World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Kazakhstan
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
49
Citations
12170
World Ranking
4230
National Ranking
2

Ata Akcil publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ata Akcil sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 139 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ata Akcil D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ata Akcil sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Kazakhstan Leader Award

Overview

Ata Akcil is affiliated with Süleyman Demirel University in Turkey. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with notable work in subfields such as Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Environmental Chemistry.

The main topics of Ata Akcil's research include:

  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Bauxite Residue and Utilization
  • Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Advancements in Battery Materials

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ata Akcil are:

  • Sandeep Panda
  • Seydou Dembele
  • Srabani Mishra
  • Ayşenur Tuncuk
  • Ceren Erüst

Publication venues where Ata Akcil has frequently contributed include:

  • Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
  • Minerals Engineering
  • Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
  • Minerals
  • Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra = Complex Use of Mineral Resources

Selected recent publications by Ata Akcil are:

  • COVID-19 disruptions to tech-metals supply are a wake-up call, 2020, Nature
  • Hydrometallurgical recycling strategies for recovery of rare earth elements from consumer electronic scraps: a review, 2021, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology

Other related works involving frequent collaborators, though not authored by Ata Akcil, include:

  • Biotechnological trends and market impact on the recovery of rare earth elements from bauxite residue (red mud) - A review, 2021, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Red mud valorization an industrial waste circular economy challenge; review over processes and their chemistry, 2020, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
  • Technological trends, emerging applications and metallurgical strategies in antimony recovery from stibnite, 2021, Minerals Engineering

Ata Akcil has also contributed to book publications, including a recent work published by Springer International Publishing titled Biotechnological Innovations in the Mineral-Metal Industry (2024).

Best Publications

  • Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies

    Ata Akcil;Soner Koldas

  • Aqueous metal recovery techniques from e-scrap: Hydrometallurgy in recycling

    A. Tuncuk;V. Stazi;A. Akcil;E.Y. Yazici

  • Precious metal recovery from waste printed circuit boards using cyanide and non-cyanide lixiviants: a review

    Ata Akcil;Ceren Erust;Chandra Sekhar Gahan;Chandra Sekhar Gahan;Mehmet Ozgun

  • A review of approaches and techniques used in aquatic contaminated sediments: metal removal and stabilization by chemical and biotechnological processes

    Ata Akcil;Ceren Erust;Sevda Ozdemiroglu;Viviana Fonti

  • Cyanide and removal options from effluents in gold mining and metallurgical processes

    Nural Kuyucak;Ata Akcil

  • Recent advances on hydrometallurgical recovery of critical and precious elements from end of life electronic wastes - a review

    Manivannan Sethurajan;Eric D. van Hullebusch;Danilo Fontana;Ata Akcil

  • Destruction of cyanide in gold mill effluents: biological versus chemical treatments.

    Ata Akcil

  • A review of technologies for the recovery of metals from spent alkaline and zinc-carbon batteries

    Emine Sayilgan;T. Kukrer;Gökhan Civelekoglu;F. Ferella

  • A review of metal recovery from spent petroleum catalysts and ash

    Ata Akcil;Francesco Vegliò;Francesco Ferella;Mediha Demet Okudan

  • Biotechnological strategies for the recovery of valuable and critical raw materials from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) - A review.

    Arda Işıldar;Arda Işıldar;Eric D. van Hullebusch;Eric D. van Hullebusch;Markus Lenz;Markus Lenz;Gijs Du Laing

  • Current scenario of chalcopyrite bioleaching: a review on the recent advances to its heap-leach technology.

    Sandeep Panda;Ata Akcil;Nilotpala Pradhan;Haci Deveci

  • Microbial destruction of cyanide wastes in gold mining: process review.

    Ata Akcil;Terry Mudder

  • Environmentally sustainable acid mine drainage remediation: Research developments with a focus on waste/by-products

    I. Moodley;C.M. Sheridan;U. Kappelmeyer;U. Kappelmeyer;A. Akcil

  • Biological treatment of cyanide by natural isolated bacteria (Pseudomonas sp.)

    A Akcil;AG Karahan;H Ciftci;Osman Sagdic

  • Bioleaching of complex zinc sulphides using mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria: comparative importance of pH and iron

    H. Deveci;A. Akcil;I. Alp

  • Biohydrometallurgy techniques of low grade ores: A review on black shale

    Fozia Anjum;Muhammad Shahid;Ata Akcil

  • Biodegradation of cyanide containing effluents by Scenedesmus obliquus.

    Fatma Gurbuz;Hasan Ciftci;Ata Akcil

  • Overview On Extraction and Separation of Rare Earth Elements from Red Mud: Focus on Scandium

    Ata Akcil;Nazym Akhmadiyeva;Rinat Abdulvaliyev;Abhilash

  • A greener approach for resource recycling: Manganese bioleaching.

    S. Ghosh;S. Mohanty;A. Akcil;L.B. Sukla

  • Role and contribution of pure and mixed cultures of mesophiles in bioleaching of a pyritic chalcopyrite concentrate

    A. Akcil;H. Ciftci;H. Deveci

  • Heterogeneous catalytic degradation of cyanide using copper-impregnated pumice and hydrogen peroxide.

    Mehmet Kitis;Emine Karakaya;Nevzat O. Yigit;Gokhan Civelekoglu

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Vegliò
Francesco Vegliò University of L'Aquila
Mehmet Kitis
Mehmet Kitis Süleyman Demirel University
Francesca Beolchini
Francesca Beolchini Marche Polytechnic University
Eric D. van Hullebusch
Eric D. van Hullebusch Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Antonio Dell'Anno
Antonio Dell'Anno Marche Polytechnic University
Zhi Sun
Zhi Sun Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jae-chun Lee
Jae-chun Lee Korea University of Science and Technology
Osman Sagdic
Osman Sagdic Yıldız Technical University
Gijs Du Laing
Gijs Du Laing Ghent University
Muhammad Shahid
Muhammad Shahid COMSATS University Islamabad

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology can open doors to many diverse, interdisciplinary careers. Alongside traditional engineering roles, students often benefit by developing skills in areas like business, law, finance, and administration. Hybrid education pathways are increasingly popular, making it easier to complement technical knowledge with practical skills via online programs.

For those interested in leadership or entrepreneurship, pursuing an MBA in 6 months is a fast, flexible way to gain essential business acumen without lengthy commitment. If you’re considering a law-related career such as intellectual property or compliance, accelerated paralegal programs offer swift, accredited routes to in-demand roles.

Want to strengthen your foundation in financial management? The best online bookkeeping certificate programs enable engineers and tech professionals to understand budgets, analysis, and project funding. Additionally, office administration degrees are valuable for careers that blend tech skills with organizational leadership—crucial for effective workplace management.

Pairing your engineering degree with one or more of these online programs can make your skill set more versatile and open broader career pathways in the tech-driven job market.

Best Scientists Citing Ata Akcil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles