World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leonard Petrucelli

Leonard Petrucelli

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
39800
World Ranking
6042
National Ranking
3231

Neuroscience

D-Index
108
Citations
39765
World Ranking
592
National Ranking
334

Leonard Petrucelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard Petrucelli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 278 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Leonard Petrucelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard Petrucelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonard Petrucelli is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research spans primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these areas, their work focuses on subfields such as Neurology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Physiology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist has contributed to several main research topics, including:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Petrucelli has been a frequent contributor to multiple scientific journals. The venues with the highest number of their publications include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • Science Translational Medicine
  • Neurology

Some of their recent papers are as follows:

  • "TDP-43 represses cryptic exon inclusion in the FTD-ALS gene UNC13A," 2022, Nature
  • "Posttranslational Modifications Mediate the Structural Diversity of Tauopathy Strains," 2020, Cell
  • "Truncated stathmin-2 is a marker of TDP-43 pathology in frontotemporal dementia," 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "Reduced C9ORF72 function exacerbates gain of toxicity from ALS/FTD-causing repeat expansion in C9orf72," 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Cellular and pathological heterogeneity of primary tauopathies," 2021, Molecular Neurodegeneration

The researcher frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Dennis W. Dickson
  • Mercedes Prudencio
  • Tania F. Gendron
  • Bradley F. Boeve
  • Karen Jansen-West

Best Publications

  • Unconventional Translation of C9ORF72 GGGGCC Expansion Generates Insoluble Polypeptides Specific to c9FTD/ALS

    Peter E.A. Ash;Kevin F. Bieniek;Tania F. Gendron;Thomas Caulfield

  • GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport

    Brian D. Freibaum;Yubing Lu;Rodrigo Lopez-Gonzalez;Nam Chul Kim

  • CHIP and Hsp70 regulate tau ubiquitination, degradation and aggregation

    Leonard Petrucelli;Dennis Dickson;Kathryn Kehoe;Julie Taylor

  • The high-affinity HSP90-CHIP complex recognizes and selectively degrades phosphorylated tau client proteins

    Chad A. Dickey;Chad A. Dickey;Adeela Kamal;Karen Lundgren;Natalia Klosak

  • Targeting RNA Foci in iPSC-Derived Motor Neurons from ALS Patients with a C9ORF72 Repeat Expansion

    Dhruv Sareen;Jacqueline G. O’Rourke;Pratap Meera;A. K. M. G. Muhammad

  • Structural determinants of the cellular localization and shuttling of TDP-43

    Youhna M. Ayala;Paola Zago;Andrea D'Ambrogio;Ya Fei Xu

  • Parkin protects against the toxicity associated with mutant alpha-synuclein: proteasome dysfunction selectively affects catecholaminergic neurons.

    Leonard Petrucelli;Casey O'Farrell;Paul J. Lockhart;Melisa Baptista

  • Tar DNA Binding Protein-43 (TDP-43) Associates with Stress Granules: Analysis of Cultured Cells and Pathological Brain Tissue

    Liqun Liu-Yesucevitz;Aylin Bilgutay;Yong Jie Zhang;Tara Vanderwyde

  • Aberrant Cleavage of TDP-43 Enhances Aggregation and Cellular Toxicity

    Yong Jie Zhang;Ya Fei Xu;Casey Cook;Tania F. Gendron

  • The A53T α-Synuclein Mutation Increases Iron-Dependent Aggregation and Toxicity

    Natalie Ostrerova-Golts;Leonard Petrucelli;John Hardy;John M. Lee

  • Wild-Type Human TDP-43 Expression Causes TDP-43 Phosphorylation, Mitochondrial Aggregation, Motor Deficits, and Early Mortality in Transgenic Mice

    Ya Fei Xu;Tania F. Gendron;Yong Jie Zhang;Wen Lang Lin

  • ER–mitochondria associations are regulated by the VAPB–PTPIP51 interaction and are disrupted by ALS/FTD-associated TDP-43

    Radu Stoica;Kurt J. De Vos;Kurt J. De Vos;Sébastien Paillusson;Sarah Mueller

  • Antisense transcripts of the expanded C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat form nuclear RNA foci and undergo repeat-associated non-ATG translation in c9FTD/ALS

    Tania F Gendron;Kevin F. Bieniek;Yong-Jie Zhang;Karen Jansen-West

  • Lewy bodies and parkinsonism in families with parkin mutations.

    M Farrer;P Chan;R Chen;L Tan

  • The role of tau in neurodegeneration

    Tania F Gendron;Leonard Petrucelli

  • TDP-43 pathology disrupts nuclear pore complexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport in ALS/FTD

    Ching Chieh Chou;Yi Zhang;Yi Zhang;Mfon E. Umoh;Spencer W. Vaughan

  • Gain of Toxicity from ALS/FTD-Linked Repeat Expansions in C9ORF72 Is Alleviated by Antisense Oligonucleotides Targeting GGGGCC-Containing RNAs

    Jie Jiang;Jie Jiang;Qiang Zhu;Tania F. Gendron;Shahram Saberi

  • Novel mutations in TARDBP (TDP-43) in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    Nicola J. Rutherford;Yong-Jie Zhang;Matt Baker;Jennifer M Gass

  • Converging pathways in neurodegeneration, from genetics to mechanisms.

    Li Gan;Li Gan;Mark R. Cookson;Leonard Petrucelli;Albert R. La Spada

  • An autoradiographic evaluation of AV-1451 Tau PET in dementia.

    Val J. Lowe;Geoffry Curran;Ping Fang;Amanda M. Liesinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Tania F. Gendron
Tania F. Gendron Mayo Clinic
Rosa Rademakers
Rosa Rademakers University of Antwerp
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Keith A. Josephs
Keith A. Josephs Mayo Clinic
Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Joseph E. Parisi
Joseph E. Parisi Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience can open doors to diverse fields, and online education offers flexible ways to get started. For those interested in clinical practice or research, online psyd programs apa accredited provide rigorous training in psychology and neuropsychology, making them a solid choice for aspiring professionals.

If you’re interested in the counseling side of neuroscience, consider online mft programs focusing on marriage and family therapy. These specialized degrees help blend neuroscientific principles with practical therapeutic skills.

For students eager to join the workforce sooner, accelerated degree programs online can fast-track your bachelor's studies. These programs are designed to be completed quickly—without sacrificing quality—helping you launch your neuroscience or related career faster.

As you plan your education pathway, explore the top 10 best bachelor degrees for earning potential and job stability. Many neuroscience-related fields offer rewarding and lucrative opportunities, especially with the right degree and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard Petrucelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles