World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9513
World Ranking
7495
National Ranking
3261

Brian P. Bailey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian P. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Brian P. Bailey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian P. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2014 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Brian P. Bailey is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within psychology and computer science, focusing on areas related to team dynamics, performance, and innovative educational methods.

The main fields of study for Brian P. Bailey include:

  • Psychology
  • Computer Science

Within these broader categories, their work specifically addresses subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Information Systems
  • Education
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Brian P. Bailey's research topics cover a range of subjects notably including:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing

The scientist has published extensively in venues such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, which features ten of their papers. Other publication venues include Creativity and Cognition, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, the Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Some recent papers by Brian P. Bailey include:

  • To Err is AI: Imperfect Interventions and Repair in a Conversational Agent Facilitating Group Chat Discussions (2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • How Should the Agent Communicate to the Group? Communication Strategies of a Conversational Agent in Group Chat Discussions (2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • Plan Early, Revise More (2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • Better Feedback from Nicer People (2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • Challenges and Opportunities for Data-Centric Peer Evaluation Tools for Teamwork (2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)

Frequent collaborators with Brian P. Bailey include:

  • Jaewook Lee
  • Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran
  • Hyo Jin
  • Ha-Kyung Kong
  • Karrie Karahalios

The scientist has received recognition from the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), having been named an ACM Senior Member in 2014 and an ACM Distinguished Member in 2018.

Best Publications

  • If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution

    Piotr D. Adamczyk;Brian P. Bailey

  • On the need for attention-aware systems : Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state

    Brian P. Bailey;Joseph A. Konstan

  • Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Xianjun Sam Zheng;Brian P. Bailey

  • The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface

    Brian P. Bailey;Joseph A. Konstan;John V. Carlis

  • Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia

    Rainer Lienhart;Anand R. Prasad;Alan Hanjalic;Sunghyun Choi

  • Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management

    Brian P. Bailey;Shamsi T. Iqbal

  • Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice

    Scarlett R. Herring;Chia-Chen Chang;Jesse Krantzler;Brian P. Bailey

  • Show me the money!: an analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns

    Anbang Xu;Xiao Yang;Huaming Rao;Wai-Tat Fu

  • Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Piotr D. Adamczyk;Xianjun Sam Zheng;Brian P. Bailey

  • Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Brian P. Bailey

  • Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Brian P. Bailey

  • Measuring the effects of interruptions on task performance in the user interface

    B.P. Bailey;J.A. Konstan;J.V. Carlis

  • Voyant: generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts

    Anbang Xu;Shih-Wen Huang;Brian Bailey

  • Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique

    Kurt Luther;Jari-Lee Tolentino;Wei Wu;Amy Pavel

  • BeThere: 3D mobile collaboration with spatial input

    Rajinder S. Sodhi;Brett R. Jones;David Forsyth;Brian P. Bailey

  • Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Brian P. Bailey

  • Use, disuse, and misuse of automated refactorings

    Mohsen Vakilian;Nicholas Chen;Stas Negara;Balaji Ambresh Rajkumar

  • Oasis: A framework for linking notification delivery to the perceptual structure of goal-directed tasks

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Brian P. Bailey

  • DEMAIS: designing multimedia applications with interactive storyboards

    Brian P. Bailey;Joseph A. Konstan;John V. Carlis

  • TEAM STORM: demonstrating an interaction model for working with multiple ideas during creative group work

    Joshua Hailpern;Erik Hinterbichler;Caryn Leppert;Damon Cook

  • Understanding Changes in Mental Workload during Task Execution

    Shamsi T. Iqbal;Piotr D. Adamczyk;Xianjun S. Zheng;Brian P. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Shamsi T. Iqbal
Shamsi T. Iqbal Microsoft (United States)
Joseph A. Konstan
Joseph A. Konstan University of Minnesota
Steven Dow
Steven Dow University of California, San Diego
Karrie Karahalios
Karrie Karahalios University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Elizabeth M. Gerber
Elizabeth M. Gerber Northwestern University
Alan Hanjalic
Alan Hanjalic Delft University of Technology
Darko Marinov
Darko Marinov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David Forsyth
David Forsyth University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nicu Sebe
Nicu Sebe University of Trento
Sunghyun Choi
Sunghyun Choi Samsung (South Korea)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA also opens doors to a wide range of specialized career pathways. Today, fully online degrees make high-quality education more accessible than ever. Whether you aim to launch your tech career or advance in your current field, selecting what are the best online universities can set a strong foundation for your journey.

For those interested in interactive entertainment, pursuing a game design degree online offers hands-on skills in game development and design, preparing graduates for dynamic roles in the gaming industry. Alternatively, a master's degree in cybersecurity online equips learners with advanced knowledge to protect organizations from cyber threats – a rapidly growing field with high demand.

Computer Science skills are also highly valued in traditional sectors. Earning a masters in construction management blends tech expertise with project leadership, opening opportunities in the evolving construction industry. With such diverse pathways, students can align their studies with their career goals and the future of work.

Best Scientists Citing Brian P. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles