World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4339
World Ranking
12729
National Ranking
622

Oliver Kopp publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Kopp sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Oliver Kopp D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Kopp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Kopp is affiliated with the University of Hamburg in Germany, focusing on several domains within computer science. Their research spans various subfields, including Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Information Systems and Management, and Software.

Their work extensively covers multiple main topics, such as Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing, Research Data Management Practices, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Software Engineering Research, Digital Transformation in Industry, Manufacturing Process and Optimization, and Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Oliver Kopp include:

  • "Model-Driven Engineering for Digital Twins: Opportunities and Challenges," 2025, published in Systems Engineering
  • "JabRef: BibTeX-based literature management software," 2023, published in TUGboat
  • "The LaTeX template generator: How micro-templates reduce template maintenance effort," 2023, published in TUGboat
  • "Assets for 'A Systematic Technology Review of General-Purpose Open-Source TOSCA Orchestrators,'" 2023, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "Datasets for a Systematic Technology Review of General-Purpose Open-Source TOSCA Orchestrators," 2023, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Oliver Kopp frequently collaborates with a core group of coauthors. These include Miles Stötzner, Steffen Becker, Lukas Harzenetter, Benjamin Weder, and Uwe Breitenbücher.

Their publications are distributed mainly across specific venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), which accounts for the majority of their contributions, TUGboat, and Systems Engineering. Additional publications appear in venues like Zpravodaj Československého sdružení uživatelů TeXu and Software Quality Journal.

Best Publications

  • BPEL4Chor: Extending BPEL for Modeling Choreographies

    G. Decker;O. Kopp;F. Leymann;M. Weske

  • OpenTOSCA --- A Runtime for TOSCA-Based Cloud Applications

    Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Florian Haupt;Oliver Kopp

  • TOSCA: Portable Automated Deployment and Management of Cloud Applications

    Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Winery --- A Modeling Tool for TOSCA-Based Cloud Applications

    Oliver Kopp;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Frank Leymann

  • A Detailed Analysis of IoT Platform Architectures: Concepts, Similarities, and Differences

    Jasmin Guth;Uwe Breitenbücher;Michael Falkenthal;Paul Fremantle

  • Combining Declarative and Imperative Cloud Application Provisioning Based on TOSCA

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Kálmán Képes;Oliver Kopp

  • Interacting services: From specification to execution

    Gero Decker;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann;Mathias Weske

  • An Introduction to Service Choreographies (Servicechoreographien – eine Einführung)

    Gero Decker;Oliver Kopp;Alistair P. Barros

  • Streamlining DevOps automation for Cloud applications using TOSCA as standardized metamodel

    Johannes Wettinger;Uwe Breitenbücher;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Modeling Service Choreographies Using BPMN and BPEL4Chor

    Gero Decker;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann;Kerstin Pfitzner

  • The Difference Between Graph-Based and Block-Structured Business Process Modelling Languages

    Oliver Kopp;Daniel Martin;Daniel Wutke;Frank Leyman

  • An Introduction to Service Choreographies

    Gero Decker;Oliver Kopp;Alistair Barros

  • Vino4TOSCA: A Visual Notation for Application Topologies Based on TOSCA

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • BPMN4TOSCA: A Domain-Specific Language to Model Management Plans for Composite Applications

    Oliver Kopp;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Frank Leymann

  • Extending BPMN for Wireless Sensor Networks

    C. Timurhan Sungur;Patrik Spiess;Nina Oertel;Oliver Kopp

  • Survey and Comparison of Open Source Time Series Databases.

    Andreas Bader;Oliver Kopp;Michael Falkenthal

  • Vinothek - A Self-Service Portal for TOSCA.

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Cross-organizational process monitoring based on service choreographies

    Branimir Wetzstein;Dimka Karastoyanova;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Analyzing BPEL4Chor: verification and participant synthesis

    Niels Lohmann;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann;Wolfgang Reisig

  • MAINTAINING DATA DEPENDENCIES ACROSS BPEL PROCESS FRAGMENTS

    Rania Khalaf;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • From event streams to process models and back: Challenges and opportunities

    Pnina Soffer;Annika Hinze;Agnes Koschmider;Holger Ziekow

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Leymann
Frank Leymann University of Stuttgart
Uwe Breitenbücher
Uwe Breitenbücher University of Stuttgart
Mathias Weske
Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute
Alistair Barros
Alistair Barros Queensland University of Technology
Wolfgang Reisig
Wolfgang Reisig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Dieter Roller
Dieter Roller University of Stuttgart
Cesare Pautasso
Cesare Pautasso Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Pnina Soffer
Pnina Soffer University of Haifa
Philippe Kruchten
Philippe Kruchten University of British Columbia
Grace A. Lewis
Grace A. Lewis Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your qualifications in computer science doesn’t have to mean years of traditional education. There are certificate programs that pay well, which can be completed in just a few months and help you quickly develop in-demand skills for high-growth tech jobs.

For those seeking advanced credentials, the shortest masters degree options online can provide specialized training and open the door to leadership roles, often in just one year. These programs are designed for flexibility, letting students balance studies with other commitments.

When considering graduate school, it’s important to look for graduate degrees that are worth it. Highly valued master’s degrees in tech can deliver strong returns on investment and set you apart in a competitive job market.

If you’re just starting out, an associate degree online provides a solid foundation and can serve as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s degree or direct entry into the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Kopp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles