World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
7174
World Ranking
13378
National Ranking
479

Davide Cozzolino publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Davide Cozzolino sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Davide Cozzolino D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Davide Cozzolino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Davide Cozzolino is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Other notable areas of study include Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biophysics.

The main topics covered in their work include Digital Media Forensic Detection, Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques, Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis, Speech and Audio Processing, Advanced Image Processing Techniques, Cell Image Analysis Techniques, and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques.

They have published extensively with numerous papers featured in well-known venues. Some frequent publication venues for their work are arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), IEEE Security & Privacy, Remote Sensing, and the 2021 International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP).

Recent papers include:

  • Nonlocal CNN SAR Image Despeckling, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Towards Universal GAN Image Detection, 2021, 2021 International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)
  • ID-Reveal: Identity-aware DeepFake Video Detection, 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Frequent coauthors working alongside them include Luisa Verdoliva, Giovanni Poggi, Riccardo Corvi, Koki Nagano, and Fabrizio Guillaro.

Best Publications

  • FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images

    Andreas Rossler;Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva;Christian Riess

  • Pansharpening by Convolutional Neural Networks

    Giuseppe Masi;Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva;Giuseppe Scarpa

  • FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images

    Andreas Rössler;Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva;Christian Riess

  • Efficient Dense-Field Copy–Move Forgery Detection

    Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Noiseprint: A CNN-Based Camera Model Fingerprint

    Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva

  • FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces

    Andreas Rössler;Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva;Christian Riess

  • Detection of GAN-Generated Fake Images over Social Networks

    Francesco Marra;Diego Gragnaniello;Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Recasting Residual-based Local Descriptors as Convolutional Neural Networks: an Application to Image Forgery Detection

    Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Target-Adaptive CNN-Based Pansharpening

    Giuseppe Scarpa;Sergio Vitale;Davide Cozzolino

  • SAR image despeckling through convolutional neural networks

    G. Chierchia;D. Cozzolino;G. Poggi;L. Verdoliva

  • Splicebuster: A new blind image splicing detector

    Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi;Luisa Verdoliva

  • ForensicTransfer: Weakly-supervised Domain Adaptation for Forgery Detection

    Davide Cozzolino;Justus Thies;Andreas Rössler;Christian Riess

  • Fast Adaptive Nonlocal SAR Despeckling

    Davide Cozzolino;Sara Parrilli;Giuseppe Scarpa;Giovanni Poggi

  • Copy-move forgery detection based on PatchMatch

    Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Single-image splicing localization through autoencoder-based anomaly detection

    Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva

  • A PatchMatch-Based Dense-Field Algorithm for Video Copy–Move Detection and Localization

    Luca D'Amiano;Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Autoencoder with recurrent neural networks for video forgery detection

    Dario D'Avino;Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Image forgery localization through the fusion of camera-based, feature-based and pixel-based techniques

    Davide Cozzolino;Diego Gragnaniello;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Image forgery detection through residual-based local descriptors and block-matching

    Davide Cozzolino;Diego Gragnaniello;Luisa Verdoliva

  • InSAR-BM3D: A Nonlocal Filter for SAR Interferometric Phase Restoration

    Francescopaolo Sica;Davide Cozzolino;Xiao Xiang Zhu;Luisa Verdoliva

  • Nonlocal CNN SAR Image Despeckling

    Davide Cozzolino;Luisa Verdoliva;Giuseppe Scarpa;Giovanni Poggi

  • A feature-based approach for image tampering detection and localization

    Luisa Verdoliva;Davide Cozzolino;Giovanni Poggi

  • Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection

    Unknown

  • Are GAN Generated Images Easy to Detect? A Critical Analysis of the State-Of-The-Art

    Diego Gragnaniello;Davide Cozzolino;Francesco Marra;Giovanni Poggi

Frequent Co-Authors

Luisa Verdoliva
Luisa Verdoliva University of Naples Federico II
Giovanni Poggi
Giovanni Poggi University of Naples Federico II
Justus Thies
Justus Thies Technical University of Munich
Matthias Nießner
Matthias Nießner Technical University of Munich
Carlo Sansone
Carlo Sansone University of Naples Federico II
Stefano Tubaro
Stefano Tubaro Polytechnic University of Milan
Paolo Bestagini
Paolo Bestagini Polytechnic University of Milan
Fabio Roli
Fabio Roli University of Genoa
Xiao Xiang Zhu
Xiao Xiang Zhu Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Computer Science education is evolving, with flexible pathways making it easier to get started or advance your career. For those seeking a foundational credential, exploring online associate degree programs can be a smart way to gain technical skills and enter the job market quickly.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. Fortunately, there are a variety of affordable online degree programs that provide quality education without a hefty price tag. These programs allow you to pursue your studies while minimizing debt.

Admission standards can be a barrier, but don’t let a lower academic record stop you. There are many online schools that accept low gpa, opening doors for prospective students who may not meet traditional entry requirements.

Graduates of Computer Science often find opportunities in tech, healthcare, business, and more. Interested in environmental tech or sustainability fields? Consider what options exist and check out what can you do with an environmental science degree for an alternate pathway that combines technology and environmental impact.

Best Scientists Citing Davide Cozzolino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles