World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
40129
World Ranking
19525
National Ranking
9720

Eugene J. Mark publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene J. Mark sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 553 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eugene J. Mark D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene J. Mark sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eugene J. Mark is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Social Sciences. Their work includes significant contributions to subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

The scientist's recent publications demonstrate a strong emphasis on Asian studies, particularly within the contexts of historical and political analysis. Their academic output includes two notable papers: one titled "Malaysia's National Role Conceptions and Transitions of Foreign Policy From Tunku to Mahathir" published in 2023 in Kajian Malaysia, and another titled "One Year on, the Centrality of Politics in Malaysia's COVID-19 Crisis" published in 2021 in Southeast Asian affairs. These papers address areas such as political transitions and the role of politics in managing health crises.

Core topics of Eugene J. Mark's research include:

  • Asian Studies and History
  • Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
  • Global Trade and Economics
  • COVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Throughout their career, they have collaborated with various coauthors, including Johan Saravanamuttu, Nawaljeet Singh Rayar, Jose Ricardo Sto. Domingo, and Nawaljeet Singh. These collaborations suggest interdisciplinary research efforts within the social science domain.

The scientist's work has appeared primarily in the following publication venues:

  • Kajian Malaysia
  • Southeast Asian affairs

Across their topics and subfields, Eugene J. Mark has engaged with complex political and socioeconomic issues, often relating to Southeast Asia. Their research explores themes of national policy evolution, election politics, economic trends, and public health crises, combining approaches from sociology, political science, and economics.

Best Publications

  • Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital.

    R. E. Scully;E. J. Mark;W. F. Mcneely;B. U. Mcneely

  • Genotypic and Histological Evolution of Lung Cancers Acquiring Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors

    Lecia V. Sequist;Belinda A. Waltman;Dora Dias-Santagata;Subba Digumarthy

  • Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses

    Arindam Bhattacharjee;William G. Richards;Jane Staunton;Cheng Li

  • Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Harbor EML4-ALK

    Alice T. Shaw;Beow Y. Yeap;Mari Mino-Kenudson;Subba R. Digumarthy

  • ROS1 Rearrangements Define a Unique Molecular Class of Lung Cancers

    Kristin Bergethon;Alice T. Shaw;Sai Hong Ignatius Ou;Ryohei Katayama

  • Weekly clinicopathological exercises

    Robert E. Scully;Eugene J. Mark;William F. Mcneely;Jo-Anne O. Shepard

  • Lymphatic metastasis in the absence of functional intratumor lymphatics.

    Timothy P. Padera;Ananth Kadambi;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Carla Mouta Carreira

  • Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura: Eight new cases and review of 360 cases in the literature

    Michael Briselli;Eugene J. Mark;G. Richard Dickersin

  • Unique clinicopathologic features characterize ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the western population.

    Scott J. Rodig;Mari Mino-Kenudson;Sanja Dacic;Beow Y. Yeap

  • Interleukin-6 Overexpression Induces Pulmonary Hypertension

    M. Kathryn Steiner;Olga L. Syrkina;Narasaish Kolliputi;Eugene J. Mark

  • Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells

    Eric J. Duell;John K. Wiencke;Tsun-Jen Cheng;Andrea Varkonyi

  • A novel, highly sensitive antibody allows for the routine detection of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas by standard immunohistochemistry.

    Mari Mino-Kenudson;Lucian R. Chirieac;Kenny Law;Jason L. Hornick

  • Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung: progression from organizing pneumonia to fibrous histiocytoma or to plasma cell granuloma in 32 cases.

    Osamu Matsubara;Nelia S. Tan-Liu;Robert M. Kenney;Eugene J. Mark

  • p16INK4a and Histology-specific Methylation of CpG Islands by Exposure to Tobacco Smoke in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Duk Hwan Kim;Heather H. Nelson;John K. Wiencke;Shichun Zheng

  • Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease

    Jess Mandel;Eugene J. Mark;Charles A. Hales

  • Early Age at Smoking Initiation and Tobacco Carcinogen DNA Damage in the Lung

    John K. Wiencke;Sally W. Thurston;Karl T. Kelsey;Andrea Varkonyi

  • Implications and prognostic value of K-ras mutation for early-stage lung cancer in women.

    Heather H. Nelson;David C. Christiani;Eugene J. Mark;John K. Wiencke

  • Mucinous Differentiation Correlates with Absence of EGFR Mutation and Presence of KRAS Mutation in Lung Adenocarcinomas with Bronchioloalveolar Features

    Karin E. Finberg;Lecia V. Sequist;Victoria A. Joshi;Alona Muzikansky

  • Cerebral vasoconstriction and stroke after use of serotonergic drugs.

    A. B. Singhal;V. S. Caviness;A. F. Begleiter;E. J. Mark

  • Benign lymphoid disorders of the lung, with a theory regarding their development.

    Richard L. Kradin;Eugene J. Mark

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Scully
Robert E. Scully Harvard University
Mari Mino-Kenudson
Mari Mino-Kenudson Harvard University
John C. Wain
John C. Wain Harvard University
David C. Christiani
David C. Christiani Harvard University
Karl T. Kelsey
Karl T. Kelsey Brown University
A. John Iafrate
A. John Iafrate Harvard University
Douglas J. Mathisen
Douglas J. Mathisen Harvard University
John K. Wiencke
John K. Wiencke University of California, San Francisco
Brett E. Bouma
Brett E. Bouma Harvard University
Andrew E. Rosenberg
Andrew E. Rosenberg University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A medical career in the USA offers a variety of flexible online pathways for those who want to enter or advance in the healthcare field. Prospective students are often concerned about the costs associated with online programs. Understanding how much is online nursing school can help you plan ahead and compare options that fit your budget.

For registered nurses aiming for professional growth, there are several most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs available, offering a convenient way to earn a bachelor’s degree. Nurses seeking advanced roles can explore online nursing doctorate programs, which open doors to leadership, research, and educational opportunities.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors provide a fast-track route into advanced nursing positions. All of these online degree options offer flexibility, but it’s vital to choose accredited programs to ensure high educational standards and eligibility for licensure. Whether you’re entering the field or advancing your career, online healthcare education makes it possible to balance studies with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene J. Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles