World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Zacharias C. Zacharia

Zacharias C. Zacharia

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
8628
World Ranking
6611
National Ranking
4

Zacharias C. Zacharia publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zacharias C. Zacharia sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 96 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Zacharias C. Zacharia D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zacharias C. Zacharia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle

    Margus Pedaste;Mario Mäeots;Leo A. Siiman;Ton de Jong

  • Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education

    Ton de Jong;Marcia C. Linn;Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits

    Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning.

    Zacharias C. Zacharia;Georgios Olympiou

  • Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics

    Zacharias Zacharia

  • Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding through Science Laboratory Experimentation

    Georgios Olympiou;Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature

    Zacharias C. Zacharia;Georgios Olympiou;Marios Papaevripidou

  • Modeling-Based Learning in Science Education: Cognitive, Metacognitive, Social, Material and Epistemological Contributions.

    Loucas T. Louca;Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students’ conceptual understanding of physics

    Unknown

  • Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students

    Tasos Hovardas;Olia E. Tsivitanidou;Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • Urban Middle-School Students' Attitudes Toward a Defined Science

    Zacharias Zacharia;Angela Calabrese Barton

  • Identifying Potential Types of Guidance for Supporting Student Inquiry When Using Virtual and Remote Labs in Science: A Literature Review

    Zacharias C. Zacharia;Constantinos Manoli;Nikoletta Xenofontos;Ton de Jong

  • The Impact of Interactive Computer Simulations on the Nature and Quality of Postgraduate Science Teachers’ Explanations in Physics

    Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • Learning by creating and exchanging objects: The SCY experience

    Ton de Jong;Wouter R. van Joolingen;Adam Giemza;Isabelle Girault

  • The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum

    Zacharias C. Zacharia;Ton de Jong

  • Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction

    Unknown

  • Investigating Secondary School Students' Unmediated Peer Assessment Skills.

    Olia E. Tsivitanidou;Zacharias C. Zacharia;Tasos Hovardas

  • Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature

    Zacharias C. Zacharia;Constantinos P. Constantinou

  • In Quest of Productive Modeling-Based Learning Discourse in Elementary School Science

    Loucas T. Louca;Zacharias C. Zacharia;Constantinos P. Constantinou

  • Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students

    Zacharias C. Zacharia;Eleni Loizou;Marios Papaevripidou

Frequent Co-Authors

Ton de Jong
Ton de Jong University of Twente
Margus Pedaste
Margus Pedaste University of Tartu
Armin Weinberger
Armin Weinberger Saarland University
Angela Calabrese Barton
Angela Calabrese Barton Michigan State University
Marcia C. Linn
Marcia C. Linn University of California, Berkeley
Denis Gillet
Denis Gillet École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Zacharias C. Zacharia

Recently Published Articles