World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
39039
World Ranking
7367
National Ranking
3855

Rodney J. Landreneau publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney J. Landreneau sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 408 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rodney J. Landreneau D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney J. Landreneau sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rodney J. Landreneau is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine with a substantial emphasis on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, reflecting a body of work that also covers Oncology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Otorhinolaryngology.

Their record includes a number of recent publications which highlight ongoing contributions to lung cancer research and surgical oncology. These papers include:

  • Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for peripheral clinical T1aN0 non-small cell lung cancer: A post hoc analysis of CALGB 140503 (Alliance), 2023, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Outcomes with segmentectomy versus lobectomy in patients with clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer, 2020, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Recurrence of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Visceral Pleural Invasion, 2024, JAMA Oncology
  • Secondary Analysis of the Rate of Second Primary Lung Cancer From Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 (Alliance) Trial of Lobar Versus Sublobar Resection for T1aN0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, 2024, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • MA03.10 Association of Surgical Margin Distance, Locoregional Recurrence, and Survival Among Patients Undergoing Sublobar Resection in CALGB140503, 2024, Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Their frequent co-authors that appear in multiple collaborations include:

  • Nasser K. Altorki
  • Bryce Damman
  • Jennifer Mentlick
  • Dennis A. Wigle
  • David R. Jones

Rodney J. Landreneau publishes primarily in the following venues:

  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • JAMA Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Investigative Medicine

The research fields of study associated with Landreneau cover:

  • Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Otorhinolaryngology

The main scientific topics addressed in Landreneau's work include:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma

    Adam J. Bass;Vesteinn Thorsson;Ilya Shmulevich;Sheila M. Reynolds

  • Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients

    James D. Luketich;Arjun Pennathur;Omar Awais;Ryan M. Levy

  • Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non–small cell carcinoma: Results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030 Trial

    Gail E. Darling;Mark S. Allen;Paul A. Decker;Karla Ballman

  • Morbidity and Mortality of Major Pulmonary Resections in Patients With Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Initial Results of the Randomized, Prospective ACOSOG Z0030 Trial

    Mark S. Allen;Gail E. Darling;Taine T.V. Pechet;John D. Mitchell

  • Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy.

    Rodney J. Landreneau;Stephen R. Hazelrigg;Michael J. Mack;Robert D. Dowling

  • Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema

    F. C. Sciurba;R. M. Rogers;R. J. Keenan;W. A. Slivka

  • Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy: A randomized trial

    Thomas J. Kirby;Michael J. Mack;Rodney J. Landreneau;Thomas W. Rice

  • MicroRNA Expression Profiles of Esophageal Cancer

    Andrew Feber;Liqiang Xi;James D. Luketich;Arjun Pennathur

  • Egr-1 Regulates Autophagy in Cigarette Smoke-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Zhi Hua Chen;Hong Pyo Kim;Hong Pyo Kim;Frank C. Sciurba;Seon Jin Lee;Seon Jin Lee

  • Video-assisted thoracic surgery: Basic technical concepts and intercostal approach strategies

    Rodney J. Landreneau;Michael J. Mack;Stephen R. Hazelrigg;Robert D. Dowling

  • Prevalence of chronic pain after pulmonary resection by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery.

    Rodney J. Landreneau;Michael J. Mack;Stephen R. Hazelrigg;Keith Naunheim

  • Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer

    Robert J Keenan;Rodney J Landreneau;Richard H Maley;Deepak Singh

  • Wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer

    Rodney J. Landreneau;David J. Sugarbaker;Michael J. Mack;Stephen R. Hazelrigg

  • Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

    Tea E. Acuff;Rodney J. Landreneau;Rodney J. Landreneau;Bartley P. Griffith;Bartley P. Griffith;Michael J. Mack;Michael J. Mack

  • Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis.

    Amgad El-Sherif;William E. Gooding;Ricardo Santos;Brian Pettiford

  • The Effect of Muscle-Sparing Versus Standard Posterolateral Thoracotomy on Pulmonary Function, Muscle Strength, and Postoperative Pain

    S. R. Hazelrigg;R. J. Landreneau;T. M. Boley;M. Priesmeyer

  • Anatomic Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Matthew J. Schuchert;Brian L. Pettiford;Samuel Keeley;Thomas A. D’Amato

  • Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

    James D. Luketich;Katie S. Nason;Neil A. Christie;Arjun Pennathur

  • Thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of the indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule

    Michael J. Mack;Stephen R. Hazelrigg;Rodney J. Landreneau;Tea E. Acuff

  • Initial experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

    Thomas J. Kirby;Thomas J. Kirby;Michael J. Mack;Michael J. Mack;Rodney J. Landreneau;Rodney J. Landreneau;Thomas W. Rice;Thomas W. Rice

Frequent Co-Authors

James D. Luketich
James D. Luketich University of Pittsburgh
Robert J. Keenan
Robert J. Keenan University of Chicago
Jill M. Siegfried
Jill M. Siegfried University of Minnesota
William E. Gooding
William E. Gooding University of Pittsburgh
Joe B. Putnam
Joe B. Putnam The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Frank C. Sciurba
Frank C. Sciurba University of Pittsburgh
David R. Jones
David R. Jones Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Samuel A. Yousem
Samuel A. Yousem University of Pittsburgh
Michael J. Mack
Michael J. Mack Scott & White Memorial Hospital
Bryan F. Meyers
Bryan F. Meyers Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your medical career options beyond traditional MD programs, several flexible online degrees and pathways are available. Many schools now offer direct entry MSN programs for non nurses online. These programs allow graduates with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to move quickly into advanced nursing roles and often lead to higher earning potential.

Students seeking a faster or more accessible route into nursing might consider direct entry nursing programs, which streamline the path to a nursing license. For those more interested in the administrative side of healthcare, you’ll find that the best online medical billing and coding schools offer robust programs—with financial aid available—for a variety of career levels.

Admission requirements can often be a barrier, but aspiring nurses can also look into lpn program no entrance exam options. These programs remove standardized entrance test obstacles, making it easier to start your nursing journey. Whatever your goals, these online pathways make healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Rodney J. Landreneau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles