World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
43098
World Ranking
8194
National Ranking
470

Manuela Neumann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela Neumann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 222 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Manuela Neumann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela Neumann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manuela Neumann is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with considerable contributions to Neurology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Physiology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The core topics addressed in their work include:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neumann has published extensively in venues such as Acta Neuropathologica, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Journal of Neurology, and The Lancet Neurology. Among these, Acta Neuropathologica stands out as a frequent publication venue.

Their notable recent papers include:

  • "Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study", 2021, Acta Neuropathologica
  • "LATE-NC staging in routine neuropathologic diagnosis: an update", 2022, Acta Neuropathologica
  • "Plasma extracellular vesicle tau and TDP-43 as diagnostic biomarkers in FTD and ALS", 2024, Nature Medicine
  • "Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration TDP-43-Immunoreactive Pathological Subtypes: Clinical and Mechanistic Significance", 2021, Advances in experimental medicine and biology
  • "Neurofilaments in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: blood biomarkers at the preataxic and ataxic stage in humans and mice", 2020, EMBO Molecular Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include Ian R. Mackenzie, Glenda M. Halliday, Edward B. Lee, Lea T. Grinberg, and Günter U. Höglinger, reflecting multidisciplinary teams often involved in neurodegenerative disease studies.

Best Publications

  • Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Manuela Neumann;Deepak M. Sampathu;Linda K. Kwong;Adam C. Truax

  • Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Nigel J. Cairns;Eileen H. Bigio;Ian R A Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann

  • Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with SOD1 mutations

    Ian R.A. Mackenzie;Eileen H. Bigio;Paul G. Ince;Felix Geser

  • Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Nigel J. Cairns

  • A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann;Atik Baborie;Deepak M. Sampathu

  • TDP-43 and FUS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

    Ian R.A. Mackenzie;Rosa Rademakers;Manuela Neumann

  • ALS-associated fused in sarcoma (FUS) mutations disrupt Transportin-mediated nuclear import

    Dorothee Dormann;Dorothee Dormann;Ramona Rodde;Ramona Rodde;Dieter Edbauer;Eva Bentmann;Eva Bentmann

  • TARDBP mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with TDP-43 neuropathology: a genetic and histopathological analysis

    Vivianna M. Van Deerlin;James B. Leverenz;James B. Leverenz;Lynn M. Bekris;Thomas D. Bird;Thomas D. Bird

  • A new subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with FUS pathology.

    Manuela Neumann;Rosa Rademakers;Sigrun Roeber;Matt Baker

  • Subcellular Localization of Wild-Type and Parkinson's Disease-Associated Mutant α-Synuclein in Human and Transgenic Mouse Brain

    Philipp J. Kahle;Manuela Neumann;Laurence Ozmen;Veronika Müller

  • Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions

    Vivianna M. Van Deerlin;Patrick M A Sleiman;Maria Martinez-Lage;Maria Martinez-Lage;Alice Chen-Plotkin

  • Phosphorylation of S409/410 of TDP-43 is a consistent feature in all sporadic and familial forms of TDP-43 proteinopathies

    Manuela Neumann;Manuela Neumann;Linda K. Kwong;Edward B. Lee;Elisabeth Kremmer

  • TDP-43 in familial and sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin inclusions.

    Nigel J. Cairns;Manuela Neumann;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Ida E. Holm

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients.

    Julene K. Johnson;Janine Diehl;Mario F. Mendez;John Neuhaus

  • Neuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia

    Keith A. Josephs;John R. Hodges;Julie S. Snowden;Ian R. Mackenzie

  • Concomitant TAR-DNA-binding protein 43 pathology is present in Alzheimer disease and corticobasal degeneration but not in other tauopathies.

    Kunihiro Uryu;Hanae Nakashima-Yasuda;Mark S. Forman;Linda K. Kwong

  • Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration : consensus recommendations

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Nigel J. Cairns

  • Advances in understanding the molecular basis of frontotemporal dementia

    Rosa Rademakers;Manuela Neumann;Ian R. A. Mackenzie

  • Enrichment of C-Terminal Fragments in TAR DNA-Binding Protein-43 Cytoplasmic Inclusions in Brain but not in Spinal Cord of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    Lionel M. Igaz;Linda K. Kwong;Yan Xu;Adam C. Truax

  • A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology Ian R. A. MackenzieManuela NeumannAtik BaborieDeepak M. Sampathu • Daniel Du PlessisEvelyn JarosRobert H. PerryJohn Q. Trojanowski • David M. A. MannVirginia M. Y. Lee

    I. R. A. Mackenzie;M. Neumann;A. Baborie;D. Du Plessis

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian R. Mackenzie
Ian R. Mackenzie University of British Columbia
Hans A. Kretzschmar
Hans A. Kretzschmar Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Virginia M.-Y. Lee
Virginia M.-Y. Lee University of Pennsylvania
Christian Haass
Christian Haass Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Philipp J. Kahle
Philipp J. Kahle University of Tübingen
Glenda M. Halliday
Glenda M. Halliday University of Sydney
Rosa Rademakers
Rosa Rademakers University of Antwerp
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Dieter Edbauer
Dieter Edbauer German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA also opens the door to diverse online degrees and career options within the healthcare field. For registered nurses who wish to advance their clinical practice without starting from scratch, rn to fnp programs offer an accelerated route to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Those interested in the intersection of health and diet can pursue nutrition degrees online, preparing for roles in community health, wellness coaching, or clinical nutrition.

If you are more drawn to healthcare leadership or hospital operations, accredited distance-learning options like cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs are an excellent alternative. These are designed for future managers, executives, and policy makers in healthcare.

Additionally, many professionals seek to advance with programs tailored to working nurses, such as rn to bsn programs without clinicals, making it possible to earn a bachelor’s degree flexibly and quickly.

These career pathways all complement traditional medical education and can help shape a dynamic role within the U.S. health system.

Best Scientists Citing Manuela Neumann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles