World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lisa S. Meredith

Lisa S. Meredith

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
11941
World Ranking
4569
National Ranking
2536

Lisa S. Meredith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa S. Meredith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lisa S. Meredith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa S. Meredith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa S. Meredith is affiliated with the RAND Corporation in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to health professions, psychology, and medicine, with particular focus on subfields such as general health professions, clinical psychology, social psychology, epidemiology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their main research topics include:

  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

Meredith has contributed to research published in a range of academic venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Women's Health Issues
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Predictors of burnout among US healthcare providers: a systematic review, 2022, BMJ Open
  • Design of CLARO (Collaboration Leading to Addiction Treatment and Recovery from other Stresses): A randomized trial of collaborative care for opioid use disorder and co-occurring depression and/or posttraumatic stress disorder, 2021, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Protecting the mental and physical well-being of frontline health care workers during COVID-19: Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial, 2022, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Understanding Gender Sensitivity of the Health Care Workforce at the Veterans Health Administration, 2020, Women's Health Issues
  • Association Between Difficulty with VA Patient-Centered Medical Home Model Components and Provider Emotional Exhaustion and Intent to Remain in Practice, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine

Coauthors who frequently collaborate with Meredith include:

  • Katherine E. Watkins
  • Courtney A. Gidengil
  • Miriam Komaromy
  • Karen Chan Osilla
  • Eunice C. Wong

Meredith has a substantial number of book publications with RAND Corporation eBooks, with titles focusing on topics related to mental health, stress prevention, public awareness campaigns, and strategies for addiction treatment implementation. Some notable book titles are:

  • After Hurricane Maria: Predisaster Conditions, Hurricane Damage, and Recovery Needs in Puerto Rico, 2020
  • Burnout: Definition, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Interventions Literature Reviews, 2022
  • CLARO Intervention User Manual: A Guide for Care Teams and Individual Practitioners, 2023
  • Posttraumatic Stress in California's Workers' Compensation System: A Study of Mental Health Presumptions for Firefighters and Peace Officers Under Senate Bill 542, 2021
  • CLARO Implementation Manual: Strategies and Supports for Successful Implementation of the CLARO Intervention, 2023

Best Publications

  • Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: A randomized controlled trial.

    Kenneth B. Wells;Cathy D. Sherbourne;Michael Schoenbaum;Naihua Duan

  • The acceptability of treatment for depression among African-American, Hispanic, and white primary care patients

    Lisa A. Cooper;Junius J. Gonzales;Joseph J. Gallo;Kathryn M. Rost

  • Who Is at Risk of Nondetection of Mental Health Problems in Primary Care

    Steven J. Borowsky;Lisa V. Rubenstein;Lisa S. Meredith;Patricia Camp

  • Interventions in Organizational and Community Context: A Framework for Building Evidence on Dissemination and Implementation in Health Services Research

    Peter Mendel;Lisa S. Meredith;Michael Schoenbaum;Michael Schoenbaum;Cathy D. Sherbourne

  • Caring for Depression

    Kenneth B. Wells;Roland Sturm;Cathy D. Sherbourne;Lisa S. Meredith

  • Cost-effectiveness of practice-initiated quality improvement for depression: results of a randomized controlled trial.

    Michael Schoenbaum;Jurgen Unutzer;Cathy D. Sherbourne;Naihua Duan

  • Impact of Teen Depression on Academic, Social, and Physical Functioning

    Lisa H. Jaycox;Bradley D. Stein;Susan M. Paddock;Jeremy N. V. Miles

  • Building Community Resilience to Disasters: A Way Forward to Enhance National Health Security

    Anita Chandra;Joie D. Acosta;Stefanie Howard;Lori Uscher-Pines

  • Invisible Wounds of War. Summary and Recommendations for Addressing Psychological and Cognitive Injuries

    Terry Tanielian;Lisa H. Haycox;Terry L. Schell;Grant N. Marshall

  • Brief motivational interviewing for teens at risk of substance use consequences: a randomized pilot study in a primary care clinic.

    Elizabeth J. D'Amico;Jeremy N.V. Miles;Stefanie A. Stern;Lisa S. Meredith

  • Comorbid Anxiety Disorder and the Functioning and Well-being of Chronically Ill Patients of General Medical Providers

    Cathy Donald Sherbourne;Kenneth B. Wells;Lisa S. Meredith;Catherine A. Jackson

  • Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression

    Sarah L. Clever;Daniel E. Ford;Lisa V. Rubenstein;Kathryn M. Rost

  • Social support and stressful life events: age differences in their effects on health-related quality of life among the chronically ill.

    Cathy Donald Sherbourne;L. S. Meredith;William H. Rogers;John E. Ware Jr.

  • Invisible Wounds of War

    Terri Tanielian;Lisa H. Jaycox;David M. Adamson;M. Audrey Burnam

  • Long-term effectiveness of disseminating quality improvement for depression in primary care

    Cathy D. Sherbourne;Kenneth B. Wells;Naihua Duan;Jeanne Miranda

  • The Effect of Adherence to Practice Guidelines on Depression Outcomes

    Kimberly A. Hepner;Melissa Rowe;Kathryn Rost;Scot C. Hickey

  • Outcomes for adult outpatients with depression under prepaid or fee-for-service financing.

    Rogers Wh;Wells Kb;Meredith Ls;Sturm R

  • Trust influences response to public health messages during a bioterrorist event.

    Lisa S. Meredith;David Eisenman;Hilary J. Rhodes;Gery W. Ryan

  • Testing for Statistical Discrimination in Health Care

    Ana I Balsa;Thomas G McGuire;Lisa S Meredith

  • Prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders in primary care outpatients

    Cathy D. Sherbourne;Catherine A. Jackson;Lisa S. Meredith;Patricia Camp

  • Cost-effectiveness of practice-initiated quality improvement for depression

    Michael Schoenbaum;Jurgen Unutzer;Cathy D. Sherbourne;Naihua Duan

  • Brief Motivational Interviewing for Teens at Risk of Substance Use Consequences

    Elizabeth J. D'Amico;Jeremy N. V. Miles;Stefanie Howard;Lisa S. Meredith

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth B. Wells
Kenneth B. Wells University of California, Los Angeles
Cathy D. Sherbourne
Cathy D. Sherbourne RAND Corporation
Terri Tanielian
Terri Tanielian RAND Corporation
Steven M. Asch
Steven M. Asch Stanford University
Elizabeth J. D'Amico
Elizabeth J. D'Amico RAND Corporation
William H. Rogers
William H. Rogers Tufts Medical Center
M. Audrey Burnam
M. Audrey Burnam RAND Corporation
Lisa H. Jaycox
Lisa H. Jaycox RAND Corporation
Daniel E. Ford
Daniel E. Ford Johns Hopkins University
Bradley D. Stein
Bradley D. Stein RAND Corporation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths, many of which can be started with flexible online degree options. One popular route is becoming a licensed mental health counselor, but requirements can vary significantly by location.

For example, those exploring mental health counselor requirements in Nashville will find a specific set of educational and licensing steps to follow. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Louisiana should review the New Orleans mental health counselor certification requirements.

In cities like New York, the path to licensure can involve additional considerations. Learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in New York City. For those looking to practice in New Jersey, it is essential to understand the Newark mental health counselor certification requirements.

With evolving online degree programs and specific state licensing requirements, aspiring psychology professionals should always research local regulations to ensure they meet all necessary criteria for their chosen career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa S. Meredith

Trending Scientists