World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4634
World Ranking
11157
National Ranking
5833

Paul Atchley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Atchley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul Atchley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Atchley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Atchley is a researcher affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their scholarly focus spans the field of Psychology with contributions across multiple specialized subfields.

The main fields of study for their research encompass:

  • Psychology

The research subfields that Atchley contributes to include:

  • Health Informatics
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Social Psychology

Atchley's work addresses several core topics, such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Their recent publications include:

  • "Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: opportunities and concerns" (2024), published in Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "Cooperation in nature: a nature-based intervention improves collaboration and creativity" (2025), published in Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Frequent co-authors working alongside Atchley are:

  • Ruth Ann Atchley
  • Michael M. Hopkins
  • Sean P. Lane
  • Kacie Mennie
  • David L. Strayer

The venues where Atchley commonly publishes include:

  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Best Publications

  • Creativity in the Wild: Improving Creative Reasoning through Immersion in Natural Settings

    Ruth Ann Atchley;David L. Strayer;Paul Atchley

  • On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention

    Jan Theeuwes;Paul Atchley;Arthur F. Kramer

  • The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: Behavior may shape attitude

    Paul Atchley;Stephanie Atwood;Aaron Jacob Boulton

  • The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving.

    Erik Nelson;Paul Atchley;Todd D. Little

  • The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection

    Heather L. Pringle;David E. Irwin;Arthur F. Kramer;Paul Atchley

  • Conversation limits the functional field of view.

    Paul Atchley;Jeff Dressel

  • The effect of age, retinal eccentricity, and speed on the detection of optic flow components.

    Paul Atchley;George J. Andersen

  • Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation

    Paul Atchley;Mark Sai Leong Chan

  • The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults.

    Lesa Hoffman;Joan M. McDowd;Paul Atchley;Richard Dubinsky

  • Aberrant driving behaviors: a study of drivers in Beijing.

    Jianyong Shi;Yong Bai;Xiwen Ying;Paul Atchley

  • Visual marking of old objects

    Jan Theeuwes;Arthur F. Kramer;Paul Atchley

  • Stuck in the 70s: the role of social norms in distracted driving.

    Paul Atchley;Chelsie Hadlock;Sean Lane

  • Cultural foundations of safety culture: A comparison of traffic safety culture in China, Japan and the United States

    Paul Atchley;Jing Shi;Toshiyuki Yamamoto

  • Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus

    Paul Atchley;Arthur F. Kramer;George J. Andersen;Jan Theeuwes

  • Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events.

    George J. Andersen;John Cisneros;Paul Atchley;Asad Saidpour

  • Attentional Control Within 3-D Space

    Jan Theeuwes;Paul Atchley;Arthur F. Kramer

  • Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: attentional set for perceptual transients.

    Paul Atchley;Arthur F. Kramer;Anne P. Hillstrom

  • The need of young adults to text now: Using delay discounting to assess informational choice

    Paul Atchley;Amelia C. Warden

  • Age-related differences in the detection of three-dimensional surfaces from optic flow.

    George J. Andersen;Paul Atchley

  • Attentional effects on preattentive vision: Spatial precues affect the detection of simple features

    Jan Theeuwes;Jan Theeuwes;Arthur F. Kramer;Paul Atchley

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David L. Strayer
David L. Strayer University of Utah
Lesa Hoffman
Lesa Hoffman University of Iowa
Brent A. Kaplan
Brent A. Kaplan Advocates for Human Potential (United States)
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
David E. Irwin
David E. Irwin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Omri Gillath
Omri Gillath University of Kansas
Alan Brown
Alan Brown Harvard University
Todd D. Little
Todd D. Little Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in psychology opens doors to numerous online degree options and professional pathways in the mental health field. Many students consider distance learning to complete essential requirements, especially for careers like counseling or therapy. Each state has distinct regulations and steps for budding professionals seeking licensure.

For example, you can learn how to become a licensed therapist in Huntsville, which emphasizes state-specific education and supervised clinical experience. The process can differ significantly across regions—check out licensed therapist requirements in Indianapolis or see the steps for Irvine licensed therapist education requirements to understand other local variations.

Online psychology programs make it easier to meet these prerequisites while balancing work and life commitments. Students should review state licensing criteria closely, such as the process for how to become a licensed therapist in Irving. Whether aiming for counseling, clinical practice, or research positions, carefully selecting an accredited online degree can support both educational and career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Atchley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles