World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
21398
World Ranking
3731
National Ranking
1783

Fouad Abd-El-Khalick publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fouad Abd-El-Khalick sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Fouad Abd-El-Khalick D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fouad Abd-El-Khalick sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Fouad Abd-El-Khalick is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a focus on education and its related subfields including developmental and educational psychology, management, monitoring, policy and law, as well as social psychology.

The scientist's work concentrates on various topics within education and science pedagogy. Key research areas include science education and pedagogy, education and critical thinking development, educational strategies and epistemologies, evaluation of teaching practices, environmental education and sustainability, animal and plant science education, and innovative teaching methods.

Fouad Abd-El-Khalick has participated in several publications, mainly in the "Journal of Research in Science Teaching" and "Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America."

  • The Nature of Scientific Explanation: Examining the perceptions of the nature, quality, and "goodness" of explanation among college students, science teachers, and scientists (2022, Journal of Research in Science Teaching)
  • Development of VAScoR: A rubric to qualify and score responses to the views of nature of science (VNOS) questionnaire (2023, Journal of Research in Science Teaching)
  • Editors' report: Reflections for the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2015-2020) (2020, Journal of Research in Science Teaching)
  • INQUIRY AND TEACHING ABOUT NATURE OF SCIENCE IN COLLEGE GEOSCIENCE COURSES (2022, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America)

Frequent co-authors in their research include Jeanne L. Brunner, Sahar Alameh, David E. Brown, Ryan Summers, and Jeremy J. Belarmino.

Fouad Abd-El-Khalick's contributions to the academic community have been recognized through awards such as being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science

    Norm G. Lederman;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Randy L. Bell;Renée S. Schwartz

  • Improving Science Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature.

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Norman G. Lederman

  • The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Randy L. Bell;Norman G. Lederman

  • Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science.

    Rola Khishfe;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Inquiry in science education: International perspectives

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Saouma Boujaoude;Richard Duschl;Norman G. Lederman

  • The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Norman G. Lederman

  • Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-based Approach on Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science.

    Valarie L. Akerson;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Norman G. Lederman

  • Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science

    Norman Lederman;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Valarie L. Akerson

  • Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study

    Randy L. Bell;Norman G. Lederman;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Mindy Waters;An Phong Le

  • An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Saouma BouJaoude

  • Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses: Abandoning Scientism, But...

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Teaching With and About Nature of Science, and Science Teacher Knowledge Domains

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Turkish grade 10 students' and science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A national study

    Nihal Dogan;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Examining the Sources for Our Understandings about Science: Enduring Conflations and Critical Issues in Research on Nature of Science in Science Education.

    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth‐grade teacher

    Valarie L. Akerson;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

  • Lebanese Secondary School Students' Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes

    Maha Haidar Makki;Fouad Abd-El-Khalick;Saouma Boujaoude

  • Pre‐service teachers’ understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study

    Norman G. Lederman;Reneé S. Schwartz;Fouad Abd‐El‐Khalick;Randy L. Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman G. Lederman
Norman G. Lederman Illinois Institute of Technology
Dana L. Zeidler
Dana L. Zeidler University of South Florida
Mansoor Niaz
Mansoor Niaz Universidad de Oriente
Michael R. Matthews
Michael R. Matthews University of New South Wales
Richard A. Duschl
Richard A. Duschl Pennsylvania State University
Bill Cope
Bill Cope University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mary Kalantzis
Mary Kalantzis University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David F. Treagust
David F. Treagust Curtin University
Avi Hofstein
Avi Hofstein Weizmann Institute of Science
Caroline Haythornthwaite
Caroline Haythornthwaite Syracuse University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse career opportunities. Flexible learning paths make it possible for students—whether recent graduates or working professionals—to balance their studies with other commitments.

Many students are turning to online MSW programs to prepare for roles in social work and community leadership. Those interested in behavioral health or working with individuals with autism can pursue bcba certification programs online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

Time-conscious learners can accelerate their studies through accelerated msw programs or by choosing a accelerated psychology degree. These options enable quicker entry into the job market without compromising the quality of education.

When choosing an online degree, consider factors such as accreditation, affordability, and internship opportunities. Each pathway is designed to empower graduates with the tools needed for meaningful, people-oriented careers in today’s dynamic society.

Best Scientists Citing Fouad Abd-El-Khalick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles