World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 36 2533 2371 904 802 160 5222

Yin Lu Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yin Lu Young between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yin Lu Young published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2010. 1 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2010. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
2000 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yin Lu Young: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 7
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 9
2008 5
2009 14
2010 17
2011 9
2012 17
2013 15
2014 6
2015 5
2016 7
2017 6
2018 10
2019 8
2020 10
2021 4
2022 6
2023 3
2024 0
2025 1
Total 168
Download as CSV

Yin Lu Young publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yin Lu Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 160 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132 160
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Yin Lu Young D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yin Lu Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139 36
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Yin Lu Young is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a significant number of contributions in computational mechanics and mechanics of materials. Their work further encompasses ocean engineering, control and systems engineering, and aerospace engineering as subfields of study.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to fluid dynamics simulations and interactions, cavitation phenomena in pumps, fluid dynamics and vibration analysis, vibration and dynamic analysis, ship hydrodynamics and maneuverability, computational fluid dynamics and aerodynamics, and combustion and detonation processes.

Yin Lu Young's recent papers include the following:

  • The influence of fluid-structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a flexible hydrofoil. Part 02., 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • The influence of fluid-structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a stiff hydrofoil. Part 1., 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • 3-D high-fidelity hydrostructural optimization of cavitation-free composite lifting surfaces, 2021, Composite Structures
  • The influence of fluid-structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a rigid and a flexible hydrofoil. Part 3, 2022, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • A control scheme for 360°thrust vectoring of cycloidal propellers with forward speed, 2022, Ocean Engineering

Frequent co-authors working alongside Young include Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Yingqian Liao, S.M. Smith, James A. Venning, and BW Pearce.

The main venues where Young has published contributions consist of:

  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • Composite Structures
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Preprints.org
  • Journal of Fluids and Structures

Best Publications

  • Fluid–structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers

    Y.L. Young

  • Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation of Unsteady Structure of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation

    Baoling Huang;Yin L. Young;Guoyu Wang;Wei Shyy

  • Hydroelastic response and energy harvesting potential of flexible piezoelectric beams in viscous flow

    Deniz Tolga Akcabay;Yin Lu Young

  • Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propulsors

    Y.L. Young

  • Utilizing fluid-structure interactions to improve energy efficiency of composite marine propellers in spatially varying wake

    M.R. Motley;Z. Liu;Y.L. Young;Y.L. Young

  • Utilization of bend–twist coupling for performance enhancement of composite marine propellers

    Zhanke Liu;Yin L. Young

  • Free vibration of cantilevered composite plates in air and in water

    Matthew R. Kramer;Zhanke Liu;Yin L. Young

  • Physical and numerical investigation of cavitating flows around a pitching hydrofoil

    Biao Huang;Biao Huang;Antoine Ducoin;Antoine Ducoin;Yin Lu Young

  • Cavity induced vibration of flexible hydrofoils

    Deniz Tolga Akcabay;Eun Jung Chae;Yin Lu Young;Antoine Ducoin;Antoine Ducoin

  • Adaptive Composite Marine Propulsors and Turbines: Progress and Challenges

    Yin Lu Young;Michael R. Motley;Ramona Barber;Eun Jung Chae

  • Hydroelastic response and stability of a hydrofoil in viscous flow

    Antoine Ducoin;Yin L. Young

  • Performance-based design and analysis of flexible composite propulsors

    Michael R. Motley;Michael R. Motley;Yin L. Young

  • Analysis of supercavitating and surface-piercing propeller flows via BEM

    Y. L. Young;Spyridon A Kinnas

  • Numerical Modeling of Unsteady Cavitating Flows around a Stationary Hydrofoil

    Antoine Ducoin;Biao Huang;Yin Lu Young

  • A BEM for the Prediction of Unsteady Midchord Face and/or Back Propeller Cavitation

    Yin L. Young;Spyridon A Kinnas

  • Reliability-based design and optimization of adaptive marine structures

    Y.L. Young;J.W. Baker;M.R. Motley

  • Three-dimensional numerical modeling of the transient fluid-structural interaction response of tidal turbines

    Yin L. Young;Michael R. Motley;Ronald W. Yeung

  • Analysis and optimization of a tethered wave energy converter in irregular waves

    Erin E. Bachynski;Yin Lu Young;Ronald W. Yeung

  • Performance Prediction of Surface-Piercing Propellers

    Yin L. Young;Spyridon A Kinnas

  • High-fidelity multipoint hydrostructural optimization of a 3-D hydrofoil

    Nitin Garg;Gaetan K.W. Kenway;Joaquim R.R.A. Martins;Yin Lu Young

  • Numerical modeling of supercavitating propeller flows

    Yin L. Young;Yin L. Young;Spyros A. Kinnas

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Ceccio
Steven L. Ceccio University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Erin Elizabeth Bachynski
Erin Elizabeth Bachynski Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Jean-Herve Prevost
Jean-Herve Prevost Princeton University
Kwok Fai Cheung
Kwok Fai Cheung University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jack W. Baker
Jack W. Baker Stanford University
Baoling Huang
Baoling Huang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Sofia D. Merajver
Sofia D. Merajver University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Emile A. Okal
Emile A. Okal Northwestern University
Ronaldo I. Borja
Ronaldo I. Borja Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the right online degree can be as varied as the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering itself. Just like understanding the type of counselors is essential in counseling, it’s crucial for students to identify which engineering specialties or complementary fields align best with their career goals.

For those interested in integrating technology with human behavior, programs like the accelerated BCBA program offer a fast track to certification, highlighting the convenience of online education while maintaining rigorous standards.

Individuals seeking flexible learning options might consider programs listed under easy counseling degree programs online, which demonstrate how diverse fields, including engineering-related disciplines, can offer accessible pathways without compromising quality.

It’s also important to consider acceptance criteria, as understanding how hard it is to get into speech pathology grad school can parallel the competitive nature of graduate engineering programs, emphasizing the need for strong preparation and academic excellence.

Best Scientists Citing Yin Lu Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles