World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
7135
World Ranking
8724
National Ranking
654

Adrian Rees publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Rees sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adrian Rees D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Rees sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian Rees is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom and has a research focus in the field of Neuroscience, specifically within Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Their work predominantly addresses topics related to hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, hearing loss and rehabilitation, neural dynamics and brain function, vestibular and auditory disorders, multisensory perception and integration, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, and noise effects and management.

The scientist's recent publications showcase investigations into auditory processing and neural mechanisms related to hearing and tinnitus. Notable recent papers include:

  • Motor, somatosensory, and executive cortical areas elicit monosynaptic and polysynaptic neuronal activity in the auditory midbrain (2024, Hearing Research)
  • Differences Between Self-Reported and Objectively Measured Hearing Loss at Age 61-63 Years: The Newcastle Thousand Families Birth Cohort (2023, American Journal of Audiology)
  • Nitric oxide signalling underlies salicylate-induced increases in neuronal firing in the inferior colliculus: A central mechanism of tinnitus? (2022, Hearing Research)
  • Nitric oxide signalling underlies salicylate-induced increases in neuronal firing in the inferior colliculus: a central mechanism of tinnitus? (2021, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])
  • Motor, somatosensory, and executive cortical areas directly modulate firing activity in the auditory midbrain (2023, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])

The majority of Adrian Rees's publications have appeared in venues such as Hearing Research, the American Journal of Audiology, and bioRxiv, reflecting a focus on auditory neuroscience and clinical audiology.

Frequent coauthors contributing to these research efforts include:

  • Sarah E. Gartside
  • Bas MJ Olthof
  • Dominika Lyzwa
  • Balnur Iskakova
  • Lara N. Forster

These collaborations span multiple studies related to auditory midbrain function, neuronal firing mechanisms, and hearing loss assessment. The interdisciplinary nature of the coauthor team underlines a combined expertise in neurophysiology, auditory science, and audiological clinical practice.

Best Publications

  • Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

    Philip Joris;C E Schreiner;A Rees

  • Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers

    C. Witton;J.B. Talcott;P.C. Hansen;A.J. Richardson

  • Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones

    Adrian Rees;Aage R. Møller

  • Right parietal cortex is involved in the perception of sound movement in humans.

    Timothy D. Griffiths;Geraint Rees;Adrian Rees;Gary G. R. Green

  • Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills.

    Joel B. Talcott;Caroline Witton;Maggie F. McLean;Peter C. Hansen

  • Spatial and temporal auditory processing deficits following right hemisphere infarction. A psychophysical study.

    T. D. Griffiths;A. Rees;C. Witton;P. M. Cross

  • Iontophoresis in vivo demonstrates a key role for GABA(A) and glycinergic inhibition in shaping frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus of guinea pig.

    Fiona E. N. LeBeau;Manuel S. Malmierca;Manuel S. Malmierca;Adrian Rees

  • Contribution of GABA- and glycine-mediated inhibition to the monaural temporal response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus

    F. E. N. Le Beau;A. Rees;M. S. Malmierca

  • Laminar organization of frequency-defined local axons within and between the inferior colliculi of the guinea pig

    M. S. Malmierca;A. Rees;F. E. N. Le Beau;J. G. Bjaalie

  • Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man.

    A. Rees;G.G.R. Green;R.H. Kay

  • Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise.

    Adrian Rees;Alan R. Palmer

  • The spectrum of hearing loss due to mitochondrial DNA defects

    Patrick F. Chinnery;Clive Elliott;Gary R. Green;Adrian Rees

  • Evidence for a sound movement area in the human cerebral cortex

    T. D. Griffiths;A. Rees;C. Witton;R. A. Shakir

  • Stimulus properties influencing the responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated sounds

    Adrian Rees;Aage R. Møller

  • Human brain areas involved in the analysis of auditory movement.

    Timothy D. Griffiths;Gary G. R. Green;Adrian Rees;Geraint Rees

  • Orthogonal representation of sound dimensions in the primate midbrain

    Simon Baumann;Timothy D Griffiths;Li Sun;Christopher I Petkov

  • Regularity of firing of neurons in the inferior colliculus.

    Adrian Rees;Ali Sarbaz;Manuel S. Malmierca;Fiona E. N. Le Beau

  • Intercollicular commissural projections modulate neuronal responses in the inferior colliculus

    Manuel S. Malmierca;Olga Hernández;Adrian Rees

  • The topographical organization of descending projections from the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in guinea pig

    M. S. Malmierca;F. E. N. Le Beau;A. Rees

  • Rate‐intensity functions and their modification by broadband noise for neurons in the guinea pig inferior colliculus

    Adrian Rees;Alan R. Palmer

  • Compact and easy-to-use tungsten-in-glass microelectrode manufacturing workstation.

    D. C. Bullock;A. R. Palmer;A. Rees

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy D. Griffiths
Timothy D. Griffiths University College London
Gary G. R. Green
Gary G. R. Green University of York
Manuel S. Malmierca
Manuel S. Malmierca University of Salamanca
Alan R. Palmer
Alan R. Palmer University of Nottingham
Alexander Thiele
Alexander Thiele Newcastle University
Christopher I. Petkov
Christopher I. Petkov Newcastle University
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Stefan Wermter
Stefan Wermter Universität Hamburg
Fiona E. N. LeBeau
Fiona E. N. LeBeau Newcastle University
Joel B. Talcott
Joel B. Talcott Aston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Adrian Rees

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles