World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
8213
World Ranking
5566
National Ranking
2032

Kwok Fai Cheung publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kwok Fai Cheung sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Kwok Fai Cheung D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kwok Fai Cheung sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - IEEE Fellow For development and implementation of energy and market management systems for control centers

Overview

Kwok Fai Cheung is a researcher affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to geophysics, oceanography, atmospheric science, earth-surface processes, and ocean engineering.

The scholar's research domains focus on earthquake and tectonic studies, geological and geochemical analysis, high-pressure geophysics and materials, ocean waves and remote sensing, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, coastal and marine dynamics, and seismic waves and analysis.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kwok Fai Cheung include Thorne Lay, Yoshiki Yamazaki, Yefei Bai, Lingling Ye, and Zhaoqing Yang. Their research has been published repeatedly in prominent venues such as Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, Renewable Energy, Nature Communications, and Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

  • The 22 July 2020 M 7.8 Shumagin seismic gap earthquake: Partial rupture of a weakly coupled megathrust (2021, Earth and Planetary Science Letters)
  • Dynamic Sea Level Variation From GNSS: 2020 Shumagin Earthquake Tsunami Resonance and Hurricane Laura (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • Rupture Model for the 29 July 2021 MW 8.2 Chignik, Alaska Earthquake Constrained by Seismic, Geodetic, and Tsunami Observations (2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth)
  • Wave energy resources assessment for the multi-modal sea state of Hawaii (2021, Renewable Energy)
  • Fast and slow intraplate ruptures during the 19 October 2020 magnitude 7.6 Shumagin earthquake (2023, Nature Communications)

Kwok Fai Cheung has been recognized with the IEEE Fellow award in 2014 for contributions involving the development and implementation of energy and market management systems for control centers.

Best Publications

  • Depth‐integrated, non‐hydrostatic model for wave breaking and run‐up

    Yoshiki Yamazaki;Zygmunt Kowalik;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • HOMOTOPY ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR PROGRESSIVE WAVES IN DEEP WATER

    Shi-Jun Liao;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • Intercomparison of wind and wave data from the ECMWF Reanalysis Interim and the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis

    Justin E. Stopa;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • Atlas of global wave energy from 10 years of reanalysis and hindcast data

    Randi A. Arinaga;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • Multiquadric Solution for Shallow Water Equations

    Yiu-Chung Hon;Kwok Fai Cheung;Xian-Zhong Mao;Edward J. Kansa

  • Boussinesq-type model for energetic breaking waves in fringing reef environments

    Volker Roeber;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • Shock-capturing Boussinesq-type model for nearshore wave processes

    Volker Roeber;Kwok Fai Cheung;Marcelo H. Kobayashi

  • Depth-integrated, non-hydrostatic model with grid nesting for tsunami generation, propagation, and runup

    Kwok Fai Cheung;Yoshiki Yamazaki

  • Modeling of tropical cyclone winds and waves for emergency management

    Amal C. Phadke;Christopher D. Martino;Kwok Fai Cheung;Samuel H. Houston

  • Assessment of wave energy resources in Hawaii

    Justin E. Stopa;Kwok Fai Cheung;Yi-Leng Chen

  • Shelf resonance and impact of near‐field tsunami generated by the 2010 Chile earthquake

    Yoshiki Yamazaki;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • Patterns and cycles in the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis wind and wave data

    Justin E. Stopa;Kwok Fai Cheung;Hendrik L. Tolman;Arun Chawla

  • Modeling near-field tsunami observations to improve finite-fault slip models for the 11 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake

    Y. Yamazaki;T. Lay;K. F. Cheung;H. Yue

  • Modeling of storm-induced coastal flooding for emergency management

    K.F. Cheung;A.C. Phadke;Y. Wei;R. Rojas

  • The 25 October 2010 Mentawai tsunami earthquake (Mw 7.8) and the tsunami hazard presented by shallow megathrust ruptures

    T. Lay;C. J. Ammon;H. Kanamori;Y. Yamazaki

  • The October 28, 2012 Mw 7.8 Haida Gwaii underthrusting earthquake and tsunami: Slip partitioning along the Queen Charlotte Fault transpressional plate boundary

    Thorne Lay;Lingling Ye;Hiroo Kanamori;Yoshiki Yamazaki

  • Tropical cyclone inundation potential on the Hawaiian Islands of Oahu and Kauai

    Andrew B. Kennedy;Joannes J. Westerink;Jane M. Smith;Mark E. Hope

  • TIME-DOMAIN SECOND-ORDER WAVE DIFFRACTION IN THREE-DIMENSIONS

    Michael Isaacson;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • Wave energy resources along the Hawaiian Island chain

    Justin E. Stopa;Jean-François Filipot;Ning Li;Kwok Fai Cheung

  • The 16 April 2016, MW 7.8 (MS 7.5) Ecuador earthquake: A quasi-repeat of the 1942 MS 7.5 earthquake and partial re-rupture of the 1906 MS 8.6 Colombia–Ecuador earthquake

    Lingling Ye;Hiroo Kanamori;Jean Philippe Avouac;Linyan Li

  • Inverse Algorithm for Tsunami Forecasts

    Yong Wei;Kwok Fai Cheung;George D. Curtis;Charles S. McCreery

Frequent Co-Authors

Thorne Lay
Thorne Lay University of California, Santa Cruz
Hiroo Kanamori
Hiroo Kanamori California Institute of Technology
Joannes J. Westerink
Joannes J. Westerink University of Notre Dame
Shijun Liao
Shijun Liao Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Charles J. Ammon
Charles J. Ammon Pennsylvania State University
Emma M. Hill
Emma M. Hill Nanyang Technological University
Kerry E Sieh
Kerry E Sieh Nanyang Technological University
Luis Rivera
Luis Rivera University of Strasbourg
Milton Garces
Milton Garces University of Hawaii at Manoa
Patrick J. Lynett
Patrick J. Lynett University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related fields that offer specialized career opportunities. For instance, professionals interested in spatial data and mapping technologies often pursue a gis degree. This expertise is crucial for analyzing environmental changes and urban planning.

For those aiming to influence public policy and lead community initiatives, online public administration programs are a great fit. Many students explore online mpa degrees to develop skills in governance, sustainability planning, and environmental regulation.

Understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues is equally important. Pursuing one of the best online bachelor degree in sociology programs can provide insights into human behavior and cultural factors that influence environmental policies.

Lastly, educators and administrators looking to advance their careers without the extensive research commitment might consider edd no dissertation programs. These degrees offer a practical approach to leadership in education and environmental advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Kwok Fai Cheung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles