World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
24148
World Ranking
1758
National Ranking
54

Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 277 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede is affiliated with Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Computer Science, with a particular focus on Management Information Systems and Information Systems. Their work also touches on Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's main topics of research include Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Data Quality and Management, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Software System Performance and Reliability, and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security.

Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede has published frequently in several venues. These include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • Information Systems
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Decision Support Systems

Frequent co-authors in their publications are Moe Thandar Wynn, Chun Ouyang, Robert Andrews, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, and Anastasiia Pika.

Recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • "Process mining for healthcare: Characteristics and challenges" (2022), published in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • "Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: incidence, patient characteristics, timing, trajectory, treatment, and associated outcomes. A multicenter, observational study" (2023), published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Privacy-Preserving Process Mining in Healthcare" (2020), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Digital Health Data Quality Issues: Systematic Review" (2023), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Quality-informed semi-automated event log generation for process mining" (2020), published in Decision Support Systems

Best Publications

  • Business process management: a survey

    Wil M. P. Van Der Aalst;Arthur H. M. Ter Hofstede;Mathias Weske

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology

    Marlon Dumas;Wil M. van der Aalst;Arthur H. ter Hofstede

  • Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support

    Nick Russell;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;David Edmond

  • Workflow data patterns: identification, representation and tool support

    Nick Russell;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;David Edmond;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • Formal semantics and analysis of control flow in WS-BPEL

    Chun Ouyang;Eric Verbeek;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Stephan Breutel

  • UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language

    Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • On the suitability of BPMN for business process modelling

    P. Wohed;W. M. P. van der Aalst;M. Dumas;A. H. M. ter Hofstede

  • What's in a Service?

    Justin O'Sullivan;David Edmond;Arthur Ter Hofstede

  • Service interaction patterns

    Alistair Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges

    Rehan Syed;Suriadi Suriadi;Michael Adams;Wasana Bandara

  • Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and its Support Environment

    Arthur Hofstede;Wil van der Aalst;Michael Adams;Nick Russell

  • Advanced Workflow Patterns

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Alistair P. Barros;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;Bartek Kiepuszewski

  • On structured workflow modelling

    Bartosz Kiepuszewski;Arthur ter Hofstede;Christoph Bussler

  • Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages: The Case of BPEL4WS

    Petia Wohed;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

  • Verification of workflow task structures: A petri-net-based approach

    Wil M.P. Van Der Aalst;Arthur H. M. Ter Hofstede

  • Design and Implementation of the YAWL System

    Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Lachlan J. Aldred;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede

  • Worklets: a service-oriented implementation of dynamic flexibility in workflows

    Michael Adams;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;David Edmond;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • Workflow exception patterns

    Nick Russell;Wil van der Aalst;Arthur ter Hofstede

  • On the suitability of UML 2.0 activity diagrams for business process modelling

    Nick Russell;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede;Petia Wohed

  • Service interaction patterns : towards a reference framework for service-based business process interconnection

    Alistair P. Barros;Marlon Dumas;Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede

Frequent Co-Authors

Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Marcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa University of Melbourne
Marlon Dumas
Marlon Dumas University of Tartu
Moe Thandar Wynn
Moe Thandar Wynn Queensland University of Technology
Michael Adams
Michael Adams University of Birmingham
Alistair Barros
Alistair Barros Queensland University of Technology
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne
Massimiliano de Leoni
Massimiliano de Leoni University of Padua
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Michael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens pathways to a variety of in-demand careers and adjacent fields. Online education makes it easier than ever to transition or expand your knowledge, whether you’re interested in technical specialties or complementary disciplines.

If you are fascinated by law, technology, and security, pursuing a criminal justice degree online can help you build a foundation for roles in cybersecurity and digital forensics. Financial skills are highly valued in tech as well, so taking accounting classes online can give you a crucial edge for IT or data-driven businesses.

Data continues to shape the world, and the top data science programs online offer flexible, advanced training for those seeking specialist roles in analytics, artificial intelligence, or machine learning. For those interested in project or operations management, a fast track construction management degree provides leadership and organizational skills that are also applicable in the tech industry.

Each of these online degrees makes it easier to switch fields or enhance your expertise, offering affordable and accelerated options to match your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles