World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
H. Martin Schaefer

H. Martin Schaefer

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
54
Citations
11059
World Ranking
3133
National Ranking
166

H. Martin Schaefer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Martin Schaefer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 146 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

H. Martin Schaefer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Martin Schaefer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

H. Martin Schaefer is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany and conducts research primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans various subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's research topics focus on Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Tree-ring climate responses, Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond, as well as Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis.

Among their recent scientific contributions are several peer-reviewed papers, including:

  • Rapid shift in methane carbon isotopes suggests microbial emissions drove record high atmospheric methane growth in 2020-2022 (2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Reassembly of a tropical rainforest: A new chronosequence in the Chocó tested with the recovery of tree attributes (2025, Ecosphere)
  • Using carbon-14 and carbon-13 measurements for source attribution of atmospheric methane in the Athabasca oil sands region (2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • Reassembly of a tropical rainforest ecosystem: A new chronosequence in the Ecuadorian Chocó tested with the recovery of tree attributes (2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Radiocarbon monoxide indicates increasing atmospheric oxidizing capacity (2025, Nature Communications)

Schaefer has frequently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and the SSRN Electronic Journal, with additional publications in Ecosphere, Nature Communications, and Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

Their regular collaborators include Felicity L. Newell, Jörg Müller, Nico Blüthgen, Constance J. Tremlett, and Sebastián Escobar, with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality

    Santiago Soliveres;Fons van der Plas;Peter Manning;Daniel Prati

  • Financial Costs of Meeting Global Biodiversity Conservation Targets: Current Spending and Unmet Needs

    Donal P. McCarthy;Donal P. McCarthy;Paul F. Donald;Jörn P. W. Scharlemann;Jörn P. W. Scharlemann;Graeme M. Buchanan

  • How plant¿animal interactions signal new insights in communication

    H. Martin Schaefer;Veronika Schaefer;Douglas J. Levey

  • Life history trade-offs are influenced by the diversity, availability and interactions of dietary antioxidants

    Carlo Catoni;Anne Peters;H. Martin Schaefer

  • Specialization on traits as basis for the niche‐breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks

    Robert R. Junker;Nico Blüthgen;Tanja Brehm;Julia Binkenstein

  • Morphology predicts species' functional roles and their degree of specialization in plant-frugivore interactions.

    D. Matthias Dehling;Pedro Jordano;H. Martin Schaefer;Katrin Böhning-Gaese

  • Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.

    H. Martin Schaefer;Nina Stobbe

  • Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations

    Carsten F. Dormann;Jochen Fründ;H. Martin Schaefer

  • Plant-Animal Communication

    H. Martin Schaefer;Graeme D. Ruxton

  • Deception in plants: mimicry or perceptual exploitation?

    H. Martin Schaefer;Graeme D. Ruxton

  • Specialization and interaction strength in a tropical plant-frugivore network differ among forest strata.

    Matthias Schleuning;Nico Blüthgen;Martina Flörchinger;Julius Braun

  • The origin and dynamic evolution of chemical information transfer

    Sandra Steiger;Thomas Schmitt;H. Martin Schaefer

  • Contemporary evolution of reproductive isolation and phenotypic divergence in sympatry along a migratory divide.

    Gregor Rolshausen;Gernot Segelbacher;Keith A. Hobson;H. Martin Schaefer

  • Are Fruit Colors Adapted to Consumer Vision and Birds Equally Efficient in Detecting Colorful Signals

    H. Martin Schaefer;Veronika Schaefer;Misha Vorobyev

  • Colour spaces in ecology and evolutionary biology.

    Julien P Renoult;Almut Kelber;H Martin Schaefer

  • Functional relationships beyond species richness patterns: trait matching in plant-bird mutualisms across scales

    D. Matthias Dehling;Till Töpfer;H. Martin Schaefer;Pedro Jordano

  • Locally rare species influence grassland ecosystem multifunctionality

    Santiago Soliveres;Peter Manning;Daniel Prati;Martin M. Gossner

  • Current threats faced by Neotropical parrot populations

    I. Berkunsky;Petra Quillfeldt;D. J. Brightsmith;M. C. Abbud

  • Why are fruits colorful? The relative importance of achromatic and chromatic contrasts for detection by birds

    Eliana Cazetta;Hinrich Martin Schaefer;Mauro Galetti

  • Testing the defence trade-off hypothesis: how contents of nutrients and secondary compounds affect fruit removal

    H. Martin Schaefer;V. Schmidt;H. Winkler

  • Plants on red alert: do insects pay attention?

    H. Martin Schaefer;Gregor Rolshausen

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme D. Ruxton
Graeme D. Ruxton University of St Andrews
Gernot Segelbacher
Gernot Segelbacher University of Freiburg
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Katrin Böhning-Gaese Goethe University Frankfurt
Matthias Schleuning
Matthias Schleuning Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Nico Blüthgen
Nico Blüthgen Technical University of Darmstadt
Kevin S. Gould
Kevin S. Gould Victoria University of Wellington
Wolfgang W. Weisser
Wolfgang W. Weisser Technical University of Munich
Steffen Oppel
Steffen Oppel Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
Markus Fischer
Markus Fischer University of Bern
Valentin H. Klaus
Valentin H. Klaus Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution often leads to discovering related pathways in healthcare and nursing, as both fields drive impactful change in science and society. Today, innovative online programs make it easier than ever to transition or advance within the medical industry—whether your interests lie in research, patient care, or public health.

For those considering nursing, understanding how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make is essential. Salary varies widely by state and can influence career decisions. If you’re looking for quick advancement, you may be interested in how to become nurse practitioner in the shortest time possible, as accelerated bridge programs allow for swift transitions.

Nurses looking to upskill may explore a rn to bsn in 6 months program for rapid advancement. Similarly, there are flexible options for those starting with an associate degree, such as using an asn to np bridge program to advance directly to a nurse practitioner role. These online pathways offer versatility and growth, making them attractive to students with varied backgrounds in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing H. Martin Schaefer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles