World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 42 8402 8165 3599 3463 160 7276

Steven Dow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven Dow between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven Dow published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2014. 19 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1999 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven Dow: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 7
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 8
2012 5
2013 14
2014 23
2015 15
2016 15
2017 12
2018 11
2019 7
2020 4
2021 9
2022 7
2023 4
2024 11
2025 8
Total 184
Download as CSV

Steven Dow publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Dow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 160 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 160
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven Dow D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Dow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 42
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven Dow is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their work explores topics that cover a range of interdisciplinary areas such as Design Education and Practice, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Open Source Software Innovations, Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing, Creativity in Education and Neuroscience, and Social Media and Politics.

Recent publications by Steven Dow include:

  • The Idea Machine: LLM-based Expansion, Rewriting, Combination, and Suggestion of Ideas (2022, Creativity and Cognition)
  • A Framework for Open Civic Design: Integrating Public Participation, Crowdsourcing, and Design Thinking (2021, Digital Government Research and Practice)
  • Critique Me (2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • MetaWriter: Exploring the Potential and Perils of AI Writing Support in Scientific Peer Review (2024, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • Framing Creative Work: Helping Novices Frame Better Problems through Interactive Scaffolding (2021, Creativity and Cognition)

Steven Dow frequently publishes in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Creativity and Cognition. Other venues of publication include arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, and Digital Government Research and Practice.

Collaborations with other researchers are an important aspect of Steven Dow's work. Frequent co-authors include Jude Rayan, Lu Sun, Stephen MacNeil, Zijian Ding, and X. X. Xu, reflecting a network of interdisciplinary partnerships across various topics related to their research fields.

Best Publications

  • Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy

    Steven P. Dow;Alana Glassco;Jonathan Kass;Melissa Schwarz

  • DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences

    Blair MacIntyre;Maribeth Gandy;Steven Dow;Jay David Bolter

  • Shepherding the crowd yields better work

    Steven Dow;Anand Kulkarni;Scott Klemmer;Björn Hartmann

  • DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences

    Blair MacIntyre;Maribeth Gandy;Steven Dow;Jay David Bolter

  • The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints

    Steven P. Dow;Kate Heddleston;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Wizard of Oz support throughout an iterative design process

    S. Dow;B. MacIntyre;J. Lee;C. Oezbek

  • Prototyping dynamics: sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results

    Steven Dow;Julie Fortuna;Dan Schwartz;Beth Altringer

  • Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique

    Kurt Luther;Jari-Lee Tolentino;Wei Wu;Amy Pavel

  • Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration

    Joel Chan;Steven P. Dow;Christian D. Schunn

  • Presence and engagement in an interactive drama

    Steven Dow;Manish Mehta;Ellie Harmon;Blair MacIntyre

  • Exploring spatial narratives and mixed reality experiences in Oakland Cemetery

    Steven Dow;Jaemin Lee;Christopher Oezbek;Blair Maclntyre

  • Generating implications for design through design research

    Corina Sas;Steve Whittaker;Steven Dow;Jodi Forlizzi

  • Toward Collaborative Ideation at Scale: Leveraging Ideas from Others to Generate More Creative and Diverse Ideas

    Pao Siangliulue;Kenneth C. Arnold;Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Steven P. Dow

  • Almost an Expert: The Effects of Rubrics and Expertise on Perceived Value of Crowdsourced Design Critiques

    Alvin Yuan;Kurt Luther;Markus Krause;Sophie Isabel Vennix

  • Personality Matters: Balancing for Personality Types Leads to Better Outcomes for Crowd Teams

    Ioanna Lykourentzou;Angeliki Antoniou;Yannick Naudet;Steven P. Dow

  • Providing Timely Examples Improves the Quantity and Quality of Generated Ideas

    Pao Siangliulue;Joel Chan;Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Steven P. Dow

  • Graphologue: Exploring Large Language Model Responses with Interactive Diagrams

    Unknown

  • Glance: rapidly coding behavioral video with the crowd

    Walter S. Lasecki;Mitchell Gordon;Danai Koutra;Malte F. Jung

  • The design and testing of a force feedback dental simulator

    Geb Thomas;Lyiii Johnson;Steven Dow;Clark Stanford

  • Improving Crowd Innovation with Expert Facilitation

    Joel Chan;Steven Dang;Steven P. Dow

  • IdeaHound: Improving Large-scale Collaborative Ideation with Crowd-Powered Real-time Semantic Modeling

    Pao Siangliulue;Joel Chan;Steven P. Dow;Krzysztof Z. Gajos

  • ConsensUs: Supporting Multi-Criteria Group Decisions by Visualizing Points of Disagreement

    Weichen Liu;Sijia Xiao;Jacob T. Browne;Ming Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Blair MacIntyre
Blair MacIntyre Georgia Institute of Technology
Elizabeth M. Gerber
Elizabeth M. Gerber Northwestern University
Scott R. Klemmer
Scott R. Klemmer University of California, San Diego
Jeffrey P. Bigham
Jeffrey P. Bigham Carnegie Mellon University
Brian P. Bailey
Brian P. Bailey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Krzysztof Z. Gajos
Krzysztof Z. Gajos Harvard University
Björn Hartmann
Björn Hartmann University of California, Berkeley
Michael Mateas
Michael Mateas University of California, Santa Cruz
Christian D. Schunn
Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As demand grows for tech talent, online education offers accessible routes to computer science and related fields. If affordability is a concern, explore cheap online colleges that provide quality programs at a lower cost. These schools often offer flexible schedules, making it easier to balance studies with work or other commitments.

Students with less-than-perfect academic records can find online schools that accept low gpa, opening up opportunities for individuals who might otherwise struggle to enroll in traditional degree programs.

While computer science is a popular path, related fields like environmental science also yield promising futures. There are high-paying jobs with environmental science degree credentials, including roles in data analysis, research, and engineering—a great option for those interested in technology and sustainability.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, some schools offer a 2-year computer science degree online. Accelerated programs can fast-track your technical expertise and help you start a rewarding career sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Dow

Trending Scientists