World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cedric Linder

Cedric Linder

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
4908
World Ranking
7100
National Ranking
99

Cedric Linder publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cedric Linder sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 210 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Cedric Linder D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cedric Linder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cedric Linder is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden, focusing on research within social sciences and psychology, with an emphasis on education and developmental educational psychology. Their scholarly work encompasses various subfields such as literature and literary theory, statistical and nonlinear physics, and communication.

The primary research topics covered in their publications include science education and pedagogy, innovative teaching and learning methods, experimental and theoretical physics studies, educational tools and methods, discourse analysis in language studies, evaluation of teaching practices, and educational environments and student outcomes.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on learning processes and educational challenges in physics, often exploring visual representations and conceptual understanding among students. Notable recent papers include:

  • Developing representational competence: linking real-world motion to physics concepts through graphs, 2020, Learning Research and Practice
  • Qualitatively different ways of unpacking visual representations when teaching intermolecular forces in upper secondary school, 2021, Science Education
  • Learning to use Cartesian coordinate systems to solve physics problems: the case of 'movability', 2020, European Journal of Physics
  • Using social semiotics and variation theory to analyse learning challenges in physics: a methodological case study, 2020, European Journal of Physics
  • Variation theory as a lens for interpreting and guiding physics students' use of digital learning environments, 2020, European Journal of Physics

The frequent publication venues for Cedric Linder reflect a concentration in journals related to physics education and pedagogy, including:

  • European Journal of Physics
  • Learning Research and Practice
  • Science Education
  • Physical Review Physics Education Research
  • African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education

Collaboration is evident in their coauthorship with several researchers, notably Bor Gregorcic, Moa Eriksson, Urban Eriksson, Trevor Volkwyn, and John Airey, indicating a collaborative approach in interdisciplinary research projects and academic publications.

Best Publications

  • A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes

    John Airey;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder

  • Student-Teachers' Conceptions of Science, Teaching and Learning : A Case Study in Preservice Science Education

    Jose M. Aguirre;Sharon M. Haggerty;Cedric J. Linder

  • A challenge to conceptual change

    Cedric J. Linder

  • Language and the experience of learning university physics in Sweden

    John Airey;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder

  • A study of tertiary physics students’ conceptualizations of sound

    Cedric J. Linder;Gaalen L. Erickson

  • Exploring the role of physics representations : an illustrative example from students sharing knowledge about refraction

    Tobias Fredlund;John Airey;John Airey;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder

  • Reflection and phenomenography: towards theoretical and educational development possibilities

    Unknown

  • University physics students’ conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation

    Cedric J. Linder

  • Understanding sound: so what is the problem?

    Cedric J Linder

  • Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy

    Cedric Linder;Leif Östman;Douglas A. Roberts;Per-Olof Wickman

  • Bilingual Scientific Literacy? The Use of English in Swedish University Science Courses

    John Airey;Cedric Linder

  • Unpacking physics representations: Towards an appreciation of disciplinary affordance

    Tobias Fredlund;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder;John Airey;John Airey;Anne Linder

  • Competing Visions of Scientific Literacy: The Influence of a Science Curriculum Policy Image

    Cedric Linder;Leif Östman;Douglas A. Roberts;Per-Olof Wickman

  • Social Semiotics in University Physics Education

    John Airey;Cedric Linder

  • Is teacher‐reflected epistemology a source of conceptual difficulty in physics?

    Cedric J. Linder

  • A new approach to modelling student retention through an application of complexity thinking

    Jonas Forsman;Cedric Linder;Rachel Moll;Duncan Fraser

  • Promoting Scientific Literacy: Science Education Research in Transaction

    Cedric Linder;Leif Östman;Per-Olof Wickman

  • Enhancing the possibilities for learning: variation of disciplinary-relevant aspects in physics representations

    Tobias Fredlund;John Airey;John Airey;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder

  • The Learners' Experience of Variation: Following Students' Threads of Learning Physics in Computer Simulation Sessions

    Åke Ingerman;Åke Ingerman;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder;Delia Marshall

  • Probability as a conceptual hurdle to understanding one-dimensional quantum scattering and tunnelling

    Daniel Domert;Cedric Linder;Cedric Linder;Åke Ingerman

  • Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core elements in their classroom practices

    Ulrika Bossér;Mattias Lundin;Mats Lindahl;Cedric Linder

  • Promoting Scientific Literacy: Science Education. Research in Transaction. : Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium held at Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Cedric Linder;Leif Östman;Per-Olof Wickman

Frequent Co-Authors

Staffan Andersson
Staffan Andersson University of Gothenburg
Dana L. Zeidler
Dana L. Zeidler University of South Florida
Ference Marton
Ference Marton University of Gothenburg
Leif Östman
Leif Östman Uppsala University
Per-Olof Wickman
Per-Olof Wickman Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse career opportunities, especially with the flexibility of online learning. Many students are opting for online masters to quickly advance their qualifications, often completing their program in just one year.

For those looking to graduate sooner, online accelerated programs allow students to earn their bachelor’s degrees in a fraction of the traditional time, helping early entry into the workforce.

Specialized professions, such as social work, are also accessible through affordable MSW programs online. These programs offer a practical pathway for individuals passionate about community support, often combining flexible study with valuable field experience.

Additionally, fields such as behavior analysis provide rewarding roles for graduates with a BCBA degree. Online programs in this area can be both cost-effective and convenient, preparing students for specialized certification and in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Cedric Linder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles