World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6987 6515 3786 3443 209 7587

James T. Tedeschi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James T. Tedeschi between 1960 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James T. Tedeschi published across 58 years, from 1960 to 2017, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1969. 13 of the 242 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1969. 1960: 2 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 2 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 2 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 10 publications 1969: 16 publications 1970: 10 publications 1971: 14 publications 1972: 14 publications 1973: 16 publications 1974: 6 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 14 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 11 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 13 publications
1960 2017

242 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James T. Tedeschi: publications per year, 1960 to 2017
Year Publications
1960 2
1961 0
1962 1
1963 2
1964 1
1965 2
1966 1
1967 1
1968 10
1969 16
1970 10
1971 14
1972 14
1973 16
1974 6
1975 6
1976 14
1977 7
1978 8
1979 5
1980 1
1981 11
1982 4
1983 7
1984 3
1985 2
1986 5
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 7
1994 15
1995 3
1996 9
1997 4
1998 0
1999 3
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 13
Total 242
Download as CSV

James T. Tedeschi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James T. Tedeschi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 209
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James T. Tedeschi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James T. Tedeschi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James T. Tedeschi is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. This association situates them within an academic environment known for research and higher education activities.

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and topics of study are listed in the available data. Likewise, there are no awards or distinctions recorded for this scientist. The absence of detailed bibliographic and scholarly information limits a comprehensive assessment of their research output and thematic focus.

The profile focuses on specifying known institutional ties without additional publication or research details. No information regarding active research topics or frequent collaborations has been provided.

Best Publications

  • Violence, aggression & coercive actions

    James T. Tedeschi;Richard B. Felson

  • Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research

    James T. Tedeschi

  • Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle?

    James T. Tedeschi;Barry R. Schlenker;Thomas V. Bonoma

  • The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust.

    Barry R. Schlenker;Bob Helm;James T. Tedeschi

  • Mediating Effects of Blame Attributions on Feelings of Anger

    Brian M. Quigley;James T. Tedeschi

  • Development of a self-presentation tactics scale

    Suk-Jae Lee;Brian M Quigley;Mitchell S Nesler;Amy B Corbett

  • Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives.

    Richard B. Felson;James T. Tedeschi

  • Limitations of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression

    James T. Tedeschi;Brian M. Quigley

  • 1 – Identities, the Phenomenal Self, and Laboratory Research

    James T. Tedeschi;Marc Riess

  • Cultural Values in Conflict Management

    Unknown

  • A reinterpretation of research on aggression.

    James T. Tedeschi;R. Bob Smith;Robert C. Brown

  • Power Bases of Faculty Supervisors and Educational Outcomes for Graduate Students.

    Herman Aguinis;Mitchell S. Nesler;Brian M. Quigley;Suk-Jae Lee

  • The Effect of Credibility on Perceived Power1

    Mitchell S. Nesler;Herman Aguinis;Brian M. Quigley;James T. Tedeschi

  • Perspectives on social power

    Influence;James T. Tedeschi

  • Self-Serving Attributions: Biased Private Perceptions and Distorted Public Descriptions

    Marc Riess;Paul Rosenfeld;Valerie Melburg;James T. Tedeschi

  • Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research.

    Unknown

  • The social influence processes

    James T. Tedeschi

  • Conflict, Power, and Games: The Experimental Study of Interpersonal Relations

    James T. Tedeschi;Barry R. Schlenker;Thomas V. Bonoma

  • Humour as a Tool of Social Interaction

    Thomas R. Kane;Jerry Suls;James T. Tedeschi

  • Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influence

    James T. Tedeschi;Svenn Lindskold

  • Effects of Credibility and Magnitude of Punishment on Compliance to Threats.

    Joann Horai;James T. Tedeschi

  • A further comment on the construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to giancola and chermack

    James T Tedeschi;Brian M Quigley

  • Anger, Blame, and Dimensions of Perceived Norm Violations: Culture, Gender, and Relationships

    Ken Ichi Ohbuchi;Toru Tamura;Brian M. Quigley;James T. Tedeschi

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry R. Schlenker
Barry R. Schlenker University of Florida
Richard B. Felson
Richard B. Felson Pennsylvania State University
Brian M. Quigley
Brian M. Quigley University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Robert A. Giacalone
Robert A. Giacalone Texas State University
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Robert C. Brown
Robert C. Brown Iowa State University
Myrna L. Friedlander
Myrna L. Friedlander University at Albany, State University of New York
Astrid Schütz
Astrid Schütz University of Bamberg
Jerry Suls
Jerry Suls University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse online degree options and meaningful professional pathways. For those interested in becoming counselors, it’s essential to consider programs that offer both flexible learning and strong career outcomes. Students in Florida can start by reviewing the best value counseling master's degrees in Florida to identify reputable programs with robust graduate support.

If you’re located in the broader Southern region, research the most valuable counseling master's degree programs ranking in the South, which highlights top institutions blending affordability and quality. For those considering New York, the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in New York offers guidance on trusted online institutions leading to licensed clinical and school counseling roles.

Additionally, psychology degrees lay a strong foundation for work in research, social services, or organizational settings. The best online psychology degree rankings in Alabama can help you compare leading programs in the region. By researching accredited online degrees, students can tailor their academic journey to fit their career aspirations in the ever-expanding field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing James T. Tedeschi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles