World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 31 7505 6972 3657 3333 115 4646

Franklin J. Boster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franklin J. Boster between 1977 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franklin J. Boster published across 48 years, from 1977 to 2024, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2001. 1 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2001. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 10 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1977 2024

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franklin J. Boster: publications per year, 1977 to 2024
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 4
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 10
2002 2
2003 5
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 5
2008 4
2009 8
2010 3
2011 5
2012 8
2013 3
2014 3
2015 3
2016 4
2017 2
2018 1
2019 4
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 118
Download as CSV

Franklin J. Boster publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franklin J. Boster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 115
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Franklin J. Boster D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franklin J. Boster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210 31
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Franklin J. Boster is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a particular focus on sociology, political science, social and intergroup psychology, and applied psychology.

Their work covers a range of main topics that include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Media Influence and Health

Key recent publications by Boster and collaborators include:

  • "Reconsidering the Problem of Common-Method Variance in Organizational Communication Research," 2024, Management Communication Quarterly
  • "The dynamic theory of reasoned action: evidence for a reverse causal process in the context of WHO handwashing guidelines," 2021, Psychology and Health
  • "Opinion Leaders," 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology
  • "The Suasory Force of Sticky Messages: A Replication and Extension," 2022, Western Journal of Communication
  • "Female Gamer Stereotypes Scale," 2022, PsycTESTS Dataset

Their frequent coauthors consist of several researchers with whom Boster has collaborated on multiple occasions, including:

  • Morgan E. Ellithorpe
  • David R. Ewoldsen
  • Brian Manata
  • Reed M. Reynolds
  • Sung-Jin Park

Publication venues where Boster's research has appeared include:

  • Management Communication Quarterly
  • Psychology and Health
  • The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology
  • Western Journal of Communication
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Boster's work bridges social science theory and applied research, particularly in areas related to communication, behavioral health interventions, and social influences on attitudes and behaviors. The blend of topics in their publications reflects an interdisciplinary approach involving psychology, communication studies, and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies

    Kim B. Serota;Timothy R. Levine;Franklin J. Boster

  • Fear-Arousing Persuasive Messages

    Franklin J. Boster;Paul Mongeau

  • Compliance‐gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences

    Gerald Miller;Frank Boster;Michael E. Roloff;David Seibold

  • Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the Machiavellianism dimension

    John E. Hunter;David W. Gerbing;Franklin J. Boster

  • On Making Progress in Communication Science

    Franklin J. Boster

  • Identifying Influence: Development and Validation of the Connectivity, Persuasiveness, and Maven Scales

    Franklin J. Boster;Michael R. Kotowski;Kyle R. Andrews;Kim Serota;Kim Serota

  • Development and Validation of Value-, Outcome-, and Impression-Relevant Involvement Scales:

    Hyunyi Cho;Franklin J. Boster

  • Effects of Gain Versus Loss Frame Antidrug Ads on Adolescents

    Hyunyi Cho;Franklin J. Boster

  • A model of compliance‐gaining message selection

    John E. Hunter;Franklin J. Boster

  • The roles of obligation and gratitude in explaining the effect of favors on compliance

    Ryan Goei;Franklin J. Boster

  • Some Effects of Video Streaming on Educational Achievement.

    Franklin J. Boster;Gary S. Meyer;Anthony J. Roberto;Carol Inge

  • The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups

    Michael G. Cruz;Franklin J. Boster;Jóse I. Rodríguez

  • Modeling the ego-defensive function of attitudes

    Maria Knight Lapinski;Franklin J. Boster

  • Individual differences and compliance gaining message selection: The effects of verbal aggressivencess, argumentativeness, dogmatism, and negativism

    Franklin J. Boster;Timothy Levine

  • The impact of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness on strategic diversity and persistence in compliance‐gaining behavior

    Franklin J. Boster;Timothy Levine;Dean Kazoleas

  • Adolescents' decisions about verbal and physical aggression an application of the theory of reasoned action

    Anthony J. Roberto;Gary Meyer;Franklin J. Boster;Heather L. Roberto

  • Cognitive processing: Additional thoughts and a reply to Petty, Kasmer, Haugtvedt, and Cacioppo

    James B. Stiff;Franklin J. Boster

  • The impact of guilt and type of compliance‐gaining message on compliance

    Franklin J. Boster;Monique M. Mitchell;Maria Knight Lapinski;Heather Cooper

  • First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents

    Hyunyi Cho;Franklin J. Boster

  • Dropping out of high school: A meta-analysis assessing the effect of messages in the home and in school

    Renee E. Strom;Franklin J. Boster

  • The Relative Effectiveness of a Direct Request Message and a Pregiving Message on Friends and Strangers

    Franklin J. Boster;José I. Rodríguez;Michael G. Cruz;Linda Marshall

  • Matching messages to the values underlying value-expressive and social-adjustive attitudes: reconciling an old theory with a contemporary measurement approach

    Craig R. Hullett;Franklin J. Boster

  • The Impact of Video Streaming on Mathematics Performance

    Franklin J. Boster;Gary S. Meyer;Anthony J. Roberto;Lisa Lindsey;Lisa Lindsey

  • Leader-member exchange development: a hospitality antecedent investigation

    Carl P. Borchgrevink;Franklin J. Boster

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy R. Levine
Timothy R. Levine University of Oklahoma
John E. Hunter
John E. Hunter Michigan State University
Michael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht Pennsylvania State University
Maria Knight Lapinski
Maria Knight Lapinski Michigan State University
Kenzie A. Cameron
Kenzie A. Cameron Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The growing number of flexible degree options makes pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities studies in the USA more accessible than ever. If you’re interested in psychology, an online masters in psychology allows students to gain expertise and prepare for roles in counseling, research, or organizational settings—all while studying remotely and often at a lower cost.

For those seeking a faster pathway to scholarly or teaching roles, accelerated edd programs offer a way to complete a Doctor of Education degree in a shorter timeframe. Similarly, if you want to advance your qualifications quickly, you can consider a 1 year online masters for a brief but intensive master’s experience.

Undergraduates can also benefit from online accelerated bachelor degree programs designed for fast track progress, helping graduates enter the workforce sooner. These options support diverse career pathways in education, mental health, public administration, and many other fields rooted in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Franklin J. Boster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles