World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
9668
World Ranking
16209
National Ranking
6716

John Sivinski publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Sivinski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 393 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John Sivinski D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Sivinski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Sivinski is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their work is situated within the domain of agricultural research, contributing to the broader understanding and development of practices and knowledge relevant to this field.

Details about their recent academic papers, co-authors, specific fields or subfields of study, and main topics of work have not been provided. Similarly, information regarding frequent publication venues, book publications, and awards is not available.

Based on the available data, the profile of this scientist primarily reflects their institutional affiliation without further elaboration on their research output or collaborations. This suggests a focus within agricultural research without additional publicly indexed academic contributions or recognized distinctions at this time.

Best Publications

  • Hymenopteran Parasitoids on Fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera) in Latin America and the Southern United States: Diversity, Distribution, Taxonomic Status and their use in Fruit Fly Biological Control

    Sergio Ovruski;Martín Aluja;John Sivinski;Robert Wharton

  • Fruit flies : their biology, natural enemies and control

    John Sivinski

  • Hymenopterous Larval–Pupal and Pupal Parasitoids of Anastrepha Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico

    M López;M Aluja;J Sivinski

  • Behavior of flies in the genus anastrepha (trypetinae: Toxotrypanini)

    Martín Aluja;Jaime Piñero;Isabel Jácome;Francisco Díaz-Fleischer

  • Biological control of Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in mango orchards through augmentative releases of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).

    Pablo Montoya;Pablo Liedo;Betty Benrey;Jorge Cancino

  • Suppression of a Caribbean fruit fly (Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) Diptera: Tephritidae) population through augmented releases of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

    J.M. Sivinski;C.O. Calkins;R. Baranowski;D. Harris

  • Spatial and Temporal Distributions of Parasitoids of Mexican Anastrepha Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) within the Canopies of Fruit Trees

    John Sivinski;Martin Aluja;Maurilio Lopez

  • Effects of age, diet, female density, and the host resource on egg load in Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae).

    Martı́n Aluja;Francisco Dı́az-Fleischer;Daniel R Papaj;Gloria Lagunes

  • The distributions of parasitoids (Hymenoptera) of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) along an altitudinal gradient in Veracruz, Mexico

    John Sivinski;Jaime Piñero;Martin Aluja

  • Sexual selection and insect sperm.

    John Sivinski

  • Host Species and Host Plant Effects on Preference and Performance of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

    A. Eben;B. Benrey;J. Sivinski;M. Aluja

  • Fruit Flies of the Genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Associated Native Parasitoids (Hymenoptera) in the Tropical Rainforest Biosphere Reserve of Montes Azules, Chiapas, Mexico

    Martín Aluja;Juan Rull;John Sivinski;Allen L. Norrbom

  • Ovipositor Length in a Guild of Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Attacking Anastrepha spp. Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern Mexico

    John Sivinski;Kevina Vulinec;M. Aluja

  • Biological control of the Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae).

    Richard Baranowski;Holly Glenn;John Sivinski

  • Colonization and domestication of seven species of native New World hymenopterous larval-prepupal and pupal fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) parasitoids

    Martín Aluja;John Sivinski;Sergio Ovruski;Larissa Guillén

  • Parasitoids of medfly, Ceratitis capitata, and related tephritids in Kenyan coffee: a predominantly koinobiont assemblage.

    R.A. Wharton;M.K. Trostle;R.H. Messing;R.S. Copeland

  • Ecological Evidence for Diapause in Four Native and One Exotic Species of Larval-Pupal Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Parasitoids Tropical Environments

    MartíN Aluja;Maurilio López;John Sivinski

  • The effects of sterile males and two braconid parasitoids, Fopius arisanus (Sonan) and Diachasmimorpha krausii (Fullaway) (Hymenoptera), on caged populations of Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) at various sites in Guatemala.

    Pedro Rendon;John Sivinski;Tim Holler;Ken Bloem

  • Acoustic courtship signals in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew)

    J. Sivinski;T. Burk;J.C. Webb

  • Book Review: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection.

    John Sivinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Aluja
Martin Aluja Instituto de Ecología
Peter E. A. Teal
Peter E. A. Teal United States Department of Agriculture
Robert R. Heath
Robert R. Heath Agricultural Research Service
Peter J. Landolt
Peter J. Landolt Agricultural Research Service
Erik Petersson
Erik Petersson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Trevor Williams
Trevor Williams Texas A&M University
James H. Tumlinson
James H. Tumlinson Pennsylvania State University
Marjorie A. Hoy
Marjorie A. Hoy University of Florida
S. Bradleigh Vinson
S. Bradleigh Vinson Texas A&M University
David G. Hall
David G. Hall Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career options beyond traditional lab research. Many students are now opting for online programs—such as MBAs in healthcare management—to broaden their leadership and administrative skills. If you’re concerned about affordability, be sure to explore programs with the healthcare mba cost in mind.

Careers in the medical field extend into specialized roles like medical billing and coding. Earning a certification is key, and it’s important to know the differences between cpc certification and other options, including associated costs and salary potential. Certified coders, for example, can expect competitive pay; discover typical certified medical coder salary and steps for joining this in-demand field.

Some may wonder, is medical coding a dying career? Despite evolving technologies, the need for skilled coders is expected to persist, making this a stable and worthwhile option for biology or biochemistry graduates considering non-traditional roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John Sivinski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles