World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4958
World Ranking
6895
National Ranking
710

Yevgeny Aksenov publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yevgeny Aksenov sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 172 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Yevgeny Aksenov D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yevgeny Aksenov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Ekaterina E. Popova;Andrew Yool;A.J. George Nurser

  • Seasonal Arctic sea ice forecasting with probabilistic deep learning.

    Tom R. Andersson;J. Scott Hosking;J. Scott Hosking;María Pérez-Ortiz;Brooks Paige;Brooks Paige

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition

    Unknown

  • The Arctic Circumpolar Boundary Current

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;A. J. George Nurser;Sheldon Bacon

  • UK Global Ocean GO6 and GO7: a traceable hierarchy of model resolutions

    David Storkey;Adam T. Blaker;Pierre Mathiot;Pierre Mathiot;Alex Megann

  • A year-round satellite sea-ice thickness record from CryoSat-2

    Unknown

  • Arctic sea surface height variability and change from satellite radar altimetry and GRACE, 2003-2014

    Thomas W. K. Armitage;Sheldon Bacon;Andy L. Ridout;Sam F. Thomas

  • Control of primary production in the Arctic by nutrients and light: insights from a high resolution ocean general circulation model

    E. E. Popova;A. Yool;A. C. Coward;Y. K. Aksenov

  • GO5.0: The joint NERC-Met Office NEMO global ocean model for use in coupled and forced applications

    A.P. Megann;D. Storkey;Y. Aksenov;S. Alderson

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes

    Mehmet Ilıcak;Helge Drange;Helge Drange;Qiang Wang;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • Arctic pathways of Pacific Water: Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison experiments

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Michael Karcher;Andrey Proshutinsky;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • The Arctic Ocean in summer: A quasi‐synoptic inverse estimate of boundary fluxes and water mass transformation

    Takamasa Tsubouchi;Sheldon Bacon;A. C. Naveira Garabato;Yevgeny Aksenov

  • The North Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Ocean: High-resolution model study

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Sheldon Bacon;Andrew C. Coward;A.J. George Nurser

  • Structure and variability of the boundary current in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean

    Andrey V. Pnyushkov;Igor V. Polyakov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Yevgeny Aksenov

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part II: Liquid freshwater

    Qiang Wang;Mehmet Ilicak;Rüdiger Gerdes;Helge Drange

  • Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of Arctic sea ice thickness simulated by Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project models

    Mark Andrew Johnson;Andrey Y. Proshutinsky;Yevgeny Aksenov;An T Nguyen

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part I: Sea ice and solid freshwater

    Qiang Wang;Mehmet Ilicak;Rüdiger Gerdes;Helge Drange

  • NEMO–ICB (v1.0): interactive icebergs in the NEMO ocean model globally configured at eddy-permitting resolution

    R. Marsh;V.O. Ivchenko;N. Skliris;S. Alderson

  • Impact of sea ice floe size distribution on seasonal fragmentation and melt of Arctic sea ice

    Adam W. Bateson;Daniel L. Feltham;David Schröder;Lucia Hosekova

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse educational and career options. Many students and professionals seek flexible learning paths, which is why programs offering one year degrees for seniors have become increasingly popular. These accelerated courses help individuals quickly gain industry-relevant skills without a lengthy time commitment.

For those interested in the intersection of environmental research and information management, pursuing an online MLIS programs accredited ALA provides a solid foundation for careers in library and information science. Understanding what is library science is crucial, as it combines data organization with digital knowledge management, skills highly valuable in managing scientific databases and archives.

Additionally, Earth Science students often benefit from creative visualization skills. Enrolling in photography colleges online can enhance their ability to document geological features and environmental changes effectively, boosting both research and communication capabilities.

Recently Published Articles