World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
48768
World Ranking
5312
National Ranking
524

Paul G. Ince publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Ince sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 385 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul G. Ince D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Ince sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul G. Ince is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a strong focus on the subfields of Neurology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Clinical Psychology.

Their scientific work covers several main topics including Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

Paul G. Ince has contributed to multiple publications found in several key venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Brain Pathology
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul G. Ince include:

  • Heterogeneity in Regional Damage Detected by Neuroimaging and Neuropathological Studies in Older Adults With COVID-19: A Cognitive-Neuroscience Systematic Review to Inform the Long-Term Impact of the Virus on Neurocognitive Trajectories, 2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated transcriptome alterations in cortical neurones and associated neurovascular unit cells in the ageing brain, 2021, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Insights into the pathological basis of dementia from population-based neuropathology studies, 2023, Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
  • Heterogeneity of cellular inflammatory responses in ageing white matter and relationship to Alzheimer's and small vessel disease pathologies, 2020, Brain Pathology
  • Assessment of Alzheimer-related pathologies of dementia using machine learning feature selection, 2023, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

Throughout their career, Paul G. Ince has frequently collaborated with other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Carol Brayne
  • Stephen B. Wharton
  • Fiona E. Matthews
  • Julie E. Simpson
  • Paul R. Heath

Best Publications

  • Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) Report of the consortium on DLB international workshop

    I. G. Mckeith;D. Galasko;K. Kosaka;E. K. Perry

  • Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Nigel J. Cairns;Eileen H. Bigio;Ian R A Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann

  • Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with SOD1 mutations

    Ian R.A. Mackenzie;Eileen H. Bigio;Paul G. Ince;Felix Geser

  • Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Nigel J. Cairns

  • Pathological correlates of late-onset dementia in a multicentre, community-based population in England and Wales

    M M Esiri;F Matthews;C Brayne;P G Ince

  • Age, neuropathology, and dementia.

    George M Savva;Stephen B Wharton;Paul G Ince;Gillian Forster

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): Revised diagnostic criteria

    Michael J. Strong;Sharon Abrahams;Laura H. Goldstein;Susan Woolley

  • White Matter Lesions in an Unselected Cohort of the Elderly: Molecular Pathology Suggests Origin From Chronic Hypoperfusion Injury

    Malee S. Fernando;Julie E. Simpson;Fiona Matthews;Carol Brayne

  • Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of frontotemporal cognitive and behavioural syndromes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Michael J. Strong;Gloria M. Grace;Morris Freedman;Cathy Lomen-Hoerth

  • Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions

    Vivianna M. Van Deerlin;Patrick M A Sleiman;Maria Martinez-Lage;Maria Martinez-Lage;Alice Chen-Plotkin

  • Controversies and priorities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Martin R Turner;Orla Hardiman;Michael Benatar;Benjamin R Brooks

  • Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): Report of the Consortium on DLB International Workshop

    Ian G. McKeith

  • Mutation in the gene encoding ferritin light polypeptide causes dominant adult-onset basal ganglia disease.

    Andrew R.J. Curtis;Constanze Fey;Christopher M Morris;Laurence A. Bindoff

  • Prospective validation of consensus criteria for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies.

    I.G. McKeith;C.G. Ballard;R.H. Perry;P.G. Ince

  • White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and normal aging

    R. Barber;P. Scheltens;A. Gholkar;C. Ballard

  • Staging of Neurofibrillary Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease: A Study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium

    Irina Alafuzoff;Thomas Arzberger;Safa Al-Sarraj;Istvan Bodi

  • ALS phenotypes with mutations in CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B)

    N. Parkinson;P. G. Ince;M. O. Smith;R. Highley

  • Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration : consensus recommendations

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Nigel J. Cairns

  • Psychiatric morbidity in dementia with Lewy bodies: a prospective clinical and neuropathological comparative study with Alzheimer's disease.

    Clive Ballard;Clive Holmes;Ian McKeith;David Neill

  • Education, the brain and dementia: neuroprotection or compensation?

    Carol Brayne;Paul G. Ince;Hannah A. D. Keage;Ian G. McKeith

Frequent Co-Authors

Pamela J. Shaw
Pamela J. Shaw University of Sheffield
Carol Brayne
Carol Brayne University of Cambridge
Fiona E. Matthews
Fiona E. Matthews Newcastle University
Irina Alafuzoff
Irina Alafuzoff Uppsala University
Robert H. Perry
Robert H. Perry Newcastle University
Ian G. McKeith
Ian G. McKeith Newcastle University
John T. O'Brien
John T. O'Brien University of Cambridge
Glenda M. Halliday
Glenda M. Halliday University of Sydney
Gabor G. Kovacs
Gabor G. Kovacs University of Toronto
Manuela Neumann
Manuela Neumann University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA but want to explore additional healthcare careers, many flexible online degree options are available. For students interested in patient care roles, exploring easiest nursing programs to get into can provide accessible entry points into nursing with less competitive admissions.

Alternatively, those seeking non-clinical roles can enroll in medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, offering rapid paths to in-demand administrative careers. Students aiming to advance their nursing credentials may consider lpn to rn programs without teas test, which waive common entrance exams for qualified applicants.

For those looking to move into healthcare leadership, pursuing an accelerated healthcare administration degree online can speed up your journey to management positions. With growing demand for skilled professionals, these online programs offer accessible and practical routes to build a rewarding career in healthcare beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Paul G. Ince

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles