World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Czechia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 59 10218 9240 44 38 212 11504
Biology and Biochemistry 66 8671 8002 9 8 266 15515

Tomáš Cajthaml publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tomáš Cajthaml between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tomáš Cajthaml published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2022. 19 of the 346 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2022. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 3 publications
1998 2026

346 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tomáš Cajthaml: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 4
2005 6
2006 5
2007 6
2008 9
2009 11
2010 10
2011 9
2012 9
2013 13
2014 13
2015 18
2016 27
2017 18
2018 15
2019 16
2020 21
2021 25
2022 29
2023 25
2024 24
2025 16
2026 3
Total 346
Download as CSV

Tomáš Cajthaml publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Cajthaml sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 257–266 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 266 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524 266
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Tomáš Cajthaml D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Cajthaml sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897 66
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Czechia Leader Award

Overview

Tomáš Cajthaml is a researcher affiliated with the Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic, focusing primarily on environmental sciences and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans various subfields including pollution, plant science, ecology, soil science, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The main topics addressed in Tomáš Cajthaml's research include pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts, mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions, microplastics and plastic pollution, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants, microbial community ecology and physiology, and composting and vermicomposting techniques.

Tomáš Cajthaml has contributed to several frequent publication venues, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Chemosphere
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Tomáš Cajthaml include:

  • Complementary Roles of Wood-Inhabiting Fungi and Bacteria Facilitate Deadwood Decomposition, 2021, mSystems
  • Screening for 32 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) including GenX in sludges from 43 WWTPs located in the Czech Republic - Evaluation of potential accumulation in vegetables after application of biosolids, 2020, Chemosphere
  • Effect of pyrolysis temperature on removal of organic pollutants present in anaerobically stabilized sewage sludge, 2020, Chemosphere
  • Recovery of fen peatland microbiomes and predicted functional profiles after rewetting, 2020, The ISME Journal
  • Current knowledge in the field of algal organic matter adsorption onto activated carbon in drinking water treatment, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment

Tomáš Cajthaml has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Jaroslav Semerád, Alena Grasserová, Michael Komárek, Alena Filipová, and Zuzana Münzbergová.

The researcher has produced at least one book published by Springer Nature titled Advanced Nano-Bio Technologies for Water and Soil Treatment in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Occurrence of microplastics in raw and treated drinking water.

    Martin Pivokonsky;Lenka Cermakova;Katerina Novotna;Petra Peer

  • Microplastics in drinking water treatment - Current knowledge and research needs

    Katerina Novotna;Lenka Cermakova;Lenka Pivokonska;Tomas Cajthaml

  • Ligninolytic fungi in bioremediation: extracellular enzyme production and degradation rate

    Čeněk Novotný;Kateřina Svobodová;Pavla Erbanová;Tomáš Cajthaml

  • Seasonal dynamics of fungal communities in a temperate oak forest soil

    Jana Voříšková;Jana Voříšková;Vendula Brabcová;Tomáš Cajthaml;Tomáš Cajthaml;Petr Baldrian

  • Tree diversity and species identity effects on soil fungi, protists and animals are context dependent

    Leho Tedersoo;Mohammad Bahram;Tomáš Cajthaml;Sergei Põlme

  • Spatial variability of enzyme activities and microbial biomass in the upper layers of Quercus petraea forest soil

    Jaroslav Šnajdr;Vendula Valášková;Veˇra Merhautová;Jana Herinková

  • Responses of the extracellular enzyme activities in hardwood forest to soil temperature and seasonality and the potential effects of climate change

    Petr Baldrian;Jaroslav Šnajdr;Věra Merhautová;Petra Dobiášová

  • Transformation of Quercus petraea litter: successive changes in litter chemistry are reflected in differential enzyme activity and changes in the microbial community composition.

    Jaroslav Šnajdr;Tomáš Cajthaml;Vendula Valášková;Věra Merhautová

  • Biodegradation of endocrine-disrupting compounds and suppression of estrogenic activity by ligninolytic fungi.

    Tomáš Cajthaml;Zdena Křesinová;Kateřina Svobodová;Monika Möder

  • Is the effect of trees on soil properties mediated by soil fauna? A case study from post-mining sites

    Jan Frouz;Miluše Livečková;Jana Albrechtová;Alica Chroňáková

  • Purification of a new manganese peroxidase of the white-rot fungus Irpex lacteus, and degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by the enzyme.

    Petra Baborová;Monika Möder;Petr Baldrian;Kamila Cajthamlová

  • Enzymatic degradation of anthracene, dibenzothiophene and pyrene by manganese peroxidase in media containing acetone.

    Gemma Eibes;Tomas Cajthaml;Maria Teresa Moreira;Gumersindo Feijoo

  • Extracellular oxidative enzyme production and PAH removal in soil by exploratory mycelium of white rot fungi.

    Čeněk Novotný;Pavla Erbanová;Václav Šašek;Alena Kubátová

  • Estimation of fungal biomass in forest litter and soil

    Petr Baldrian;Tomáš Větrovský;Tomáš Cajthaml;Petra Dobiášová

  • Production of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes and degradation of leaf litter by saprotrophic basidiomycetes isolated from a Quercus petraea forest

    Vendula Valášková;Jaroslav Šnajdr;Britta Bittner;Tomáš Cajthaml

  • Decomposer food web in a deciduous forest shows high share of generalist microorganisms and importance of microbial biomass recycling.

    Ruben López-Mondéjar;Vendula Brabcová;Martina Štursová;Anna Davidová

  • Enzyme activities and microbial biomass in topsoil layer during spontaneous succession in spoil heaps after brown coal mining

    Petr Baldrian;Josef Trögl;Jan Frouz;Jaroslav Šnajdr

  • When the forest dies: the response of forest soil fungi to a bark beetle-induced tree dieback

    Martina Štursová;Jaroslav Šnajdr;Tomáš Cajthaml;Jiří Bárta

  • Distribution of microbial biomass and activity of extracellular enzymes in a hardwood forest soil reflect soil moisture content

    Petr Baldrian;Věra Merhautová;Mirka Petránková;Tomáš Cajthaml

  • Ecotoxicity and biodegradability of new brominated flame retardants: A review

    M. Ezechiáš;S. Covino;T. Cajthaml

  • Irpex lacteus, a white rot fungus applicable to water and soil bioremediation.

    Č. Novotný;P. Erbanová;T. Cajthaml;N. Rothschild

  • Preparation of titania mesoporous materialsusing a surfactant-mediated sol–gel method

    P. Kluson;P. Kacer;T. Cajthaml;M. Kalaji

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Frouz
Jan Frouz Charles University
Petr Baldrian
Petr Baldrian Czech Academy of Sciences
Stefano Covino
Stefano Covino National Institute for Astrophysics
Rosa Margesin
Rosa Margesin University of Innsbruck
Miroslav Černík
Miroslav Černík Technical University of Liberec
Marie Stiborová
Marie Stiborová Charles University
Hana Šantrůčková
Hana Šantrůčková University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Milan Gryndler
Milan Gryndler Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem
Miroslav Vosátka
Miroslav Vosátka Czech Academy of Sciences
Inmaculada García-Romera
Inmaculada García-Romera Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to numerous specialized online programs and diverse career paths. Many students pursue advanced degrees in healthcare management, offering strong prospects in hospital and clinical administration. If efficiency is a priority, consider a masters degree in healthcare management, designed for professionals who want to fast-track their leadership careers.

Some fields facilitate even faster transitions. For example, students interested in psychiatric care could consider the shortest pmhnp program, which helps experienced nurses become psychiatric nurse practitioners in less time.

Careers in nutrition and wellness are also in high demand. For those looking to quickly qualify, the fastest nutrition degree programs provide an accelerated path toward working as a registered dietitian or nutrition specialist.

Lastly, if affordability is key, students interested in business and healthcare intersecting should consider the affordable online mba healthcare management programs. These options let you build business expertise while keeping costs manageable and flexibility high.

Best Scientists Citing Tomáš Cajthaml

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles