World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
13290
World Ranking
5491
National Ranking
2597

John J. Clement publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Clement sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John J. Clement D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Clement sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

John J. Clement is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, including computer science, psychology, and engineering, with a focus on several specialized subfields.

The primary fields of study for their work are:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology
  • Engineering

Within these fields, their subfields of specialization include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Mechanical Engineering

The main topics addressed in their research publications cover:

  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Design Education and Practice
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques

Their recent papers include:

  • Multiple Levels of Heuristic Reasoning Processes in Scientific Model Construction, 2022, Frontiers in Psychology

John J. Clement has published a book titled Quantitative problem solving processes in children. This book was released in 2023 through UMI Dissertation Service eBooks.

Their frequent publication venue is Frontiers in Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics

    John J. Clement

  • Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics

    John Clement

  • Algebra Word Problem Solutions: Thought Processes Underlying a Common Misconception

    John J. Clement

  • Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions

    John Clement;David E. Brown;Aletta Zietsman

  • Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning : Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction

    David E. Brown;John Clement

  • Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and model viability

    John J. Clement

  • Model based learning as a key research area for science education

    John Clement

  • Translation Difficulties in Learning Mathematics

    John Clement;Jack Lochhead;George S. Monk

  • Effects of Student-Generated Diagrams versus Student-Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics.

    Janice D. Gobert;John J. Clement

  • Learning via Model Construction and Criticism

    John Clement

  • A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students

    John J. Clement

  • Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation

    John J. Clement

  • Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving

    John J. Clement

  • The Concept of Variation and Misconceptions in Cartesian Graphing.

    John J. Clement

  • Learning without understanding: The effect of tutoring strategies on algebra misconceptions.

    Peter Rosnick;John Clement

  • Model based learning and instruction in science

    John J. Clement;Mary Anne Rea-Ramirez

  • Step-Wise Evolution of Mental Models of Electric Circuits: A "Learning-Aloud" Case Study

    John J. Clement;Melvin S. Steinberg

  • The Role of Explanatory Models in Teaching for Conceptual Change

    John J. Clement

  • Active-Learning Methods to Improve Student Performance and Scientific Interest in a Large Introductory Oceanography Course

    Richard F. Yuretich;Samia A. Khan;R. Mark Leckie;John J. Clement

  • Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students

    John J. Clement

Frequent Co-Authors

Elliot Soloway
Elliot Soloway University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities provide flexible, affordable options for those seeking to advance their studies or switch careers. For students considering social work, there are numerous cheapest online msw programs that help reduce the financial burden while maintaining quality education.

Those interested in specialized fields such as behavior analysis can pursue accredited online bcba programs. These are ideal for individuals who wish to work with people with behavioral challenges or autism.

Time-pressed professionals or students can explore accelerated msw programs online, which offer condensed schedules so you can earn your degree faster. Psychology remains a popular discipline, and a fast track psychology degree online is a convenient route for gaining credentials and opening doors to career opportunities in counseling, research, and human resources.

These online programs allow students to gain specialized skills needed for diverse roles in education, healthcare, community work, and beyond—all while balancing studies with work and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing John J. Clement

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles