World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
51617
World Ranking
7826
National Ranking
4078

William H. Rogers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 266 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William H. Rogers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William H. Rogers is affiliated with Tufts Medical Center in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Health Professions and Medicine. Their work focuses notably on General Health Professions and intersects with subfields such as Infectious Diseases, Emergency Medicine, Social Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics explored in their research include workplace health and well-being, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, HIV-related health complications and treatments, HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment, as well as mental health treatment and access.

Significant recent publications authored or coauthored by William H. Rogers include:

  • Performance of a short, self-report adherence scale in a probability sample of persons using HIV antiretroviral therapy in the United States, 2020, published in AIDS
  • Effect of Adding a Work-Focused Intervention to Integrated Care for Depression in the Veterans Health Administration, 2020, published in JAMA Network Open
  • Research on the Tufts Be Well at Work Program for Employees With Depression: 2005-2020, 2021, published in Psychiatric Services
  • A Population-Based Survey of the Workplace Costs for Caregivers of Persons With Treatment-Resistant Depression Compared With Other Health Conditions, 2020, published in Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • FREE-LIVING COMPARABILITY OF THIGH-AND POCKET-WORN ACTIVITY MONITORS, 2025, published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Frequent coauthors collaborating with William H. Rogers include Debra Lerner, David A. Adler, Ira B. Wilson, Yunfeng Tie, and Mabel Padilla. These collaborative efforts are reflected across multiple publications, particularly in topics related to depression, workplace health, and HIV/AIDS research.

William H. Rogers' research has appeared in a variety of academic journals, with multiple papers published in venues such as AIDS, JAMA Network Open, Psychiatric Services, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. This diversity indicates involvement in both clinical and public health-related research arenas.

Best Publications

  • The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study

    Kenneth B. Wells;Anita L. Stewart;Ron D. Hays;M. Audrey Burnam

  • Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

    Anita L. Stewart;Sheldon Greenfield;Ron D. Hays;Kenneth Wells

  • Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study

    John E. Ware Jr.;M. Kosinski;Martha S. Bayliss;Colleen A. McHorney

  • The Functioning and Well-Being of Depressed Patients

    Kenneth B. Wells;Anita Stewart;Ron D. Hays;M. Audrey Burnam

  • Functional Status and Well-Being of Patients with Chronic Conditions

    Anita Stewart;Sheldon Greenfield;Ron D. Hays;Kenneth B. Wells

  • Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care.

    Dana Gelb Safran;Deborah A. Taira;William H. Rogers;Mark Kosinski

  • Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

    M. Robin DiMatteo;Cathy Donald Sherbourne;Ron D. Hays;Lynn Ordway

  • The Work Limitations Questionnaire.

    Debra Lerner;Benjamin C. Amick Iii;William H. Rogers;Susan Malspeis

  • The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

    Colleen A. McHorney;John E. Ware Jr.;William H. Rogers;Anastasia E. Raczek

  • Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.

    Robert H. Brook;John E. Ware;William H. Rogers;Emmett B. Keeler

  • A Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Prepaid Group Practice on Use of Services

    Willard G. Manning;Arleen Leibowitz;George A. Goldberg;William H. Rogers

  • The Primary Care Assessment Survey Tests of Data Quality and Measurement Performance

    Dana Gelb Safran;Mark Kosinski;Alvin R. Tarlov;William H. Rogers

  • Variations in Resource Utilization Among Medical Specialties and Systems of Care: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study

    Sheldon Greenfield;Eugene C. Nelson;Michael Zubkoff;Willard G. Manning Jr.

  • Characteristics of Physicians with Participatory Decision-Making Styles

    Sherrie H. Kaplan;Sheldon Greenfield;Barbara Gandek;William H. Rogers

  • Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

    John E. Ware;Martha S. Bayliss;William H. Rogers;Mark Kosinski

  • Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

    Sherrie H. Kaplan;Barbara Gandek;Sheldon Greenfield;William H. Rogers

  • Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study

    Haya R. Rubin;Barbara Gandek;William H. Rogers;Mark Kosinski

  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Served by the Department of Veterans Affairs Results From the Veterans Health Study

    Lewis E. Kazis;Donald R. Miller;Jack Clark;Katherine Skinner

  • Recall of recommendations and adherence to advice among patients with chronic medical conditions.

    Richard L. Kravitz;Ron D. Hays;Cathy Donald Sherbourne;M. Robin DiMatteo

  • Job performance deficits due to depression.

    David A. Adler;Thomas J. McLaughlin;William H. Rogers;Hong Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Brook
Robert H. Brook RAND Corporation
John E. Ware
John E. Ware University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Ira B. Wilson
Ira B. Wilson Brown University
Katherine L. Kahn
Katherine L. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles
Emmett B. Keeler
Emmett B. Keeler RAND Corporation
Kenneth B. Wells
Kenneth B. Wells University of California, Los Angeles
Sheldon Greenfield
Sheldon Greenfield University of California, Irvine
Joseph P. Newhouse
Joseph P. Newhouse Harvard University
Ron D. Hays
Ron D. Hays University of California, Los Angeles
Lewis E. Kazis
Lewis E. Kazis Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine is not the only way to enter the healthcare field. There are a variety of related online degrees and alternative career pathways that can offer flexibility and rewarding opportunities. Many prospective healthcare professionals consider nursing as a first step. If you’re wondering, do you have to take a teas test for lpn, you’ll find that some top nursing schools no longer require entrance exams, making the process more accessible.

For those interested in advancing quickly, there are accelerated healthcare programs that can help you move into administrative or leadership roles faster than traditional degrees. Nurses looking to upgrade their qualifications may consider asn to nurse practitioner programs, which provide efficient pathways toward becoming a nurse practitioner.

Additionally, for those interested in preventative care and wellness, pursuing one of the best online nutrition programs can open doors to careers in dietetics, wellness coaching, and public health. Exploring these related options can help you find the right educational and career path within the broader healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles