What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Mathematics education
- Pedagogy
- Artificial intelligence
His primary areas of study are Mathematics education, Science education, Teaching method, Pedagogy and Argument.
His studies in Mathematics education integrate themes in fields like Class and Perception.
His Science education research includes themes of Naïve realism, Social constructionism, Argumentation theory and Sociology of scientific knowledge.
His research in Teaching method intersects with topics in Concept learning and Curriculum development, Curriculum.
His Pedagogy research includes elements of Variety and Framing.
His work deals with themes such as Science teaching, Conceptualization and Formative assessment, which intersect with Argument.
His most cited work include:
- Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics (415 citations)
- Student resources for learning introductory physics (381 citations)
- Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics (310 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Mathematics education, Science education, Pedagogy, Teaching method and Science instruction are his primary areas of study.
His study explores the link between Mathematics education and topics such as Curriculum that cross with problems in Class.
David Hammer has included themes like Knowledge level, Instructional design and Argumentation theory in his Science education study.
He has researched Pedagogy in several fields, including Variety and Framing.
His research integrates issues of Worksheet and Gesture in his study of Framing.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Cognitive development and Curriculum development.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mathematics education (58.23%)
- Science education (30.38%)
- Pedagogy (24.05%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2020)?
- Mathematics education (58.23%)
- Science education (30.38%)
- Science instruction (13.92%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Mathematics education, Science education, Science instruction, Professional development and Ecology.
Mathematics education and Agency are commonly linked in his work.
David Hammer combines subjects such as Computer-Assisted Instruction, Knowledge level and Learning sciences with his study of Science education.
His Science instruction study is concerned with the larger field of Teaching method.
Teaching method is the subject of his research, which falls under Pedagogy.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Scientific reasoning, Teaching assistant, Student teaching and Logical reasoning in addition to Professional development.
Between 2016 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Looking for coherence in science curriculum (33 citations)
- Problematizing as a scientific endeavor (18 citations)
- Positioning as not‐understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science (15 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Pedagogy
- Mathematics education
- Artificial intelligence
His scientific interests lie mostly in Curriculum, Comprehension, Engineering ethics, Scientific literacy and Graduate students.
His research integrates issues of Mathematics education and Science curriculum in his study of Curriculum.
His Comprehension research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Knowledge level, Science education, Memorization and Agency.
His Graduate students study combines topics in areas such as Quantum mechanics and Meaning.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
