World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
9805
World Ranking
17960
National Ranking
7349

Mark S. Hoddle publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Hoddle sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 289 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark S. Hoddle D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Hoddle sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark S. Hoddle is affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions to insect science, plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior, systematics, and genetics. The scientist's work encompasses numerous aspects of insect-plant interactions and control, insect behavior and control techniques, insect and pesticide research, insect and arachnid ecology and behavior, Hemiptera insect studies, forest insect ecology and management, and phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens.

Mark S. Hoddle has published extensively, contributing to several scientific journals and venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Biological Control
  • Journal of Economic Entomology
  • Arthropod Management Tests
  • Florida Entomologist
  • Insects

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Ivan Milosavljević
  • Francesc Gómez-Marco
  • Christina D. Hoddle
  • Nicola A. Irvin
  • Michael R. Lewis

Recent publications by Mark S. Hoddle include the following titles with publication years and venues:

  • Evaluating the potential of flowering plants for enhancing predatory hoverflies (Syrphidae) for biological control of Diaphorina citri (Liviidae) in California, 2021, Biological Control
  • Density dependent mortality, climate, and Argentine ants affect population dynamics of an invasive citrus pest, Diaphorina citri, and its specialist parasitoid, Tamarixia radiata, in Southern California, USA, 2021, Biological Control
  • Biodegradable alginate hydrogel bait delivery system effectively controls high-density populations of Argentine ant in commercial citrus, 2020, Journal of Pest Science
  • A new paradigm: proactive biological control of invasive insect pests, 2023, BioControl
  • Taxonomy, Biology, Symbionts, Omics, and Management of Rhynchophorus Palm Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Dryophthorinae), 2024, Annual Review of Entomology

Best Publications

  • Invasion biology of thrips.

    Joseph G. Morse;Mark S. Hoddle

  • Control of Pests and Weeds by Natural Enemies: An Introduction to Biological Control

    Roy G. Van Driesche;Mark Hoddle

  • Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems

    R. G. Van Driesche;R. I. Carruthers;M. S. Hoddle

  • Biological control of invasive plants in the Eastern United States.

    R. Van Driesche;B. Blossey;M. Hoddle;S. Lyon

  • BIOLOGY AND USE OF THE WHITEFLY PARASITOID ENCARSIA FORMOSA

    M. S. Hoddle;R. G. Van Driesche;J. P. Sanderson

  • Restoring Balance: Using Exotic Species to Control Invasive Exotic Species

    Mark S. Hoddle

  • Assessing fitness costs for transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing the GFP marker and transposase genes

    Nic Irvin;Mark S. Hoddle;David A. O'Brochta;Bryan Carey

  • Invasion Biology, Ecology, and Management of Western Flower Thrips.

    Stuart R. Reitz;Yulin Gao;William D.J. Kirk;Mark S. Hoddle

  • Indigenous arthropod natural enemies of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug in North America and Europe

    Paul K. Abram;Kim A. Hoelmer;Angelita Acebes-Doria;Heather Andrews

  • The potential adventive geographic range of glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata and the grape pathogen Xylella fastidiosa: implications for California and other grape growing regions of the world

    Mark S. Hoddle

  • Nuclear-mitochondrial barcoding exposes the global pest Western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) as two sympatric cryptic species in its native California.

    Paul F. Rugman-Jones;Mark S. Hoddle;Richard Stouthamer

  • Attraction of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae and Aeolothripidae) to colored sticky cards in a California avocado orchard

    Mark S Hoddle;Lindsay Robinson;David Morgan

  • The Lesser of Two Weevils: Molecular-Genetics of Pest Palm Weevil Populations Confirm Rhynchophorus vulneratus (Panzer 1798) as a Valid Species Distinct from R. ferrugineus (Olivier 1790), and Reveal the Global Extent of Both

    Paul F. Rugman-Jones;Christina D. Hoddle;Mark S. Hoddle;Richard Stouthamer

  • Parasitoid Guilds of Agrilus Woodborers (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): Their Diversity and Potential for Use in Biological Control

    Philip B. Taylor;Jian J. Duan;Roger W. Fuester;Mark Hoddle

  • Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents

    Roy G. Van Driesche;Mark Hoddle

  • Molecular Identification Key for Pest Species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)

    Paul F. Rugman-Jones;Mark S. Hoddle;Laurence A. Mound;Richard Stouthamer

  • UC scientists apply IPM techniques to new eucalyptus pests

    Timothy D. Paine;Donald L. Dahlsten;Jocelyn G. Millar;Mark S. Hoddle

  • DISTRIBUTION AND PLANT ASSOCIATION RECORDS FOR HOMALODISCA COAGULATA (HEMIPTERA: CICADELLIDAE) IN FLORIDA

    Mark S. Hoddle;Serguei V. Triapitsyn;David J. W. Morgan

  • The economic impact of Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on California avocado production

    Mark S. Hoddle;Karen M. Jetter;Joseph G. Morse

  • Control of pests and weeds by natural enemies

    Roy Van Driesche;Mark Hoddle

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Stouthamer
Richard Stouthamer University of California, Riverside
Laurence A. Mound
Laurence A. Mound Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Neil M Davies
Neil M Davies University College London
George K. Roderick
George K. Roderick University of California, Berkeley
Jocelyn G. Millar
Jocelyn G. Millar University of California, Riverside
Ashok Mulchandani
Ashok Mulchandani University of California, Riverside
Andy Gardner
Andy Gardner University of St Andrews
Michael K. Rust
Michael K. Rust University of California, Riverside
John M. Heraty
John M. Heraty University of California, Riverside
Steve D. Wratten
Steve D. Wratten Lincoln University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can lead to a variety of rewarding career opportunities in healthcare and research. Many students choose to further specialize through online degree programs that offer flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in data and patient care, a health information management online degree helps develop critical skills in health data analysis and information systems.

If nutrition science is your passion, consider earning your nutrition masters online. This path opens doors to registered dietitian roles, wellness coaching, and research positions.

Imaging technology is another growing field. Accredited sonography programs online prepare graduates to work as ultrasound technicians in clinics, hospitals, and diagnostic centers.

If you're seeking a fast track into allied health, accelerated radiology tech programs online offer hands-on training and rapid entry into radiologic technologist roles.

Each of these related online degrees complements a background in biology or biochemistry and broadens your career horizons in the dynamic U.S. healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Hoddle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles