World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5421
World Ranking
13027
National Ranking
116

Adam Jatowt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Jatowt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 314 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Adam Jatowt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Jatowt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Jatowt is affiliated with the University of Innsbruck in Austria and specializes primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research contributions are especially prominent in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, including:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of Adam Jatowt's work. These include:

  • "Survey of Post-OCR Processing Approaches" (2021), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Citation recommendation: approaches and datasets" (2020), published in Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • "An Investigation of SMOTE based Methods for Imbalanced Datasets with Data Complexity Analysis" (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • "A Survey on Multi-modal Summarization" (2023), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Joint event extraction along shortest dependency paths using graph convolutional networks" (2020), published in Knowledge-Based Systems

Frequent collaborators include Ricardo Campos, Antoine Doucet, Alípio Jorge, Abdelrahman Abdallah, and Sumit Bhatia, reflecting a network of sustained co-authorship engagements.

Adam Jatowt has published extensively in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), ACM SIGIR Forum, International Journal on Digital Libraries, and IEEE Access.

The scientist has also contributed to several book publications, primarily with Springer Science+Business Media. Notable titles include multiple editions of "Neural Information Processing" (2023) and "Computational approaches to semantic change (Volume 6)" (2021), published by BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).

Best Publications

  • YAKE! Keyword extraction from single documents using multiple local features

    Ricardo Campos;Vítor Mangaravite;Arian Pasquali;Alípio Jorge

  • Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications

    Ricardo Campos;Gaël Dias;Alípio M. Jorge;Adam Jatowt

  • Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web

    Yusuke Yanbe;Adam Jatowt;Satoshi Nakamura;Katsumi Tanaka

  • Survey of Post-OCR Processing Approaches

    Thi Tuyet Hai Nguyen;Adam Jatowt;Mickael Coustaty;Antoine Doucet

  • YAKE! Collection-Independent Automatic Keyword Extractor

    Ricardo Campos;Vítor Mangaravite;Arian Pasquali;Alípio Mário Jorge

  • Citation recommendation: approaches and datasets

    Michael Färber;Adam Jatowt

  • A framework for analyzing semantic change of words across time

    Adam Jatowt;Kevin Duh

  • Survey of Computational Approaches to Lexical Semantic Change

    Nina Tahmasebi;Lars Borin;Adam Jatowt

  • Studying how the past is remembered: towards computational history through large scale text mining

    Ching-man Au Yeung;Adam Jatowt

  • A Text Feature Based Automatic Keyword Extraction Method for Single Documents

    Ricardo Campos;Vítor Mangaravite;Arian Pasquali;Alípio Mário Jorge

  • Trustworthiness analysis of web search results

    Satoshi Nakamura;Shinji Konishi;Adam Jatowt;Hiroaki Ohshima

  • An Investigation of SMOTE Based Methods for Imbalanced Datasets With Data Complexity Analysis

    Unknown

  • Survey of Computational Approaches to Diachronic Conceptual Change.

    Nina Tahmasebi;Lars Borin;Adam Jatowt

  • A Survey on Multi-modal Summarization.

    Anubhav Jangra;Adam Jatowt;Sriparna Saha;Mohammad Hasanuzzaman

  • Estimating document focus time

    Adam Jatowt;Ching-Man Au Yeung;Katsumi Tanaka

  • Deep statistical analysis of OCR errors for effective post-OCR processing

    Thi-Tuyet-Hai Nguyen;Adam Jatowt;Mickael Coustaty;Nhu-Van Nguyen

  • Identifying breakthrough scientific papers

    Pavel Savov;Adam Jatowt;Radoslaw Nielek

  • Extracting collective expectations about the future from large text collections

    Adam Jatowt;Ching-man Au Yeung

  • Multi-hop Question Answering

    Unknown

  • Neural Machine Translation with BERT for Post-OCR Error Detection and Correction

    Thi Tuyet Hai Nguyen;Adam Jatowt;Nhu-Van Nguyen;Mickael Coustaty

  • The Past is Not a Foreign Country : Detecting Semantically Similar Terms across Time

    Yating Zhang;Adam Jatowt;Sourav S. Bhowmick;Katsumi Tanaka

  • Overview of NTCIR-11 Temporal Information Access (Temporalia) Task

    Hideo Joho;Adam Jatowt;Roi Blanco;Hajime Naka

  • Annotating and Analyzing Biased Sentences in News Articles using Crowdsourcing

    Sora Lim;Adam Jatowt;Michael Färber;Masatoshi Yoshikawa

Frequent Co-Authors

Katsumi Tanaka
Katsumi Tanaka Kyoto University
Sourav S. Bhowmick
Sourav S. Bhowmick Nanyang Technological University
Mitsuru Ishizuka
Mitsuru Ishizuka University of Tokyo
Carlos Castillo
Carlos Castillo Pompeu Fabra University
Joemon M. Jose
Joemon M. Jose University of Glasgow
Xiaofang Zhou
Xiaofang Zhou Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Antal van den Bosch
Antal van den Bosch Radboud University
Ee-Peng Lim
Ee-Peng Lim Singapore Management University
Min Zhang
Min Zhang Tsinghua University
James Caverlee
James Caverlee Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens multiple educational pathways for students. These pathways range from entry-level associate degrees to advanced master's programs, each offering diverse online options to fit different needs and backgrounds.

For those just starting their journey, online associate degree programs offer accessible and flexible routes to foundational knowledge in computer science. They can help you enter the tech workforce or continue toward a bachelor’s degree.

If affordability is a priority, researching cheap online colleges can help you obtain quality education without accruing significant debt. These institutions provide rigorous courses at lower tuition rates.

For students seeking graduate education, many universities feature online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, making higher education more accessible regardless of past academic challenges.

Additionally, there is strong demand for specialized skills. Pursuing degrees from the list of most in demand masters degrees can boost your career prospects in today’s competitive tech job market.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Jatowt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles