Bernard Barnier;Claus W. Böning;Arne Biastoch

  • What controls primary production in the Arctic Ocean? Results from an intercomparison of five general circulation models with biogeochemistry

    Ekaterina E. Popova;Andrew Yool;Andrew C. Coward;Frederic Dupont

  • Eddy-permitting ocean circulation hindcasts of past decades

    Bernard Barnier;Laurent Brodeau;Julien Le Sommer;Jean-Marc Molines

  • Control of primary production in the Arctic by nutrients and light: insights from a high resolution ocean general circulation model

    E. E. Popova;A. Yool;A. C. Coward;Y. K. Aksenov

  • Sensitivity of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to Model Resolution in CMIP6 HighResMIP Simulations and Implications for Future Changes

    Malcolm J. Roberts;Laura C. Jackson;Christopher D. Roberts;Virna Meccia

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes

    Mehmet Ilıcak;Helge Drange;Helge Drange;Qiang Wang;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • A Multiprocessor Ocean General Circulation Model Using Message Passing

    David J. Webb;Andrew C. Coward;Beverly A. de Cuevas;Catherine S. Gwilliam

  • Rapid sea-level rise along the Antarctic margins in response to increased glacial discharge

    Craig D. Rye;Alberto C. Naveira Garabato;Paul R. Holland;Michael P. Meredith;Michael P. Meredith

  • The Fram atlas of the Southern Ocean

    David J. Webb;Peter D. Killworth;Andrew C. Coward;Simon R. Thompson

  • Arctic pathways of Pacific Water: Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison experiments

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Michael Karcher;Andrey Proshutinsky;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • The North Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Ocean: High-resolution model study

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Sheldon Bacon;Andrew C. Coward;A.J. George Nurser

  • From global to regional and back again: common climate stressors of marine ecosystems relevant for adaptation across five ocean warming hotspots

    Ekaterina Popova;Andrew Yool;Valborg Byfield;Kevern Cochrane

  • Structure and variability of the boundary current in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean

    Andrey V. Pnyushkov;Igor V. Polyakov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Yevgeny Aksenov

  • Earth's energy imbalance since 1960 in observations and CMIP5 models

    Doug M. Smith;Richard P. Allan;Andrew C. Coward;Rosie Eade

  • Circulation of the Pacific Ocean seen in a global ocean model: Ocean Circulation and Climate Advanced Modelling project (OCCAM)

    Peter M. Saunders;Andrew C. Coward;Beverly A. de Cuevas

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part I: Sea ice and solid freshwater

    Qiang Wang;Mehmet Ilicak;Rüdiger Gerdes;Helge Drange

Frequent Co-Authors

Yevgeny Aksenov
Yevgeny Aksenov National Oceanography Centre
Sheldon Bacon
Sheldon Bacon National Oceanography Centre
A. J. George Nurser
A. J. George Nurser National Oceanography Centre
Gurvan Madec
Gurvan Madec Sorbonne University
Arne Biastoch
Arne Biastoch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Bablu Sinha
Bablu Sinha National Oceanography Centre
Claus W. Böning
Claus W. Böning GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Simona Masina
Simona Masina Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
Andrew Yool
Andrew Yool National Oceanography Centre
Vladimir Ivanov
Vladimir Ivanov Lomonosov Moscow State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary careers. Students interested in combining environmental knowledge with information management might consider if is library science a good career, as it offers opportunities to organize and curate scientific data crucial for research and education.

For creatives, an online degree in photography can complement Earth Science by enhancing skills in documenting natural phenomena, which is valuable in scientific communication and media.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science-related fields might find tailored support in online photography degrees for veterans, providing flexible learning options that merge technical expertise with environmental observation.

Additionally, language skills are increasingly important in global Earth Science careers. Pursuing one of the short spanish degrees online offers quick, cost-effective language training that can enhance communication in diverse research environments and international collaborations.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C. Coward

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles