World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
19302
World Ranking
4307
National Ranking
2403

Mike Allen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Allen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mike Allen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Allen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike Allen is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences, primarily focusing on psychology and its interdisciplinary connections.

The main fields of study guiding their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broad domains, their research explores several subfields:

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Mike Allen's topics of investigation are notably diverse and include:

  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Media Influence and Health
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges

Recent academic papers authored or coauthored by Mike Allen demonstrate this varied focus. Key publications include:

  • Is the Pencil Mightier than the Keyboard? A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Method of Notetaking Outcomes, 2020, Southern Communication Journal
  • Experiences of International Teaching Assistants in the US Classroom, 2020, Journal of International Students
  • "Imagine All the People": Imagined Interactions in Virtual Reality When Public Speaking, 2020, Imagination Cognition and Personality
  • Narcissism as a predictor of number of selfies: a cross-cultural examination of Japanese and American postings, 2021, Communication Research Reports
  • Exploring Eye Contact in Virtual Environments: The Compositor Mirror Tool, Areas of Interest, and Public Speaking Competency, 2021, Communication Studies

These publications reflect collaborative ties with frequent coauthors such as:

  • Luke LeFebvre
  • Leah E. LeFebvre
  • Comfort Tosin Adebayo
  • John Bourhis
  • Kikuko Omori

Mike Allen's research has been disseminated through various venues which include:

  • The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology
  • Journal of International Students
  • Southern Communication Journal
  • Imagination Cognition and Personality
  • Communication Research Reports

Best Publications

  • A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns

    Kim Witte;Mike Allen

  • Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis.

    Kathryn Dindia;Mike Allen

  • Comparing Student Satisfaction with Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis

    Mike Allen;John Bourhis;Nancy Burrell;Edward Mabry

  • Media bias in presidential elections: a meta-analysis

    Dave D'Alessio;Mike Allen

  • A meta‐analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning

    Paul L. Witt;Lawrence R. Wheeless;Mike Allen

  • Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire

    Vernon D. Miller;Mike Allen;Mary K. Casey;John R. Johnson

  • A Meta-Analysis Summarizing the Effects of Pornography II Aggression After Exposure

    Mike Allen;Dave D'Alessio;Keri Brezgel

  • The Role of Teacher Immediacy as a Motivational Factor in Student Learning: Using Meta-Analysis to Test a Causal Model

    Mike Allen;Paul L. Witt;Lawrence R. Wheeless

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Comparison Using Meta-Analysis

    Mike Allen;Edward Mabry;Michelle Mattrey;John Bourhis

  • Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta‐analysis

    Mike Allen;Raymond W. Preiss

  • Does Facebook make you lonely

    Hayeon Song;Anne Zmyslinski-Seelig;Jinyoung Kim;Adam Drent

  • Meta‐analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one‐sided and two‐sided messages

    Mike Allen

  • Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis

    David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen;Mark R. Klinger;Beverly Roskos-Ewoldsen

  • Exposure to Pornography and Acceptance of Rape Myths

    Mike Allen;Tara Emmers;Laura Gebhardt;Mary A. Giery

  • Meta‐analysis of self‐report data on the effectiveness of public speaking anxiety treatment techniques

    Mike Allen;John E. Hunter;William A. Donohue

  • Comparing the Impact of Homosexual and Heterosexual Parents on Children: Meta-Analysis of Existing Research.

    Mike Allen;Nancy Burrell

  • An evidence base for patient-centered cancer care: a meta-analysis of studies of observed communication between cancer specialists and their patients.

    Maria K. Venetis;Jeffrey D. Robinson;Katie La Plant Turkiewicz;Mike Allen

  • Comparing The Influence Of Parents And Peers On The Choice To Use Drugs: A Meta-Analytic Summary of the Literature

    Mike Allen;William A. Donohue;Amy Griffin;Dan Ryan

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Forensics and Communication Education on Critical Thinking.

    Mike Allen;Sandra Berkowitz;Steve Hunt;Allan Louden

  • Evaluating peer mediation outcomes in educational settings: A meta‐analytic review

    Nancy A. Burrell;Cindy S. Zirbel;Mike Allen

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy R. Levine
Timothy R. Levine University of Oklahoma
Geert Duysters
Geert Duysters Tilburg University
John E. Hunter
John E. Hunter Michigan State University
Jeffrey D. Robinson
Jeffrey D. Robinson Portland State University
Kim Witte
Kim Witte Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often overlaps with the field of social work. Many students consider online degrees for flexibility and accessibility. However, it’s crucial to understand each state’s requirements when planning your academic journey and future career.

For example, Maryland education requirements for social workers highlight the need for specialized degrees and licensure at different levels. Similarly, students should be aware of the Massachusetts minimum degree requirement for social workers before enrolling in an online program.

If you’re interested in practice in the Midwest, you’ll want to research the degree needed to be a social worker in Michigan or discover the social worker education requirements in Minnesota. Each state has its own licensing pathways, which may impact your educational choices and career prospects.

By understanding these requirements early, you can select an online psychology or social work program that sets you up for your desired state licensure and professional success.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Allen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles