World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
10987
World Ranking
3444
National Ranking
126

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Ranjeva sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 280 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Ranjeva sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva is affiliated with Aix-Marseille University in France and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans several specialized subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their research focuses on topics such as Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Neurological Disorders and Treatments.

Among the recent publications authored or co-authored by Jean-Philippe Ranjeva are:

  • 7T Epilepsy Task Force Consensus Recommendations on the Use of 7T MRI in Clinical Practice (2020, Neurology)
  • Amygdalar nuclei and hippocampal subfields on MRI: Test-retest reliability of automated volumetry across different MRI sites and vendors (2020, NeuroImage)
  • The Role of the Human Hypothalamus in Food Intake Networks: An MRI Perspective (2022, Frontiers in Nutrition)
  • Accuracy and reproducibility of automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation with lesion segmentation tool: A European multi-site 3T study (2020, Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
  • Modular slowing of resting-state dynamic functional connectivity as a marker of cognitive dysfunction induced by sleep deprivation (2020, NeuroImage)

Jean-Philippe Ranjeva frequently collaborates with other researchers including Maxime Guye, Fabrice Bartolomei, Wafaa Zaaraoui, Olivier M. Girard, and Arnaud Le Troter.

Their publications appear often in specialized venues such as:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Best Publications

  • Decreased basal fMRI functional connectivity in epileptogenic networks and contralateral compensatory mechanisms.

    Gaelle Bettus;Eric Guedj;Eric Guedj;Florian Joyeux;Florian Joyeux;Sylviane Confort-Gouny;Sylviane Confort-Gouny

  • Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS.

    Bertrand Audoin;Danielle Ibarrola;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva;Sylviane Confort-Gouny

  • Differential fMRI responses in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and left supramarginal gyrus to habituation and change detection in syllables and tones.

    P. Celsis;K. Boulanouar;B. Doyon;J.P. Ranjeva

  • Entorhinal Cortex Involvement in Human Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: An Electrophysiologic and Volumetric Study

    Fabrice Bartolomei;Mouhamad Khalil;Fabrice Wendling;Anna Sontheimer

  • Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

    Bertrand Audoin;My Van Au Duong;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva;Danielle Ibarrola

  • Role of resting state functional connectivity MRI in presurgical investigation of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Gaelle Bettus;Fabrice Bartolomei;Sylviane Confort-Gouny;Eric Guedj

  • Atrophy mainly affects the limbic system and the deep grey matter at the first stage of multiple sclerosis

    Bertrand Audoin;Wafaa Zaaraoui;Françoise Reuter;Audrey Rico

  • Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations

    J Jovicich;M Marizzoni;R Sala-Llonch;B Bosch

  • Assessing brain connectivity at rest is clinically relevant in early multiple sclerosis

    Anthony Faivre;Audrey Rico;Wafaa Zaaraoui;Lydie Crespy

  • Interictal functional connectivity of human epileptic networks assessed by intracerebral EEG and BOLD signal fluctuations.

    Gaelle Bettus;Jean Philippe Ranjeva;Jean Philippe Ranjeva;Fabrice Wendling;Christian G. Bénar;Christian G. Bénar

  • Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain to differentiate gliomatosis cerebri from low-grade glioma

    Damien Galanaud;Olivier Chinot;François Nicoli;Sylviane Confort-Gouny

  • Imaging structural and functional connectivity: towards a unified definition of human brain organization?

    Maxime Guye;Fabrice Bartolomei;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

  • Spinal cord involvement in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

    Olga Ciccarelli;Olga Ciccarelli;Jeffrey A Cohen;Stephen C Reingold;Brian G Weinshenker

  • Metabolic counterpart of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient during hyperacute ischemic stroke: a brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study.

    F. Nicoli;Y. Lefur;B. Denis;J.P. Ranjeva

  • Modulation of effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

    M.V. Au Duong;K. Boulanouar;B. Audoin;S. Treseras

  • Distribution of Brain Sodium Accumulation Correlates with Disability in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional 23Na MR Imaging Study

    Wafaa Zaaraoui;Simon Konstandin;Bertrand Audoin;Armin M. Nagel

  • Usefulness of motor functional MRI correlated to cortical mapping in Rolandic low-grade astrocytomas.

    F. E. Roux;K. Boulanouar;J. P. Ranjeva;M. Tremoulet

  • Functional connectivity changes differ in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Natalina Gour;Olivier Felician;Mira Didic;Lejla Koric

  • Structure of WM bundles constituting the working memory system in early multiple sclerosis: A quantitative DTI tractography study

    Bertrand Audoin;Maxime Guye;Françoise Reuter;My-Van Au Duong

  • Early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairment.

    Sven Joubert;Natalina Gour;Eric Guedj;Mira Didic

  • Altered Functional Connectivity Related to White Matter Changes inside the Working Memory Network at the Very Early Stage of MS

    My-Van Au Duong;Bertrand Audoin;Kader Boulanouar;Daniella Ibarrola

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick J. Cozzone
Patrick J. Cozzone Aix-Marseille University
Maxime Guye
Maxime Guye Aix-Marseille University
David Bartrés-Faz
David Bartrés-Faz University of Barcelona
Flavio Nobili
Flavio Nobili University of Genoa
Jorge Jovicich
Jorge Jovicich University of Trento
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Andrea Soricelli
Andrea Soricelli Parthenope University of Naples
Magda Tsolaki
Magda Tsolaki Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Neuroscience degree can open doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities. For those interested in flexible study options or related fields, several accredited online pathways exist. If you’re considering mental health or social work roles, explore 1 year msw programs, which are fast-tracked to help you advance your career quickly.

Psychology is a natural complement to Neuroscience. Students can gain foundational knowledge quickly by enrolling in an online accelerated psychology degree. These programs are designed to fit busy schedules while maintaining educational rigor.

For those drawn to counseling, finding reputable and affordable programs is key. Consider the best online cacrep counseling programs, which meet high industry standards. Additionally, if you are specifically interested in direct clinical practice, review online options in online clinical mental health counseling.

These choices can help you build practical skills and pursue a fulfilling career in neuroscience-related fields—entirely online and often at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles