World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
4944
World Ranking
9256
National Ranking
4902

J. Farley Norman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Farley Norman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Farley Norman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Farley Norman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Farley Norman is affiliated with Western Kentucky University in the United States and specializes in research primarily within the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their published work spans across Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, with additional contributions in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Automotive Engineering.

The scientist's research predominantly focuses on visual perception and processing mechanisms, color perception and design, color science and applications, multisensory perception and integration, spatial cognition and navigation, urban green space and health, and aesthetic perception and analysis.

Frequent coauthors include Jessica M. Dukes, Hannah Shapiro, James T. Todd, Karli N. Sanders, and Alejandro B. Ramirez.

J. Farley Norman has published in several academic journals, with notable venues being:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Vision
  • Vision Research
  • PLoS ONE
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Some of their recent papers are listed below:

  • The Visual Perception of Large-Scale Distances Outdoors (2020, Perception)
  • Aging and the visual perception of object size (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • Aging and the perception of global structure (2020, PLoS ONE)

Other titles in the field of visual perception include:

  • Contours produced by internal specular interreflections provide visual information for the perception of glass materials (2020, Journal of Vision)
  • Visual distance perception indoors, outdoors, and in the dark (2022, Vision Research)

The body of work by J. Farley Norman engages mainly with understanding how humans perceive spatial information and object characteristics, often considering factors such as environmental context and aging. Their contributions extend across both theoretical and experimental approaches within visual and cognitive neuroscience frameworks.

Best Publications

  • The Visual Perception of Three-Dimensional Length

    J. Farley Norman;James T. Todd;Victor J. Perotti;James S. Tittle

  • Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis.

    James S. Tittle;James T. Todd;Victor J. Perotti;J. Farley Norman

  • The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: are observers capable of perceiving metric structure?

    James T. Todd;J. Farley Norman

  • The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape

    J. Farley Norman;Hideko F. Norman;Anna Marie Clayton;Joann Lianekhammy

  • Perception of Three-Dimensional Shape From Specular Highlights, Deformations of Shading, and Other Types of Visual Information

    J. Farley Norman;James T. Todd;Guy A. Orban

  • The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences

    James T. Todd;James T. Todd;J. Farley Norman

  • Parietal regions processing visual 3D shape extracted from disparity.

    Jean-Baptiste Durand;Ronald R. Peeters;J. Farley Norman;James T. Todd

  • The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information

    J. Farley Norman;James T. Todd;Flip Phillips

  • Attention to 3-D Shape, 3-D Motion, and Texture in 3-D Structure from Motion Displays

    Hendrik Peuskens;Kristl G. Claeys;James T. Todd;J. Farley Norman

  • The perception of globally coherent motion.

    Ennio Mingolla;James T. Todd;J. Farley Norman

  • Aging and the perception of speed.

    J Farley Norman;Heather E Ross;Laura M Hawkes;Jennifer R Long

  • Aging and the perception of biological motion.

    J. Farley Norman;Sharon M. Payton;Jennifer R. Long;Laura M. Hawkes

  • The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations

    J. Farley Norman;James T. Todd

  • Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination

    J. Farley Norman;Ashley N. Bartholomew

  • Lightness Constancy in the Presence of Specular Highlights

    James T. Todd;J. Farley Norman;Ennio Mingolla

  • Effects of Texture, Illumination, and Surface Reflectance on Stereoscopic Shape Perception:

    James T Todd;J Farley Norman;Jan J Koenderink;Astrid M L Kappers

  • Information concentration along the boundary contours of naturally shaped solid objects.

    J Farley Norman;Flip Phillips;Heather E Ross

  • The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion.

    J. Farley Norman;Joseph S. Lappin

  • The Effects of Age upon the Perception of Depth and 3-D Shape from Differential Motion and Binocular Disparity

    J Farley Norman;Thomas E Dawson;Amy K Butler

  • Aging and the Visual, Haptic, and Cross-Modal Perception of Natural Object Shape:

    J Farley Norman;Charles E Crabtree;Hideko F Norman;Brandon K Moncrief

  • The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape

    Hideko F Norman;J. Farley Norman;Anna M Clayton;Joann Lianekhammy

Frequent Co-Authors

James T. Todd
James T. Todd The Ohio State University
Astrid M. L. Kappers
Astrid M. L. Kappers Eindhoven University of Technology
Joseph S. Lappin
Joseph S. Lappin Vanderbilt University
Jan J. Koenderink
Jan J. Koenderink Delft University of Technology
Guy A. Orban
Guy A. Orban University of Parma
Ennio Mingolla
Ennio Mingolla Northeastern University
Geoffrey P. Bingham
Geoffrey P. Bingham Indiana University
Frans A. J. Verstraten
Frans A. J. Verstraten University of Sydney
Raymond van Ee
Raymond van Ee Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of career pathways and specialized online degrees. One increasingly popular area is behavior analysis, where earning a certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) can offer rewarding roles in education, healthcare, and therapy.

The steps to become a BCBA involve meeting specific academic and practicum requirements, which can vary by location. For example, you can review the Chula Vista bcba education requirements for a detailed outline of local criteria. Similarly, information about bcba certification requirements in Cincinnati highlights both educational and supervised experience standards.

It's important to note that different cities and states may have unique steps or prerequisites. Exploring the Cleveland bcba education requirements or the Colorado Springs bcba requirements can help you compare what is needed for your ideal career location.

Researching these local differences ensures you choose the right online degree or certification pathway, tailored to your professional goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing J. Farley Norman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles