World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
9570
World Ranking
4352
National Ranking
2081

Katherine K. Perkins publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine K. Perkins sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 130 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Katherine K. Perkins D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine K. Perkins sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katherine K. Perkins is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences and environmental science, emphasizing education and health-related studies.

Their recent publications address a variety of topics and appear in diverse academic venues. Notable papers include:

  • Employing technology-enhanced feedback and scaffolding to support the development of deep science understanding using computer simulations, 2024, International Journal of STEM Education
  • THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL LITERACY ON STUDENTS PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY IN PHYSICS SUBJECTS, 2024, EduFisika Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
  • Reply to Commentary on Understanding the Non-Equivalency of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counts versus the Colony Forming Unit, 2025, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • Considerations for the Validation of Non-CFU Based Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counting Technologies, 2025, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • Gender Development in African American Youth, 2025, UNC Libraries

The scholar frequently collaborates with several researchers including Mike Dingle, Patrick M. Hutchins, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Leonora Kaldaras, and Karen D. Wang.

Publications often appear in the following venues:

  • PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • EduFisika Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
  • UNC Libraries

Main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Subfields where they have contributed are:

  • Education
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Media Technology

Their research covers a range of main topics such as:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Experimental Learning in Engineering
  • Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
  • Online Learning Methods and Innovations

Best Publications

  • New Instrument for Measuring Student Beliefs about Physics and Learning Physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey.

    W. K. Adams;K. K. Perkins;N. S. Podolefsky;M. A. Dubson

  • When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment

    N. D. Finkelstein;W. K. Adams;C. J. Keller;P. B. Kohl

  • PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics

    Katherine Perkins;Wendy Adams;Michael Dubson;Noah Finkelstein

  • PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning

    Carl E. Wieman;Wendy K. Adams;Katherine K. Perkins

  • Transforming Physics Education

    Carl Wieman;Katherine Perkins

  • Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations

    Carl E. Wieman;W.K. Adams;P. Loeblein;K.K. Perkins

  • Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics

    S. B. McKagan;K. K. Perkins;M. A. Dubson;C. V. Malley

  • A Study of Educational Simulations Part 1 - Engagement and Learning

    Wendy K. Adams;Sam Reid;Ron LeMaster;Sarah B. McKagan

  • Correlating Student Beliefs With Student Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey

    K. K. Perkins;W. K. Adams;S. J. Pollock;N. D. Finkelstein

  • Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progressxs

    Carl Wieman;Katherine Perkins;Sarah Gilbert

  • Modifying and Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Use in Chemistry

    Wendy K. Adams;Carl E. Wieman;Katherine K. Perkins;Jack Barbera

  • Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations

    Noah S. Podolefsky;Katherine K. Perkins;Wendy K. Adams

  • PhET Interactive Simulations: Transformative Tools for Teaching Chemistry

    Emily B. Moore;Julia M. Chamberlain;Robert Parson;Katherine K. Perkins

  • Oersted Medal Lecture 2007: Interactive simulations for teaching physics: What works, what doesn’t, and why

    Carl E. Wieman;Katherine K. Perkins;Wendy K. Adams

  • A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design

    Wendy K. Adams;Sam Reid;Ron LeMaster;Sarah McKagan

  • Observations on student difficulties with mathematics in upper-division electricity and magnetism

    Rachel E. Pepper;Stephanie V. Chasteen;Steven J. Pollock;Katherine K. Perkins

  • Design and Validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey.

    S. B. McKagan;K. K. Perkins;C. E. Wieman;C. E. Wieman

  • A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect

    S. B. McKagan;W. Handley;K. K. Perkins;C. E. Wieman

  • The Surprising Impact of Seat Location on Student Performance

    Katherine K. Perkins;Carl E. Wieman

  • Students know what physicists believe, but they don’t agree: A study using the CLASS survey

    Kara E. Gray;Wendy K. Adams;Carl E. Wieman;Katherine K. Perkins

  • A powerful tool for teaching science

    Carl E. Wieman;Katherine K. Perkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl E. Wieman
Carl E. Wieman Stanford University
Noah D. Finkelstein
Noah D. Finkelstein University of Colorado Boulder
Ross J. Salawitch
Ross J. Salawitch University of Maryland, College Park
Ronald C. Cohen
Ronald C. Cohen University of California, Berkeley
Thomas F. Hanisco
Thomas F. Hanisco Goddard Space Flight Center
Ru-Shan Gao
Ru-Shan Gao National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James G. Anderson
James G. Anderson Harvard University
Paul O. Wennberg
Paul O. Wennberg California Institute of Technology
C. T. McElroy
C. T. McElroy York University
David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities, a variety of flexible online programs are available to launch or advance your career. Many students pursue cacrep accredited online counseling programs, which are essential for those looking to become licensed counselors and work in clinical settings. These programs focus on developing practical skills and meeting accreditation standards required for professional practice.

Aspiring mental health professionals often explore the cheapest online mft programs for a cost-effective route into marriage and family therapy. For those interested in understanding human behavior and psychology, an psychology degree online can open doors to various fields, from education to business and healthcare.

Additionally, those seeking to make a difference through social work may opt for 1 year msw programs online no bsw, which offer accelerated pathways without requiring a Bachelor of Social Work. Online degrees provide the flexibility to study while balancing work or family commitments, but it’s crucial to choose accredited, reputable programs for the best career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine K. Perkins

Trending Scientists