World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
10062
World Ranking
15145
National Ranking
17

Michael Seeger publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Seeger sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael Seeger D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Seeger sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Seeger is affiliated with the Federico Santa María Technical University in Chile. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

Their work focuses on several subfields, including:

  • Plant Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biomaterials
  • Cell Biology
  • Ecology

Michael Seeger has contributed to various topics, notably:

  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Biodegradable Polymer Synthesis and Properties
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Their recent papers reflect a diverse range of research interests and publication venues, including:

  • "GenoVi, an open-source automated circular genome visualizer for bacteria and archaea," 2023, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "Applications of Electrospun Nanofibers with Antioxidant Properties: A Review," 2020, Nanomaterials
  • "Microbial Diversity of Psychrotolerant Bacteria Isolated from Wild Flora of Andes Mountains and Patagonia of Chile towards the Selection of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Consortia to Alleviate Cold Stress in Plants," 2021, Microorganisms
  • "Responses of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon roots to the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae and the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Ensifer meliloti include changes in volatile organic compounds," 2020, Mycorrhiza
  • "Genome-Wide Metabolic Reconstruction of the Synthesis of Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Sugars and Fatty Acids by Burkholderia Sensu Lato Species," 2021, Microorganisms

Seeger frequently publishes in specific journals, most notably:

  • Microorganisms
  • Plants
  • Biological Research
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
  • Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Collaborations feature prominently in Seeger's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Roberto E. Durán
  • Paulina Vega-Celedón
  • Ximena Besoaín
  • Miryam Valenzuela
  • Iván Montenegro

Best Publications

  • Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 harbors a multi-replicon, 9.73-Mbp genome shaped for versatility

    Patrick S. G. Chain;Vincent J. Denef;Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis;Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis;Lisa M. Vergez;Lisa M. Vergez

  • Genomic analysis of the potential for aromatic compounds biodegradation in Burkholderiales.

    Danilo Pérez-Pantoja;Raúl Donoso;Raúl Donoso;Loreine Agulló;Macarena Córdova

  • Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: catabolic genes, microbial communities, and applications

    Sebastián Fuentes;Valentina Méndez;Patricia Aguila;Michael Seeger

  • The Interferon-Gamma-inducible 11 S Regulator (PA28) and the LMP2/LMP7 Subunits Govern the Peptide Production by the 20 S Proteasome in Vitro

    Marcus Groettrup;Thomas Ruppert;Lothar Kuehn;Michael Seeger

  • Bacterial metabolism of polychlorinated biphenyls.

    Dietmar H. Pieper;Michael Seeger

  • Unified nomenclature for the COP9 signalosome and its subunits: an essential regulator of development

    XW Deng;W Dubiel;N Wei;K Hofmann

  • Characterization of copper-resistant bacteria and bacterial communities from copper-polluted agricultural soils of central Chile

    Fabiola Altimira;Carolina Yáñez;Carolina Yáñez;Guillermo Bravo;Myriam González

  • Bacterial production of the biodegradable plastics polyhydroxyalkanoates

    Viviana Urtuvia;Pamela Villegas;Myriam González;Michael Seeger

  • Conversion of chlorobiphenyls into phenylhexadienoates and benzoates by the enzymes of the upper pathway for polychlorobiphenyl degradation encoded by the bph locus of Pseudomonas sp. strain LB400.

    M Seeger;K N Timmis;B Hofer

  • Characterization of the metabolically modified heavy metal-resistant Cupriavidus metallidurans strain MSR33 generated for mercury bioremediation

    Luis A. Rojas;Luis A. Rojas;Carolina Yáñez;Myriam González;Soledad Lobos

  • Regiospecificity of Dioxygenation of Di- to Pentachlorobiphenyls and Their Degradation to Chlorobenzoates by the bph-Encoded Catabolic Pathway of Burkholderia sp. Strain LB400

    Michael Seeger;Michael Seeger;Marco Zielinski;Kenneth N. Timmis;Bernd Hofer

  • Effect of external pH perturbations on in vivo protein synthesis by the acidophilic bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans.

    A M Amaro;D Chamorro;M Seeger;R Arredondo

  • Intermediate-type 20 S Proteasomes in HeLa Cells: “Asymmetric” Subunit Composition, Diversity and Adaptation

    Nicola Klare;Michael Seeger;Katharina Janek;Peter R. Jungblut

  • HIV-1 Tat Inhibits the 20 S Proteasome and Its 11 S Regulator-mediated Activation

    Michael Seeger;Katherine Ferrell;Rainer Frank;Wolfgang Dubiel

  • Living at the Frontiers of Life: Extremophiles in Chile and Their Potential for Bioremediation.

    Roberto Orellana;Roberto Orellana;Constanza Macaya;Guillermo Bravo;Flavia Dorochesi

  • From PCBs to highly toxic metabolites by the biphenyl pathway

    Beatriz Cámara;Cristina Herrera;Myriam González;Eduardo Couve

  • Comparison of human COP9 signalosome and 26S proteasome 'lid'

    Wolfgang Henke;Katherine Ferrell;Dawadschargal Bech-Otschir;Michael Seeger

  • From Rare to Dominant: a Fine-Tuned Soil Bacterial Bloom during Petroleum Hydrocarbon Bioremediation

    Sebastián Fuentes;Bárbara Barra;J. Gregory Caporaso;Michael Seeger

  • Dehalogenation, Denitration, Dehydroxylation, and Angular Attack on Substituted Biphenyls and Related Compounds by a Biphenyl Dioxygenase

    Michael Seeger;Beatriz Cámara;Bernd Hofer

  • Resistance to diverse drugs and ultraviolet light conferred by overexpression of a novel human 26 S proteasome subunit.

    Vito Spataro;Takashi Toda;Randa Craig;Michael Seeger

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward R. B. Moore
Edward R. B. Moore University of Gothenburg
Andrea Franzetti
Andrea Franzetti University of Milano-Bicocca
Victor Wray
Victor Wray Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Kenneth N. Timmis
Kenneth N. Timmis Technische Universität Braunschweig
Raymond J. Turner
Raymond J. Turner University of Calgary
Dietmar H. Pieper
Dietmar H. Pieper Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Luciano Avio
Luciano Avio University of Pisa
Stephanie Malfatti
Stephanie Malfatti Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis
Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis Georgia Institute of Technology
Manuela Giovannetti
Manuela Giovannetti University of Pisa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re studying Biology or Biochemistry, there are many flexible online pathways that can lead to rewarding careers in healthcare, business, or data-driven roles. For those interested in management, the cheapest online mba healthcare management programs make it easier than ever to upskill without taking on excessive student debt.

Another in-demand area is medical coding and billing. Choosing between cpc vs ccs certifications can be confusing, as each credential offers unique advantages for entry into the medical coding field. Understanding the differences will help you select the right pathway for your long-term goals.

Salary expectations for medical coders are an important consideration. According to recent data, medical coder salary can vary by certification, experience, and location, but generally offers a stable income with growth potential.

If you’re wondering if this path suits you, learn more about the advantages and challenges in the field by reading is medical billing and coding worth it. Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can help you make a well-informed decision for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Seeger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles