World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
14865
World Ranking
4157
National Ranking
188

Astrid Schütz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Astrid Schütz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 286 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Astrid Schütz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Astrid Schütz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Astrid Schütz is affiliated with the University of Bamberg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a focus on social psychology, clinical psychology, and related subfields. Their work spans several key areas including social and intergroup psychology, personality traits, behavioral health and interventions, emotional intelligence, cultural differences and values, attachment, relationship dynamics, and the impact of COVID-19 on mental health.

Their recent research output includes notable publications such as:

  • Mental health prevalence and predictors among university students in nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study (2021) published in Scientific Reports
  • A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect (2021) published in Psychological Science
  • A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Randomized Controlled Positive Psychological Interventions on Subjective and Psychological Well-Being (2020) published in Applied Research in Quality of Life
  • Satisfaction with life among university students from nine countries: Cross-national study during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic (2021) published in BMC Public Health
  • A Comparison of Depression and Anxiety among University Students in Nine Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021) published in Journal of Clinical Medicine

Their work also encompasses significant collaborations, frequently coauthoring with colleagues such as Robert Körner, Jessica Röhner, Johannes Leder, Lukas Röseler, and Marco J. Held.

Schütz's research has appeared repeatedly in prominent publication venues, notably:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • PLoS ONE
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • Personality and Individual Differences

They have also contributed to several book publications under publishers including Hogrefe Verlag, Basiswissen Psychologie, Otto-Friedrich-Universität eBooks, and Hogrefe AG eBooks. Titles authored include:

  • Was Führungskräfte über Psychologie wissen sollten (2020)
  • Macht Erfolg glücklich? (2020)
  • Psychologie der Kommunikation (2020)
  • Inventar und Situational Judgement Test zur Erfassung sozial-emotionaler Kompetenz(en) (SEC-I und SEC-SJT): Diagnostische Verfahren zur multimethodalen Erfassung sozial-emotionaler Kompetenz(en) bei jungen Menschen mit (sub-)klinischer kognitiver bzw. psychischer Beeinträchtig (2020)
  • Phänomene der Antwortverzerrung in der Psychologischen Diagnostik (2025)

Main fields of study for Schütz include psychology broadly, with particular emphasis on social psychology and clinical psychology. Their scholarly contributions address topics such as subjective well-being, mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, psychological interventions, and measurement of social-emotional competencies.

Best Publications

  • The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations

    David P. Schmitt;Jüri Allik;Robert R. McCrae;Verónica Benet-Martínez

  • Emotional Intelligence and Social Interaction

    Paulo N. Lopes;Marc A. Brackett;John B. Nezlek;Astrid Schütz

  • A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • The Attractive Female Body Weight and Female Body Dissatisfaction in 26 Countries Across 10 World Regions: Results of the International Body Project I

    Viren Swami;David A Frederick;Toivo Aavik;Lidia Alcalay

  • Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands

    David P. Schmitt

  • Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs

    David P. Schmitt;Lidia Alcalay;Melissa Allensworth;Jüri Allik

  • Personality in cyberspace: Personal web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions.

    Bernd Marcus;Franz Machilek;Astrid Schütz

  • Patterns and Universals of Mate Poaching Across 53 Nations: The Effects of Sex, Culture, and Personality on Romantically Attracting Another Person's Partner

    David P. Schmitt

  • Assertive, Offensive, Protective, and Defensive Styles of Self-Presentation: A Taxonomy

    Astrid Schütz

  • Psychologie der Kommunikation

    Jessica Röhner;Astrid Schütz

  • Emotional intelligence and mental disorder.

    Janine Hertel;Astrid Schütz;Claas-Hinrich Lammers

  • Mental health prevalence and predictors among university students in nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study.

    Dominika Ochnik;Aleksandra M. Rogowska;Cezary Kuśnierz;Monika Jakubiak

  • Comparing immersive virtual reality and powerpoint as methods for delivering safety training: Impacts on risk perception, learning, and decision making

    Johannes Leder;Tina Horlitz;Patrick Puschmann;Volker Wittstock

  • Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys

    Bernd Marcus;Michael Bosnjak;Steffen Lindner;Stanislav Pilischenko

  • Emotion regulation and the quality of social interaction: does the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses matter?

    Paulo N. Lopes;John B. Nezlek;Natalio Extremera;Janine Hertel

  • Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt: Psychometrische Eigenschaften einer Lang- und einer Kurzform des Deutschen NPI (Narcissistic Personality Inventory)

    Astrid Schütz;Bernd Marcus;Ina Sellin

  • Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self- and observer ratings.

    Bernd Marcus;Astrid Schütz

  • A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect:

    Kathleen D. Vohs;Brandon J. Schmeichel;Sophie Lohmann;Sophie Lohmann;Quentin F. Gronau

  • High implicit self‐esteem is not necessarily advantageous: discrepancies between explicit and implicit self‐esteem and their relationship with anger expression and psychological health

    Michela Schröder‐Abé;Almut Rudolph;Astrid Schütz

  • Mehrebenenanalysen in der psychologischen Forschung

    John B. Nezlek;Michela Schröder-Abé;Astrid Schütz

  • Differences in How Trait Emotional Intelligence Predicts Life Satisfaction: The Role of Affect Balance Versus Social Support in India and Germany

    Selda Koydemir;Ömer Faruk Şimşek;Astrid Schütz;Arun Tipandjan

  • Multidimensionale Selbstwertskala (MSWS)

    Astrid Schütz;Katrin Rentzsch

Frequent Co-Authors

John B. Nezlek
John B. Nezlek University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Thomas W. Schubert
Thomas W. Schubert University of Oslo
Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna
Jamin Halberstadt
Jamin Halberstadt University of Otago
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford Oakland University
Michael Cunningham
Michael Cunningham University of Louisville
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a gateway to diverse career paths. From mental health services to specialized research, students can align their education with rapidly growing fields. The range of psychology branches includes clinical, forensic, industrial-organizational, neuropsychology, and counseling, each offering unique professional challenges and rewards.

If you are considering postgraduate study, exploring career options after msc psychology can help you focus your ambitions. Graduates with a master’s or advanced degree may find rewarding roles in therapy, counseling, research, and more, but requirements vary by specialization.

It’s essential to recognize the degree required to be a clinical psychologist—in many states, a doctorate is needed for licensing as a clinical psychologist. However, many impactful roles are open with a master’s in psychology.

Specializing in work with young people is also in high demand. Numerous careers in child and adolescent psychology allow graduates to support the mental health and wellbeing of youth, either in schools, private practice, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Astrid Schütz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles