World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 62 1099 1009 298 261 303 13730

Kent M. Daane publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kent M. Daane between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kent M. Daane published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2011. 28 of the 321 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2011. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 13 publications
1990 2025

321 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kent M. Daane: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 0
1995 3
1996 2
1997 1
1998 5
1999 2
2000 2
2001 6
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 16
2006 12
2007 8
2008 14
2009 10
2010 13
2011 21
2012 11
2013 12
2014 14
2015 13
2016 19
2017 12
2018 13
2019 15
2020 14
2021 20
2022 13
2023 6
2024 15
2025 13
Total 321
Download as CSV

Kent M. Daane publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent M. Daane sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–305 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 303 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31 303
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Kent M. Daane D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent M. Daane sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54 62
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Insect

Kent M. Daane mainly focuses on Ecology, Mealybug, Botany, PEST analysis and Horticulture. His work on Ecology, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and Predation as part of his general Ecology study is frequently connected to Drosophila suzukii, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His Mealybug study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Vineyard, Vine and Agronomy.

His Botany study combines topics in areas such as Zoology and Parasitism. The various areas that Kent M. Daane examines in his PEST analysis study include Pest control, Agroforestry and Integrated pest management. He works mostly in the field of Horticulture, limiting it down to topics relating to Sex pheromone and, in certain cases, Pheromone and Ficus.

His most cited work include:

  • Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): a global perspective and future priorities (489 citations)
  • Olive Fruit Fly: Managing an Ancient Pest in Modern Times (207 citations)
  • Commercialization of Predators: Recent Lessons from Green Lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrosoperla) (183 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Horticulture, Ecology, Parasitoid and PEST analysis. His Fecundity research extends to the thematically linked field of Botany. His research in Horticulture intersects with topics in Overwintering and Larva.

Many of his research projects under Ecology are closely connected to Drosophila suzukii with Drosophila suzukii, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His PEST analysis research includes elements of Population density and Nymph. His Biological pest control research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Pest control and Animal ecology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (38.40%)
  • Horticulture (33.60%)
  • Ecology (26.40%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Drosophila suzukii (11.60%)
  • PEST analysis (21.60%)
  • Ecology (26.40%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Drosophila suzukii, PEST analysis, Ecology, Zoology and Parasitoid. Kent M. Daane studies Mealybug, a branch of PEST analysis. His Ecology study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Vineyard.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Fecundity and Parasitism. His Biological pest control research is classified as research in Botany. The concepts of his Botany study are interwoven with issues in Broom and Horticulture.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world (133 citations)
  • First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological agents (104 citations)
  • Population dynamics and ecology of Drosophila suzukii in Central California (72 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Insect

Drosophila suzukii, Ecology, Zoology, Parasitoid and Pupa are his primary areas of study. Drosophila suzukii is intertwined with Larva, Pteromalidae, Diapriidae, Biological pest control and Botany in his study. His studies examine the connections between Botany and genetics, as well as such issues in Inoculation, with regards to Vineyard.

His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both PEST analysis and Population density. His studies deal with areas such as Japonica and Host as well as Zoology. His studies in Parasitoid integrate themes in fields like Fecundity and Parasitism.

Best Publications

  • Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): a global perspective and future priorities

    Mark K. Asplen;Gianfranco Anfora;Antonio Biondi;Antonio Biondi;Deuk Soo Choi

  • Olive Fruit Fly: Managing an Ancient Pest in Modern Times

    Kent M. Daane;Marshall W. Johnson

  • Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae:Chrysoperla).

    Maurice J. Tauber;Catherine A. Tauber;Kent M. Daane;Kenneth S. Hagen

  • Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world

    T. Haye;P. Girod;A. G. S. Cuthbertson;X. G. Wang

  • First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological agents

    Kent M. Daane;Xin-Geng Wang;Antonio Biondi;Antonio Biondi;Betsey Miller

  • Biology and Management of Mealybugs in Vineyards

    Kent M. Daane;Rodrigo P. P. Almeida;Vaughn A. Bell;James T. S. Walker

  • Ecology and management of grapevine leafroll disease.

    Rodrigo P. P. Almeida;Kent M. Daane;Vaughn A. Bell;G. Kai Blaisdell

  • Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their natural enemies in California's coastal vineyards

    Kent M. Daane;Karen R. Sime;Julie Fallon;Monica L. Cooper

  • Mealybug transmission of Grapevine leafroll viruses: an analysis of virus-vector specificity.

    Chi-Wei Tsai;Adib Rowhani;Deborah A. Golino;Kent M. Daane

  • Attractiveness of common insectary and harvestable floral resources to beneficial insects

    Brian N. Hogg;Robert L. Bugg;Kent M. Daane

  • Integrating temperature-dependent life table data into a matrix projection model for Drosophila suzukii population estimation.

    Nik G. Wiman;Vaughn M. Walton;Daniel T. Dalton;Gianfranco Anfora

  • Sexual communication and related behaviours in Tephritidae: current knowledge and potential applications for Integrated Pest Management

    Giovanni Benelli;Kent M. Daane;Angelo Canale;Chang-Ying Niu

  • Host stage preference, efficacy and fecundity of parasitoids attacking Drosophila suzukii in newly invaded areas

    M. Valerio Rossi Stacconi;Matt Buffington;Kent M. Daane;Daniel T. Dalton

  • Biological Control of Spotted-Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae)—Current and Pending Tactics

    Jana C Lee;Xingeng Wang;Kent M Daane;Kim A Hoelmer

  • Transmission of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 by the vine mealybug (Planococcus ficus).

    C.-W. Tsai;J. Chau;L. Fernandez;D. Bosco

  • Development and optimization of methods for using sex pheromone for monitoring the mealybug Planococcus ficus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards.

    Jocelyn G. Millar;Kent M. Daane;J. Steven Mcelfresh;Jardel A. Moreira;Jardel A. Moreira

  • Seasonal Movement and Distribution of the Grape Mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae): Developing a Sampling Program for San Joaquin Valley Vineyards

    Chris A. Geiger;Kent M. Daane

  • Influence of ground cover on spider populations in a table grape vineyard

    Michael J. Costello;Kent M. Daane

  • New controls investigated for vine mealybug

    K Daane;W Bentley;Walton;R Malakar-Kuenen

  • Drosophila suzukii population response to environment and management strategies

    Nik G. Wiman;Daniel T. Dalton;Gianfranco Anfora;Antonio Biondi

  • Pheromone-based mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards.

    Vaughn M. Walton;Vaughn M. Walton;Kent M. Daane;Walter J. Bentley;Jocelyn G. Millar

  • Monitoring Planococcus ficus in South African vineyards with sex pheromone-baited traps

    Vaughn M. Walton;Kent M. Daane;Ken L. Pringle

  • Population dynamics and ecology of Drosophila suzukii in Central California

    Xin-Geng Wang;Thomas J. Stewart;Antonio Biondi;Antonio Biondi;Brandy A. Chavez

  • High Summer Temperatures Affect the Survival and Reproduction of Olive Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

    Xin-Geng Wang;Marshall W. Johnson;Kent M. Daane;Hannah Nadel

Frequent Co-Authors

Marshall W. Johnson
Marshall W. Johnson University of California, Riverside
Vaughn M. Walton
Vaughn M. Walton Oregon State University
Antonio Biondi
Antonio Biondi University of Catania
Rodrigo P. P. Almeida
Rodrigo P. P. Almeida University of California, Berkeley
Jocelyn G. Millar
Jocelyn G. Millar University of California, Riverside
Nicholas J. Mills
Nicholas J. Mills University of California, Berkeley
Gianfranco Anfora
Gianfranco Anfora University of Trento
Rufus Isaacs
Rufus Isaacs Michigan State University
Miguel A. Altieri
Miguel A. Altieri University of California, Berkeley
Frank G. Zalom
Frank G. Zalom University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kent M. Daane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles