World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
85
Citations
77749
World Ranking
1311
National Ranking
143

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
81
Citations
75353
World Ranking
480
National Ranking
32

Mark W. Woolrich publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Woolrich sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 245 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark W. Woolrich D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Woolrich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Woolrich is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience with an extensive publication record that spans various subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's main research topics include functional brain connectivity studies, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, advanced MRI techniques and applications, neurological disorders and treatments, and neuroscience and neuropharmacology research.

Notable recent papers demonstrate the breadth of their work and include:

  • Optimising network modelling methods for fMRI, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Challenges and future directions for representations of functional brain organization, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Replay bursts in humans coincide with activation of the default mode and parietal alpha networks, 2020, Neuron
  • EMD: Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert-Huang Spectral Analyses in Python, 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software
  • Behavioural relevance of spontaneous, transient brain network interactions in fMRI, 2021, NeuroImage

Frequently collaborating researchers include:

  • Andrew J. Quinn
  • Diego Vidaurre
  • Chetan Gohil
  • Anna C. Nobre
  • Mats W.J. van Es

Mark W. Woolrich's work appears regularly in several scientific venues with multiple publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • NeuroImage
  • Imaging Neuroscience
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

The comprehensive scope of their research covers both theoretical and applied aspects of brain function and connectivity, utilizing advanced imaging modalities and computational techniques. This multidisciplinary approach integrates neuroscience with imaging sciences and computational methods, contributing to a deeper understanding of brain organization and dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

    S M Smith;M Jenkinson;M W Woolrich;M W Woolrich;C F Beckmann

  • New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies

    Alexandre Routier;Arnaud Marcoux;Mauricio Diaz Melo;Jérémy Guillon

  • Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain?

    Behrens Tej.;H J Berg;S Jbabdi;Rushworth Mfs.

  • Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

    Timothy E.J. Behrens;M. W. Woolrich;Mi Jenkinson;H. Johansen-Berg

  • Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data.

    Mark W. Woolrich;Brian D. Ripley;J. Michael Brady;Stephen M. Smith

  • Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL.

    Mark William Woolrich;Saâd Jbabdi;Brian Patenaude;Michael A. Chappell

  • Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging

    T E J Behrens;H Johansen-Berg;M W Woolrich;M W Woolrich;S M Smith

  • Learning the value of information in an uncertain world

    Timothy E J Behrens;Mark W Woolrich;Mark E Walton;Matthew F S Rushworth;Matthew F S Rushworth

  • Network modelling methods for FMRI.

    Stephen M. Smith;Karla L. Miller;Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi;Matthew Webster

  • Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference.

    Mark W. Woolrich;Mark W. Woolrich;Timothy Edward John Behrens;Timothy Edward John Behrens;Christian F. Beckmann;Christian F. Beckmann;Mark Jenkinson

  • Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project

    S M Smith;C F Beckmann;J Andersson;E J Auerbach

  • Associative learning of social value

    Timothy E. J. Behrens;Laurence T. Hunt;Laurence T. Hunt;Mark W. Woolrich;Matthew F. S. Rushworth;Matthew F. S. Rushworth

  • Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI

    S.M. Smith;D. Vidaurre;Christian Beckmann;Christian Beckmann;Christian Beckmann;M.F. Glasser

  • Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography

    Matthew J. Brookes;Mark Woolrich;Henry Luckhoo;Darren Price

  • Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity

    Jill X. O’Reilly;Mark W. Woolrich;Timothy E.J. Behrens;Stephen M. Smith

  • Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time

    Diego Vidaurre;Stephen M. Smith;Mark W. Woolrich

  • Temporally-independent functional modes of spontaneous brain activity

    Stephen M. Smith;Karla L. Miller;Steen Moeller;Junqian Xu

  • How Green Is the Grass on the Other Side? Frontopolar Cortex and the Evidence in Favor of Alternative Courses of Action

    Erie D. Boorman;Timothy E.J. Behrens;Mark W. Woolrich;Matthew F.S. Rushworth

  • Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity

    Adam P. Baker;Matthew J. Brookes;Iead A. Rezek;Stephen M. Smith

  • Robust group analysis using outlier inference.

    Mark William Woolrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith University of Oxford
Timothy E.J. Behrens
Timothy E.J. Behrens University of Oxford
Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Christian F. Beckmann
Christian F. Beckmann Radboud University
Matthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes University of Nottingham
Morten L. Kringelbach
Morten L. Kringelbach University of Oxford
Thomas E. Nichols
Thomas E. Nichols University of Oxford
Gustavo Deco
Gustavo Deco Pompeu Fabra University
Mark Jenkinson
Mark Jenkinson University of Oxford
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible online study options. Many students and professionals seek to enhance their skill sets and credentials through online degree and certificate programs that align with their career ambitions.

Business-minded individuals may consider an accelerated MBA to quickly gain leadership and management expertise. For those interested in legal foundations or seeking a complementary qualification, paralegal certificate programs offer focused training and can open doors within law offices and corporate environments.

Technical professionals can also benefit from bookkeeping certification online, which builds essential financial skills valuable across industries, including engineering firms. Additionally, an associate in office administration provides a versatile foundation for supporting project management and administrative operations within technical organizations.

These online pathways help students and professionals in Engineering and Technology broaden their career prospects while enjoying the flexibility and convenience of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Woolrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles