World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 63 3444 3149 126 112 280 10987

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Philippe Ranjeva between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Philippe Ranjeva published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2016. 26 of the 296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2016. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 10 publications
1996 2025

296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 4
1998 9
1999 8
2000 3
2001 2
2002 5
2003 6
2004 4
2005 9
2006 9
2007 9
2008 7
2009 7
2010 12
2011 11
2012 9
2013 12
2014 11
2015 13
2016 29
2017 27
2018 12
2019 9
2020 13
2021 11
2022 14
2023 4
2024 16
2025 10
Total 296
Download as CSV

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Ranjeva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 278–287 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 280 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125 280
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Ranjeva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva is affiliated with Aix-Marseille University in France and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans several specialized subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their research focuses on topics such as Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Neurological Disorders and Treatments.

Among the recent publications authored or co-authored by Jean-Philippe Ranjeva are:

  • 7T Epilepsy Task Force Consensus Recommendations on the Use of 7T MRI in Clinical Practice (2020, Neurology)
  • Amygdalar nuclei and hippocampal subfields on MRI: Test-retest reliability of automated volumetry across different MRI sites and vendors (2020, NeuroImage)
  • The Role of the Human Hypothalamus in Food Intake Networks: An MRI Perspective (2022, Frontiers in Nutrition)
  • Accuracy and reproducibility of automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation with lesion segmentation tool: A European multi-site 3T study (2020, Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
  • Modular slowing of resting-state dynamic functional connectivity as a marker of cognitive dysfunction induced by sleep deprivation (2020, NeuroImage)

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva frequently collaborates with other researchers including Maxime Guye, Fabrice Bartolomei, Wafaa Zaaraoui, Olivier M. Girard, and Arnaud Le Troter.

Their publications appear often in specialized venues such as:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Best Publications

  • Decreased basal fMRI functional connectivity in epileptogenic networks and contralateral compensatory mechanisms.

    Gaelle Bettus;Eric Guedj;Eric Guedj;Florian Joyeux;Florian Joyeux;Sylviane Confort-Gouny;Sylviane Confort-Gouny

  • Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS.

    Bertrand Audoin;Danielle Ibarrola;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva;Sylviane Confort-Gouny

  • Differential fMRI responses in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and left supramarginal gyrus to habituation and change detection in syllables and tones.

    P. Celsis;K. Boulanouar;B. Doyon;J.P. Ranjeva

  • Entorhinal Cortex Involvement in Human Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: An Electrophysiologic and Volumetric Study

    Fabrice Bartolomei;Mouhamad Khalil;Fabrice Wendling;Anna Sontheimer

  • Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

    Bertrand Audoin;My Van Au Duong;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva;Danielle Ibarrola

  • Role of resting state functional connectivity MRI in presurgical investigation of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Gaelle Bettus;Fabrice Bartolomei;Sylviane Confort-Gouny;Eric Guedj

  • Atrophy mainly affects the limbic system and the deep grey matter at the first stage of multiple sclerosis

    Bertrand Audoin;Wafaa Zaaraoui;Françoise Reuter;Audrey Rico

  • Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations

    J Jovicich;M Marizzoni;R Sala-Llonch;B Bosch

  • Assessing brain connectivity at rest is clinically relevant in early multiple sclerosis

    Anthony Faivre;Audrey Rico;Wafaa Zaaraoui;Lydie Crespy

  • Interictal functional connectivity of human epileptic networks assessed by intracerebral EEG and BOLD signal fluctuations.

    Gaelle Bettus;Jean Philippe Ranjeva;Jean Philippe Ranjeva;Fabrice Wendling;Christian G. Bénar;Christian G. Bénar

  • Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain to differentiate gliomatosis cerebri from low-grade glioma

    Damien Galanaud;Olivier Chinot;François Nicoli;Sylviane Confort-Gouny

  • Imaging structural and functional connectivity: towards a unified definition of human brain organization?

    Maxime Guye;Fabrice Bartolomei;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

  • Spinal cord involvement in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

    Olga Ciccarelli;Olga Ciccarelli;Jeffrey A Cohen;Stephen C Reingold;Brian G Weinshenker

  • Metabolic counterpart of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient during hyperacute ischemic stroke: a brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study.

    F. Nicoli;Y. Lefur;B. Denis;J.P. Ranjeva

  • Modulation of effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

    M.V. Au Duong;K. Boulanouar;B. Audoin;S. Treseras

  • Distribution of Brain Sodium Accumulation Correlates with Disability in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional 23Na MR Imaging Study

    Wafaa Zaaraoui;Simon Konstandin;Bertrand Audoin;Armin M. Nagel

  • Usefulness of motor functional MRI correlated to cortical mapping in Rolandic low-grade astrocytomas.

    F. E. Roux;K. Boulanouar;J. P. Ranjeva;M. Tremoulet

  • Functional connectivity changes differ in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Natalina Gour;Olivier Felician;Mira Didic;Lejla Koric

  • Structure of WM bundles constituting the working memory system in early multiple sclerosis: A quantitative DTI tractography study

    Bertrand Audoin;Maxime Guye;Françoise Reuter;My-Van Au Duong

  • Early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairment.

    Sven Joubert;Natalina Gour;Eric Guedj;Mira Didic

  • Altered Functional Connectivity Related to White Matter Changes inside the Working Memory Network at the Very Early Stage of MS

    My-Van Au Duong;Bertrand Audoin;Kader Boulanouar;Daniella Ibarrola

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick J. Cozzone
Patrick J. Cozzone Aix-Marseille University
Maxime Guye
Maxime Guye Aix-Marseille University
David Bartrés-Faz
David Bartrés-Faz University of Barcelona
Flavio Nobili
Flavio Nobili University of Genoa
Jorge Jovicich
Jorge Jovicich University of Trento
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Andrea Soricelli
Andrea Soricelli Parthenope University of Naples
Magda Tsolaki
Magda Tsolaki Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Neuroscience degree can open doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities. For those interested in flexible study options or related fields, several accredited online pathways exist. If you’re considering mental health or social work roles, explore 1 year msw programs, which are fast-tracked to help you advance your career quickly.

Psychology is a natural complement to Neuroscience. Students can gain foundational knowledge quickly by enrolling in an online accelerated psychology degree. These programs are designed to fit busy schedules while maintaining educational rigor.

For those drawn to counseling, finding reputable and affordable programs is key. Consider the best online cacrep counseling programs, which meet high industry standards. Additionally, if you are specifically interested in direct clinical practice, review online options in online clinical mental health counseling.

These choices can help you build practical skills and pursue a fulfilling career in neuroscience-related fields—entirely online and often at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles