World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
7587
World Ranking
6987
National Ranking
3786

James T. Tedeschi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James T. Tedeschi sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James T. Tedeschi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James T. Tedeschi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James T. Tedeschi is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. This association situates them within an academic environment known for research and higher education activities.

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and topics of study are listed in the available data. Likewise, there are no awards or distinctions recorded for this scientist. The absence of detailed bibliographic and scholarly information limits a comprehensive assessment of their research output and thematic focus.

The profile focuses on specifying known institutional ties without additional publication or research details. No information regarding active research topics or frequent collaborations has been provided.

Best Publications

  • Violence, aggression & coercive actions

    James T. Tedeschi;Richard B. Felson

  • Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research

    James T. Tedeschi

  • Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle?

    James T. Tedeschi;Barry R. Schlenker;Thomas V. Bonoma

  • The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust.

    Barry R. Schlenker;Bob Helm;James T. Tedeschi

  • Mediating Effects of Blame Attributions on Feelings of Anger

    Brian M. Quigley;James T. Tedeschi

  • Development of a self-presentation tactics scale

    Suk-Jae Lee;Brian M Quigley;Mitchell S Nesler;Amy B Corbett

  • Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives.

    Richard B. Felson;James T. Tedeschi

  • Limitations of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression

    James T. Tedeschi;Brian M. Quigley

  • 1 – Identities, the Phenomenal Self, and Laboratory Research

    James T. Tedeschi;Marc Riess

  • Cultural Values in Conflict Management

    Unknown

  • A reinterpretation of research on aggression.

    James T. Tedeschi;R. Bob Smith;Robert C. Brown

  • Power Bases of Faculty Supervisors and Educational Outcomes for Graduate Students.

    Herman Aguinis;Mitchell S. Nesler;Brian M. Quigley;Suk-Jae Lee

  • The Effect of Credibility on Perceived Power1

    Mitchell S. Nesler;Herman Aguinis;Brian M. Quigley;James T. Tedeschi

  • Perspectives on social power

    Influence;James T. Tedeschi

  • Self-Serving Attributions: Biased Private Perceptions and Distorted Public Descriptions

    Marc Riess;Paul Rosenfeld;Valerie Melburg;James T. Tedeschi

  • Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research.

    Unknown

  • The social influence processes

    James T. Tedeschi

  • Conflict, Power, and Games: The Experimental Study of Interpersonal Relations

    James T. Tedeschi;Barry R. Schlenker;Thomas V. Bonoma

  • Humour as a Tool of Social Interaction

    Thomas R. Kane;Jerry Suls;James T. Tedeschi

  • Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influence

    James T. Tedeschi;Svenn Lindskold

  • Effects of Credibility and Magnitude of Punishment on Compliance to Threats.

    Joann Horai;James T. Tedeschi

  • A further comment on the construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to giancola and chermack

    James T Tedeschi;Brian M Quigley

  • Anger, Blame, and Dimensions of Perceived Norm Violations: Culture, Gender, and Relationships

    Ken Ichi Ohbuchi;Toru Tamura;Brian M. Quigley;James T. Tedeschi

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry R. Schlenker
Barry R. Schlenker University of Florida
Richard B. Felson
Richard B. Felson Pennsylvania State University
Brian M. Quigley
Brian M. Quigley University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Robert A. Giacalone
Robert A. Giacalone Texas State University
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Robert C. Brown
Robert C. Brown Iowa State University
Myrna L. Friedlander
Myrna L. Friedlander University at Albany, State University of New York
Astrid Schütz
Astrid Schütz University of Bamberg
Jerry Suls
Jerry Suls University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse online degree options and meaningful professional pathways. For those interested in becoming counselors, it’s essential to consider programs that offer both flexible learning and strong career outcomes. Students in Florida can start by reviewing the best value counseling master's degrees in Florida to identify reputable programs with robust graduate support.

If you’re located in the broader Southern region, research the most valuable counseling master's degree programs ranking in the South, which highlights top institutions blending affordability and quality. For those considering New York, the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in New York offers guidance on trusted online institutions leading to licensed clinical and school counseling roles.

Additionally, psychology degrees lay a strong foundation for work in research, social services, or organizational settings. The best online psychology degree rankings in Alabama can help you compare leading programs in the region. By researching accredited online degrees, students can tailor their academic journey to fit their career aspirations in the ever-expanding field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing James T. Tedeschi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles