World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
15476
World Ranking
10142
National Ranking
181

Felix Naef publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Naef sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Felix Naef D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Naef sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Felix Naef is a researcher affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their work primarily falls within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology, Aging, and Plant Science.

Their research topics include:

  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

Naef has published extensively in several venues. Frequent publication outlets include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Science.

Some recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Felix Naef are:

  • Systematic analysis of differential rhythmic liver gene expression mediated by the circadian clock and feeding rhythms, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Sex-dimorphic and age-dependent organization of 24-hour gene expression rhythms in humans, 2023, Science
  • Space-time logic of liver gene expression at sub-lobular scale, 2021, Nature Metabolism
  • The Effects of Time-Restricted Eating versus Standard Dietary Advice on Weight, Metabolic Health and the Consumption of Processed Food: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial in Community-Based Adults, 2021, Nutrients
  • Spatiotemporal Metabolic Liver Zonation and Consequences on Pathophysiology, 2023, Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease

Frequent collaborators include Cédric Gobet, Lorenzo Figà Talamanca, Nicholas E. Phillips, Clémence Hurni, and Tinh-Hai Collet.

Felix Naef has been recognized as a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), reflecting a standing within the molecular biology research community.

Best Publications

  • Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells.

    Emi Nagoshi;Camille Saini;Christoph Bauer;Thierry Laroche

  • Mammalian genes are transcribed with widely different bursting kinetics

    David M. Suter;Nacho Molina;David Gatfield;David Gatfield;Kim Schneider

  • Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse

    Noboru Sato;Ignacio Munoz Sanjuan;Michael Heke;Makiko Uchida

  • TRANSPORT AND CONSERVATION LAWS

    X. Zotos;F. Naef;P. Prelovsek

  • Circadian regulation of gene expression systems in the Drosophila head

    Adam Claridge-Chang;Herman Wijnen;Felix Naef;Catharine Boothroyd

  • Genome-wide and phase-specific DNA-binding rhythms of BMAL1 control circadian output functions in mouse liver.

    Guillaume Rey;François Cesbron;Jacques Rougemont;Jacques Rougemont;Hans Reinke;Hans Reinke;Hans Reinke

  • The nodal precursor acting via activin receptors induces mesoderm by maintaining a source of its convertases and BMP4.

    Nadav Ben-Haim;Cindy Lu;Marcela Guzman-Ayala;Luca Pescatore

  • Circadian clock-dependent and -independent rhythmic proteomes implement distinct diurnal functions in mouse liver.

    Daniel Mauvoisin;Jingkui Wang;Céline Jouffe;Céline Jouffe;Eva Martin;Eva Martin

  • The Circadian Clock Coordinates Ribosome Biogenesis

    Céline Jouffe;Gaspard Cretenet;Laura Symul;Eva Martin

  • Guidelines for Genome-Scale Analysis of Biological Rhythms

    Michael E. Hughes;Katherine C. Abruzzi;Ravi Allada;Ron Anafi

  • Chemotaxis Behavior Mediated by Single Larval Olfactory Neurons in Drosophila

    Elane Fishilevich;Ana I. Domingos;Kenta Asahina;Félix Naef;Félix Naef

  • Solving the riddle of the bright mismatches: labeling and effective binding in oligonucleotide arrays.

    Felix Naef;Marcelo O. Magnasco

  • Cold-Inducible RNA-Binding Protein Modulates Circadian Gene Expression Posttranscriptionally

    Joerg Morf;Guillaume Rey;Kim Schneider;Markus Stratmann

  • The Mouse Microbiome Is Required for Sex-Specific Diurnal Rhythms of Gene Expression and Metabolism

    Benjamin D. Weger;Cédric Gobet;Jake Yeung;Eva Martin

  • A Self-Regulatory System of Interlinked Signaling Feedback Loops Controls Mouse Limb Patterning

    Jean-Denis Bénazet;Mirko Bischofberger;Eva Tiecke;Alexandre Gonçalves

  • Circadian and feeding rhythms differentially affect rhythmic mRNA transcription and translation in mouse liver

    Florian Atger;Cédric Gobet;Julien Marquis;Eva Martin

  • Robust synchronization of coupled circadian and cell cycle oscillators in single mammalian cells

    Jonathan Bieler;Rosamaria Cannavo;Kyle Gustafson;Cedric Gobet

  • Absolute mRNA concentrations from sequence-specific calibration of oligonucleotide arrays.

    Doeke Hekstra;Alexander R. Taussig;Marcelo Magnasco;Felix Naef

  • Genome-wide RNA polymerase II profiles and RNA accumulation reveal kinetics of transcription and associated epigenetic changes during diurnal cycles.

    Gwendal Le Martelot;Donatella Canella;Laura Symul;Eugenia Migliavacca

  • A process based assessment of the potential to reduce flood runoff by land use change

    Felix Naef;Simon Scherrer;Markus Weiler

Frequent Co-Authors

Ueli Schibler
Ueli Schibler University of Geneva
Mauro Delorenzi
Mauro Delorenzi University of Lausanne
Ioannis Xenarios
Ioannis Xenarios University of Lausanne
Bart Deplancke
Bart Deplancke École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Nouria Hernandez
Nouria Hernandez University of Lausanne
Denis Duboule
Denis Duboule Collège de France
Michael W. Young
Michael W. Young Rockefeller University
David Shore
David Shore University of Geneva
Philipp Bucher
Philipp Bucher École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Paul Franken
Paul Franken University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Felix Naef

Trending Scientists