World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 102 7728 7262 4021 3717 678 34280

Jonas T. Johnson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonas T. Johnson between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonas T. Johnson published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2023. 10 of the 762 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2023. 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 13 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 21 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 21 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 19 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 19 publications 1995: 29 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 41 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 56 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

762 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonas T. Johnson: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 4
1978 2
1979 3
1980 6
1981 11
1982 13
1983 8
1984 8
1985 10
1986 13
1987 21
1988 14
1989 14
1990 21
1991 18
1992 19
1993 18
1994 19
1995 29
1996 11
1997 12
1998 9
1999 9
2000 6
2001 10
2002 7
2003 10
2004 14
2005 16
2006 18
2007 27
2008 41
2009 18
2010 20
2011 23
2012 13
2013 21
2014 23
2015 15
2016 19
2017 42
2018 9
2019 3
2020 17
2021 14
2022 11
2023 56
2024 7
2025 9
2026 1
Total 762
Download as CSV

Jonas T. Johnson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas T. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 678 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 678
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonas T. Johnson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas T. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 102
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonas T. Johnson is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with notable focus on subfields such as Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Speech and Hearing.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Hip and Femur Fractures

Johnson has published extensively in journals such as:

  • The Laryngoscope
  • Head & Neck
  • Otolaryngology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Oral Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Johnson include:

  • Marci L. Nilsen
  • Dan P. Zandberg
  • Robert L. Ferris
  • Robert T. Sataloff
  • Edward Fisher

Selected recent publications demonstrate a focus on clinical applications and multidisciplinary approaches, including:

  • Clinical Utility of the Risk Analysis Index as a Prospective Frailty Screening Tool within a Multi-practice, Multi-hospital Integrated Healthcare System (2020) in Annals of Surgery
  • Transition to a virtual multidisciplinary tumor board during the COVID-19 pandemic: University of Pittsburgh experience (2020) in Head & Neck
  • Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on financial toxicity in cancer survivors (2020) in Head & Neck
  • Validation of the Risk Analysis Index for Evaluating Frailty in Ambulatory Patients (2020) in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Association of Routine Preoperative Frailty Assessment With 1-Year Postoperative Mortality (2023) in JAMA Surgery

Best Publications

  • Impact of Mutational Testing on the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Analysis of 1056 FNA Samples

    Yuri E. Nikiforov;N. Paul Ohori;Steven P. Hodak;Sally E. Carty

  • Oral pilocarpine for post-irradiation xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer.

    J T Johnson;G A Ferretti;W J Nethery;I H Valdez

  • Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers

    Vivian W.Y. Lui;Matthew L. Hedberg;Hua Li;Bhavana S. Vangara

  • Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study ☆

    Michael G Stewart;Timothy L Smith;Edward M Weaver;David L Witsell

  • A Unique Subset of CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T Cells Secreting Interleukin-10 and Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Mediates Suppression in the Tumor Microenvironment

    Laura Strauss;Christoph Bergmann;Miroslaw Szczepanski;William Gooding

  • The Extracapsular Spread of Tumors in Cervical Node Metastasis

    Johnson Jt;Barnes El;Myers En;Schramm Vl

  • Perineural Invasion in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

    Johannes J. Fagan;Bobby Collins;Leon Barnes;Frank D'Amico

  • Spontaneous apoptosis of circulating T lymphocytes in patients with head and neck cancer and its clinical importance.

    Thomas K. Hoffmann;Grzegorz Dworacki;Takashi Tsukihiro;Norbert Meidenbauer

  • Management of tumors arising in the parapharyngeal space.

    Ricardo L. Carrau;Eugene N. Myers;Jonas T. Johnson

  • Immune Monitoring of the Circulation and the Tumor Microenvironment in Patients with Regionally Advanced Melanoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab

    Ahmad A. Tarhini;Howard D Edington;Lisa H. Butterfield;Yan Lin

  • Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone?

    Barton F. Branstetter;Todd M. Blodgett;Lee A. Zimmer;Carl H. Snyderman

  • First-in-Human Trial of a STAT3 Decoy Oligonucleotide in Head and Neck Tumors: Implications for Cancer Therapy

    Malabika Sen;Sufi M. Thomas;Seungwon Kim;Joanne I. Yeh

  • The frequency and suppressor function of CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T cells in the circulation of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

    Laura Strauss;Christoph Bergmann;William Gooding;Jonas T. Johnson

  • Biology, Cytogenetics, and Sensitivity to Immunological Effector Cells of New Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Lines

    D S Heo;C Snyderman;S M Gollin;S Pan

  • Development of distant metastasis after treatment of advanced-stage head and neck cancer

    Aijaz Alvi;Jonas T. Johnson

  • Management of inverted papilloma

    Eugene N. Myers;James L. Fernau;Jonas T. Johnson;Jean Claude Tabet

  • Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing.

    Fred M. S. McConnel;Barbara Roa Pauloski;Jerilyn A. Logemann;Alfred W. Rademaker

  • Cervical lymph node metastasis after local excision of early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

    Michael J. Cunningham;Jonas T. Johnson;Eugene N. Myers;Victor L. Schramm

  • Cervical Lymph Node Metastases: Incidence and Implications of Extracapsular Carcinoma

    Johnson Jt;Myers En;Bedetti Cd;Barnes El

  • Prognostic factors in mobile tongue and floor of mouth carcinoma.

    Bert Brown;Leon Barnes;Juan Mazariegos;Floyd Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene N. Myers
Eugene N. Myers University of Pittsburgh
Robert L. Ferris
Robert L. Ferris University of Pittsburgh
Theresa L. Whiteside
Theresa L. Whiteside University of Pittsburgh
Jennifer R. Grandis
Jennifer R. Grandis University of California, San Francisco
William E. Gooding
William E. Gooding University of Pittsburgh
Richard J.H. Smith
Richard J.H. Smith University of Iowa
Carl H. Snyderman
Carl H. Snyderman University of Pittsburgh
Randal S. Weber
Randal S. Weber The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Raja R. Seethala
Raja R. Seethala University of Pittsburgh
Ronald B. Herberman
Ronald B. Herberman University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to a medical career in the USA is diverse, and many students consider related online degrees to broaden their opportunities in healthcare. For those interested in management or healthcare facilities, earning a health care administration online degree can provide essential skills in leadership and business, without the clinical focus of a traditional medical program.

Professionals looking to advance even further may pursue the most affordable online mha programs, which focus on mastering healthcare systems, policy, and organizational management. For nurses, specialized online options like the best online bsn to dnp programs prepare them for top clinical and leadership roles in nursing practice.

Another popular non-physician pathway is becoming a pharmacist. Accredited programs, such as pharmacy degree online, make this career accessible while balancing work and study. These online degrees offer flexible, affordable ways to launch or advance a career in America’s dynamic healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jonas T. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles