World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Massimiliano de Leoni

Massimiliano de Leoni

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
6176
World Ranking
11584
National Ranking
383

Massimiliano de Leoni publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimiliano de Leoni sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 138 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Massimiliano de Leoni D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimiliano de Leoni sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Massimiliano de Leoni is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, Computer Science, and Decision Sciences. Within these broad disciplines, they focus notably on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, and Management Science and Operations Research. Additionally, their work touches on Artificial Intelligence and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering as subfields.

The scholar's research explores various topics related to business processes and information systems. Key areas of specialization include:

  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Massimiliano de Leoni has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Event abstraction in process mining: literature review and taxonomy" (2020), published in Granular Computing
  • "Fire now, fire later: alarm-based systems for prescriptive process monitoring" (2021), published in Knowledge and Information Systems
  • "An explainable decision support system for predictive process analytics" (2023), published in Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • "Object-centric process predictive analytics" (2022), published in Expert Systems with Applications
  • "Integrating BPMN and DMN: Modeling and Analysis" (2021), published in Journal on Data Semantics

Their publications frequently appear in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Information Systems, Granular Computing, Knowledge and Information Systems, and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Massimiliano de Leoni collaborates extensively with several researchers, including Francesco Vinci, Alessandro Padella, Riccardo Galanti, Nicolò Navarin, and Felix Mannhardt. The collaboration counts vary, with multiple co-authorships reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs

    Massimiliano de Leoni;Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Marcus Dees

  • Balanced multi-perspective checking of process conformance

    Felix Mannhardt;Massimiliano Leoni;Hajo A. Reijers;Wil M. Aalst

  • Data-aware process mining: discovering decisions in processes using alignments

    Massimiliano de Leoni;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • A recommendation system for predicting risks across multiple business process instances

    Raffaele Conforti;Massimiliano de Leoni;Massimiliano de Leoni;Marcello La Rosa;Marcello La Rosa;Wil M.P. van der Aalst;Wil M.P. van der Aalst

  • Declarative process mining in healthcare

    Marcella Rovani;Fabrizio M. Maggi;Massimiliano de Leoni;Wil M.P. van der Aalst

  • Time and activity sequence prediction of business process instances

    Mirko Polato;Alessandro Sperduti;Andrea Burattin;Massimiliano de Leoni

  • Event abstraction in process mining: literature review and taxonomy

    Sebastiaan J. van Zelst;Sebastiaan J. van Zelst;Felix Mannhardt;Felix Mannhardt;Massimiliano de Leoni;Agnes Koschmider

  • Aligning event logs and process models for multi-perspective conformance checking: an approach based on integer linear programming

    Massimiliano de Leoni;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • Pervasive Software Environments for Supporting Disaster Responses

    T. Catarci;M. de Leoni;A. Marrella;M. Mecella

  • Aligning event logs and declarative process models for conformance checking

    Massimiliano de Leoni;Fabrizio Maria Maggi;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • An alignment-based framework to check the conformance of declarative process models and to preprocess event-log data

    Massimiliano de Leoni;Fabrizio M. Maggi;Wil M.P. van der Aalst

  • Data-aware remaining time prediction of business process instances

    M Polato;A Sperduti;A Burattin;de M Massimiliano Leoni

  • Data-Driven Process Discovery - Revealing Conditional Infrequent Behavior from Event Logs

    F Felix Mannhardt;M Massimiliano de Leoni;HA Hajo Reijers;HA Hajo Reijers;Wmp Wil van der Aalst

  • Supporting risk-informed decisions during business process execution

    Raffaele Conforti;Massimiliano de Leoni;Marcello La Rosa;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • From Low-Level Events to Activities - A Pattern-Based Approach.

    Felix Mannhardt;Massimiliano de Leoni;Hajo A. Reijers;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • From low-level events to activities : a pattern-based approach

    F Felix Mannhardt;M Massimiliano de Leoni;HA Hajo Reijers;HA Hajo Reijers;Wmp Wil van der Aalst

  • Data- and resource-aware conformance checking of business processes

    M Massimiliano de Leoni;Wmp Wil van der Aalst;BF Boudewijn van Dongen

  • Aligning Real Process Executions and Prescriptive Process Models through Automated Planning

    Unknown

  • A general framework for correlating business process characteristics

    M Massimiliano de Leoni;M Massimiliano de Leoni;Wmp Wil van der Aalst;M Marcus Dees

  • The multi-perspective process explorer

    F Felix Mannhardt;M Massimiliano de Leoni;HA Hajo Reijers

  • Decision Mining Revisited - Discovering Overlapping Rules

    F Felix Mannhardt;M Massimiliano de Leoni;HA Hajo Reijers;HA Hajo Reijers;Wmp Wil van der Aalst

Frequent Co-Authors

Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Massimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella Sapienza University of Rome
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede Queensland University of Technology
Fabrizio Maria Maggi
Fabrizio Maria Maggi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Tiziana Catarci
Tiziana Catarci Sapienza University of Rome
Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Josep Carmona
Josep Carmona Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Marlon Dumas
Marlon Dumas University of Tartu
Marcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa University of Melbourne
Michael Adams
Michael Adams University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a variety of flexible, online learning paths. For students aiming to jumpstart their careers quickly, fastest online master's degree programs offer a way to earn advanced qualifications within a reduced timeframe. These accelerated options are perfect for working professionals or those eager to upskill efficiently.

Considering your long-term goals, it's important to focus on graduate degrees that are worth it. Opting for programs in high-demand fields ensures your investment leads to rewarding job prospects and industry relevance.

Not ready for a master’s yet? Many students begin with associates degrees online. These programs offer a strong computing foundation—often at a lower cost and in less time—preparing you to enter the workforce or continue your studies.

If cost is a concern, it's worth exploring cheap online degrees fast. Affordable accredited programs make computer science education accessible, helping you manage both your budget and your schedule while advancing your career.

Best Scientists Citing Massimiliano de Leoni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles