World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert A. C. Ruiter

Robert A. C. Ruiter

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3097 2853 158 151 352 16702

Robert A. C. Ruiter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert A. C. Ruiter between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert A. C. Ruiter published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2014. 41 of the 435 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 24 publications
1998 2025

435 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert A. C. Ruiter: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 5
2004 5
2005 11
2006 12
2007 8
2008 14
2009 12
2010 19
2011 14
2012 29
2013 32
2014 35
2015 24
2016 25
2017 15
2018 15
2019 25
2020 23
2021 23
2022 22
2023 19
2024 17
2025 24
Total 435
Download as CSV

Robert A. C. Ruiter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. C. Ruiter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 352 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 352
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert A. C. Ruiter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. C. Ruiter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert A. C. Ruiter is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and conducts research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences. Their work encompasses several subfields including General Health Professions, Health, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, and Infectious Diseases. The research focus spans topics such as Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Global Maternal and Child Health, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, and Traffic and Road Safety.

Their recent publications demonstrate engagement with diverse topics and include the following studies:

  • "Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Risk factors of loneliness across the life span," 2021, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • "Core Processes: How to Use Evidence, Theories, and Research in Planning Behavior Change Interventions," 2020, Frontiers in Public Health
  • "Contextual correlates of loneliness in adolescents," 2021, Children and Youth Services Review
  • "Two dimensions of problematic smartphone use mediate the relationship between fear of missing out and emotional well-being," 2020, Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Research collaboration is a significant aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Gill A. ten Hoor
  • Karlijn Massar
  • Gerjo Kok
  • Rik Crutzen
  • Philippe Verduyn

Their contributions often appear in journals with repeated publications, including:

  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • BMC Public Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach.

    Gerjo Kok;Nell H Gottlieb;Gjalt-Jorn Y Peters;Patricia Dolan Mullen

  • Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals.

    Robert A.C. Ruiter;Charles Abraham;Gerjo Kok

  • Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies.

    Maria E. Fernandez;Gill A. ten Hoor;Sanne van Lieshout;Serena A. Rodriguez

  • Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory

    Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters;Robert A.C. Ruiter;Gerjo Kok

  • Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence

    Robert A. C. Ruiter;Loes T. E. Kessels;Gjalt-Jorn Y. Peters;Gjalt-Jorn Y. Peters;Gerjo Kok

  • Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes

    Gerjo Kok;Herman Schaalma;Robert A. C. Ruiter;Pepijn Van Empelen

  • Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples

    Maria E. Fernandez;Robert A.C. Ruiter;Christine Margaret Markham;Gerjo Kok

  • Why don't young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors.

    K.P.H. Lemmens;C. Abraham;T. Hoekstra;R.A.C. Ruiter

  • Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groups

    Irene A Harmsen;Liesbeth Mollema;Robert A C Ruiter;Theo G W Paulussen

  • Healthy and unhealthy social norms and food selection. Findings from a field-experiment.

    Saar Mollen;Rajiv N. Rimal;Robert A.C. Ruiter;Gerjo Kok

  • Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: an overview and implications for future research

    J.P. van 't Riet;R.A.C. Ruiter

  • A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientation and trust

    Paul A. M. Van Lange;Mark Van Vugt;Ree M. Meertens;Rob A. C. Ruiter

  • Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: a qualitative study.

    Cephas Sialubanje;Cephas Sialubanje;Karlijn Massar;Davidson H Hamer;Robert A C Ruiter

  • Ignoring theory and misinterpreting evidence: The false belief in fear appeals.

    Gerjo Kok;Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters;Loes T E Kessels;Gill A Ten Hoor

  • Disease detection or public opinion reflection? content analysis of tweets, other social media, and online newspapers during the measles outbreak in the Netherlands in 2013

    Liesbeth Mollema;Irene A Harmsen;Emma Broekhuizen;Rutger Clijnk

  • Planning theory- and evidence-based behavior change interventions: a conceptual review of the intervention mapping protocol

    Gerjo Kok;Louk W. H. Peters;Robert A. C. Ruiter

  • Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information.

    Loes T. E. Kessels;Robert A. C. Ruiter;Bernadette M. Jansma

  • Improving access to skilled facility-based delivery services: women's beliefs on facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia

    Cephas Sialubanje;Cephas Sialubanje;Karlijn Massar;Marit S. G. van der Pijl;Elisa Maria Kirch

  • Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education

    K. P. H. Lemmens;C. Abraham;R. A. C. Ruiter;I. J. T. Veldhuizen

  • Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals: The role of need for cognition

    Robert A. C. Ruiter;Bas Verplanken;David De Cremer;Gerjo Kok

  • Saying is not (always) doing: cigarette warning labels are useless

    Robert A. C. Ruiter;Gerjo Kok

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerjo Kok
Gerjo Kok Maastricht University
Bart van den Borne
Bart van den Borne Maastricht University
Priscilla Reddy
Priscilla Reddy Human Sciences Research Council
Herman P. Schaalma
Herman P. Schaalma Maastricht University
Tom Brijs
Tom Brijs Hasselt University
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University
Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University
Karl Peltzer
Karl Peltzer Asian University
Stef P. J. Kremers
Stef P. J. Kremers Maastricht University
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a variety of in-demand career paths. Marriage and family therapy (MFT) is one popular specialization, and each state or city often has its own licensure requirements. For example, if you’re considering pursuing Detroit mft certification requirements, you’ll need to complete a regionally accredited program, gain supervised clinical experience, and pass a national exam.

Similarly, those interested in building a career in Durham can review the mft requirements in Durham, which emphasize state-approved graduate coursework and hands-on practicums. In Texas, the process varies slightly, so be sure to check out how to become an mft in El Paso for local guidelines, including fingerprinting and jurisprudence exams.

Indiana residents can explore the Fort Wayne mft education requirements to map out their study plans. These varying pathways highlight the importance of researching local regulations while considering online degrees, ensuring your education aligns with your chosen career destination.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. C. Ruiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles