World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
C. T. McElroy

C. T. McElroy

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
10052
World Ranking
6630
National Ranking
294

C. T. McElroy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. T. McElroy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

C. T. McElroy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. T. McElroy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

C. T. McElroy is affiliated with York University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Spectroscopy.

Their work covers several main topics including atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, spectroscopy and laser applications, and fire effects on ecosystems.

Frequent co-authors with whom McElroy has collaborated include Kaley A. Walker, Jiansheng Zou, Patrick E. Sheese, C. D. Boone, and D. A. Degenstein.

McElroy's publications have appeared in scientific venues such as Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, and Atmospheric Environment X.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by McElroy include:

  • Assessment of the quality of ACE-FTS stratospheric ozone data (2022), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Estimating wildfire-generated ozone over North America using ozonesonde profiles and a differential back trajectory technique (2020), Atmospheric Environment X
  • Water vapour and ozone in the upper troposphere-lower stratosphere: global climatologies from three Canadian limb-viewing instruments (2022), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • A physically based correction for stray light in Brewer spectrophotometer data analysis (2023), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Total ozone variability and trends over the South Pole during the wintertime (2023), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

McElroy was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2009, under the Academy of Science category.

Best Publications

  • Evidence for Large Upward Trends of Ultraviolet-B Radiation Linked to Ozone Depletion

    J. B. Kerr;C. T. McElroy

  • Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE): Mission overview.

    P. F. Bernath;C.T. Mcelroy;M. C. Abrams;C.D. Boone

  • Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011

    Gloria L. Manney;Gloria L. Manney;Michelle L. Santee;Markus Rex;Nathaniel J. Livesey

  • Tropospheric emissions: Monitoring of pollution (TEMPO)

    P. Zoogman;X. Liu;R.M. Suleiman;W.F. Pennington

  • Hydrogen Radicals, Nitrogen Radicals, and the Production of O3 in the Upper Troposphere

    P. O. Wennberg;T. F. Hanisco;L. Jaeglé;D. J. Jacob

  • New Era of Air Quality Monitoring from Space: Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS)

    Jhoon Kim;Ukkyo Jeong;Myoung Hwan Ahn;Jae H. Kim

  • Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations in the Atmosphere

    A. W. Brewer;C. T. Mcelroy;J. B. Kerr

  • Observed OH and HO2 in the upper troposphere suggest a major source from convective injection of peroxides

    L. Jaeglé;Daniel James Jacob;P. O. Wennberg;C. M. Spivakovsky

  • The Automated Brewer Spectrophotometer

    J. B. Kerr;C. T. McElroy;D. I. Wardle;R. A. Olafson

  • Evidence for bromine monoxide in the free troposphere during the Arctic polar sunrise

    C. T. McElroy;C. T. McElroy;C. A. McLinden;J. C. McConnell

  • Performance of the ground-based total ozone network assessed using satellite data

    V. E. Fioletov;G. Labow;R. Evans;E. W. Hare

  • Solar occultation satellite data and derived meteorological products: Sampling issues and comparisons with Aura Microwave Limb Sounder

    Gloria L. Manney;Gloria L. Manney;William H. Daffer;Joseph M. Zawodny;Peter F. Bernath;Peter F. Bernath

  • Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of 14 limb and occultation ozone profile data records

    Daan Hubert;Jean Christopher Lambert;Tijl Verhoelst;José Granville

  • Solar UVB measurements with the double‐ and single‐monochromator Brewer ozone spectrophotometers

    A. F. Bais;C. S. Zerefos;C. T. McElroy

  • Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

    E. Dupuy;K.A. Walker;K.A. Walker;J. Kar;C.D. Boone

  • The Brewer reference triad

    V. E. Fioletov;J. B. Kerr;C. T. McElroy;D. I. Wardle

  • Altitude distributions of stratospheric constituents from ground‐based measurements at twilight

    R. L. McKenzie;P. V. Johnston;C. T. McElroy;J. B. Kerr

  • Slant column measurements of O3 and NO2 during the NDSC intercomparison of zenith-sky UV-visible spectrometers in June 1996

    H. K. Roscoe;P. V. Johnston;M. Van Roozendael;A. Richter

  • A vector radiative-transfer model for the Odin/OSIRIS project

    C A McLinden;J C McConnell;E Griffioen;C T McElroy

  • The 1991 WMO International ozonesonde intercomparison at Vanscoy, Canada

    J.B. Kerr;H. Fast;C.T. McElroy;S.J. Oltmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter F. Bernath
Peter F. Bernath Old Dominion University
Chris A. McLinden
Chris A. McLinden Environment and Climate Change Canada
Kaley A. Walker
Kaley A. Walker University of Toronto
James R. Drummond
James R. Drummond Dalhousie University
James B. Kerr
James B. Kerr Environment and Climate Change Canada
C. D. Boone
C. D. Boone University of Waterloo
Florence Goutail
Florence Goutail Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Christopher E. Sioris
Christopher E. Sioris Environment and Climate Change Canada
David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gloria L. Manney
Gloria L. Manney Northwest Research Associates

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and deepen understanding of social and educational factors affecting the environment. A sociology bachelor degree online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal trends, which are crucial for crafting effective environmental policies.

Advanced educational roles, particularly in environmental education or policy advocacy, often benefit from higher degrees. Programs like online ed d programs without dissertation offer flexible pathways for professionals seeking leadership roles without the demand of a dissertation.

Accreditation is key when selecting a program. Options such as accredited eds to edd programs ensure that students receive credible qualifications recognized by employers and academic institutions alike.

For those interested in social work within environmental contexts, pursuing the cheapest dsw program online can be a practical way to advance expertise in community-focused environmental initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing C. T. McElroy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles