World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
12396
World Ranking
4783
National Ranking
2227

Björn Hartmann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Hartmann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Björn Hartmann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Hartmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Björn Hartmann is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research is situated within the field of Computer Science, with a concentration on several subfields including Human-Computer Interaction, Hardware and Architecture, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Information Systems and Management.

Their work spans a range of topics, prominently featuring Augmented Reality Applications, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Embedded Systems Design Techniques, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Real-Time Systems Scheduling, and Image and Video Quality Assessment.

Björn Hartmann has contributed to the following recent publications:

  • Interactive Mixed-Dimensional Media for Cross-Dimensional Collaboration in Mixed Reality Environments, 2022, Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • Opportunities and Challenges for Circuit Board Level Hardware Description Languages, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Predicting and Explaining Mobile UI Tappability with Vision Modeling and Saliency Analysis, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • OmniFill: Domain-Agnostic Form Filling Suggestions Using Multi-Faceted Context, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Knowledge-Component-Based Methodology for Evaluating AI Assistants, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their publications have appeared most frequently in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality

Björn Hartmann collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Balasaravanan Thoravi Kumaravel
  • Richard J. Lin
  • Eldon Schoop
  • Xin Zhou
  • Gang Li

Best Publications

  • Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside

    Michael S. Bernstein;Greg Little;Robert C. Miller;Björn Hartmann

  • How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design

    Scott R. Klemmer;Björn Hartmann;Leila Takayama

  • Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west

    Lena Mamykina;Bella Manoim;Manas Mittal;George Hripcsak

  • Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis

    Björn Hartmann;Scott R. Klemmer;Michael Bernstein;Leith Abdulla

  • Shepherding the crowd yields better work

    Steven Dow;Anand Kulkarni;Scott Klemmer;Björn Hartmann

  • Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with turkomatic

    Anand Kulkarni;Matthew Can;Björn Hartmann

  • What would other programmers do: suggesting solutions to error messages

    Björn Hartmann;Daniel MacDougall;Joel Brandt;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Turkomatic: automatic, recursive task and workflow design for mechanical turk

    Anand Kulkarni;Matthew Can;Björn Hartmann

  • Implementing expressive gesture synthesis for embodied conversational agents

    Björn Hartmann;Maurizio Mancini;Catherine Pelachaud

  • Implementing Expressive Gesture Synthesis for Embodied Conversational Agents

    Björn Hartmann;Maurizio Mancin;Catherine Pelachaud

  • Learning syntactic program transformations from examples

    Reudismam Rolim;Gustavo Soares;Loris D'Antoni;Oleksandr Polozov

  • Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition

    Björn Hartmann;Leith Abdulla;Manas Mittal;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: Understanding Opportunistic Design

    B. Hartmann;S. Doorley;S.R. Klemmer

  • Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system

    Derrick Coetzee;Armando Fox;Marti A. Hearst;Björn Hartmann

  • Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique

    Kurt Luther;Jari-Lee Tolentino;Wei Wu;Amy Pavel

  • Midas: fabricating custom capacitive touch sensors to prototype interactive objects

    Valkyrie Savage;Xiaohan Zhang;Björn Hartmann

  • Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning

    Björn Hartmann;Loren Yu;Abel Allison;Yeonsoo Yang

  • Programming by a sample: rapidly creating web applications with d.mix

    Björn Hartmann;Leslie Wu;Kevin Collins;Scott R. Klemmer

  • What's the right price? pricing tasks for finishing on time

    Siamak Faridani;Björn Hartmann;Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis

  • MixT: automatic generation of step-by-step mixed media tutorials

    Pei-Yu Chi;Sally Ahn;Amanda Ren;Mira Dontcheva

  • Proton: multitouch gestures as regular expressions

    Kenrick Kin;Björn Hartmann;Tony DeRose;Maneesh Agrawala

Frequent Co-Authors

Maneesh Agrawala
Maneesh Agrawala Stanford University
Scott R. Klemmer
Scott R. Klemmer University of California, San Diego
Steven Dow
Steven Dow University of California, San Diego
Hrvoje Benko
Hrvoje Benko Facebook (United States)
Marti A. Hearst
Marti A. Hearst University of California, Berkeley
Andrew D. Wilson
Andrew D. Wilson Microsoft (United States)
Catherine Pelachaud
Catherine Pelachaud Sorbonne University
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Prabal Dutta
Prabal Dutta University of California, Berkeley
George Fitzmaurice
George Fitzmaurice Autodesk (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring Computer Science in the USA, you may want to consider related online degree options that can boost your skills and career opportunities. Many reputable U.S. universities now offer flexible programs in STEM fields, allowing you to learn from anywhere.

Mechanical engineering is a strong alternative for students interested in working with machines, robotics, and manufacturing. For those seeking maximum affordability, check out the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs available.

Science enthusiasts may wonder, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—several institutions now provide accredited online physics degrees tailored for remote learners.

Data science continues to be in high demand. For budget-conscious students, knowing what is the cheapest data science course in the us? can help you break into this growing field without breaking the bank.

Finally, if you’re considering a career in technology infrastructure or electronics, explore your options for earning an electrical engineering degree online admissions. Each of these pathways offers unique career prospects and can often be tailored to your schedule and location.

Best Scientists Citing Björn Hartmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles