World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2787 2552 1606 1437 254 21914

Seth M. Noar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Seth M. Noar between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Seth M. Noar published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2025. 96 of the 376 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2025. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 81 publications
2001 2025

376 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Seth M. Noar: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 5
2005 2
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 16
2010 9
2011 12
2012 12
2013 12
2014 15
2015 12
2016 23
2017 17
2018 31
2019 19
2020 17
2021 26
2022 12
2023 10
2024 15
2025 81
Total 376
Download as CSV

Seth M. Noar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth M. Noar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 254
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Seth M. Noar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth M. Noar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Seth M. Noar is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their scholarly work centers primarily on topics related to smoking behavior, cessation, and public health communication within the behavioral health domain.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • (Mis)communicating about COVID-19: Insights from Health and Crisis Communication, 2020, Health Communication
  • Evaluating the actual and perceived effectiveness of E-cigarette prevention advertisements among adolescents, 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Some Risk Appraisals But Not Risk Beliefs: A Meta-Analysis, 2020, Human Communication Research

Seth M. Noar's research contributions often intersect with several key themes, encompassing:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Their work frequently appears in such venues as Health Communication, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Tobacco Control, and the Journal of Health Communication. In addition, a significant volume of their output is housed within UNC Libraries.

Their academic interests span several subfields including:

  • Applied Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions

Seth M. Noar collaborates regularly with other researchers, including:

  • Noel T. Brewer
  • Marissa G. Hall
  • Kurt M. Ribisl
  • Erin L. Sutfin
  • Allison J. Lazard

Their body of work addresses health communication strategies, public health messaging, and behavioral intervention techniques, contributing to an understanding of how media and messaging influence health behaviors, particularly in tobacco use prevention and cessation.

Best Publications

  • Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

    Seth M. Noar;Christina Nicole Benac;Melissa Sue Harris

  • A 10-Year Retrospective of Research in Health Mass Media Campaigns: Where Do We Go From Here?

    Seth M. Noar

  • Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction?

    Seth M. Noar;Rick S. Zimmerman

  • Efficacy of text messaging-based interventions for health promotion: a meta-analysis.

    Katharine J. Head;Seth M. Noar;Nicholas T. Iannarino;Nancy Grant Harrington

  • A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions

    Mia Liza A. Lustria;Seth M. Noar;Juliann Cortese;Stephanie K. Van Stee

  • Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the web: Review and analysis of key components

    Mia Liza A. Lustria;Juliann Cortese;Seth M. Noar;Robert L. Glueckauf

  • Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies

    Seth M Noar;Marissa G Hall;Diane B Francis;Kurt M Ribisl

  • The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development

    Seth M. Noar

  • Illicit Use of Prescription ADHD Medications on a College Campus: A Multimethodological Approach

    Alan D DeSantis;Elizabeth M Webb;Seth M Noar

  • Parent-Adolescent Sexual Communication and Adolescent Safer Sex Behavior A Meta-Analysis

    Laura Widman;Sophia Choukas-Bradley;Seth M. Noar;Jacqueline Nesi

  • Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: a meta-analysis.

    Seth M Noar;Hulda G Black;Larson B Pierce

  • Why Communication Is Crucial: Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Safer Sexual Communication and Condom Use

    Seth M Noar;Kellie Carlyle;Christi Cole

  • A 10-Year Systematic Review of HIV/AIDS Mass Communication Campaigns: Have We Made Progress?

    Seth M Noar;Philip Palmgreen;Melissa Chabot;Nicole Dobransky

  • The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

    Seth M. Noar;Diane B. Francis;Christy Bridges;Jennah M. Sontag

  • Behavioral Interventions to Reduce HIV-related Sexual Risk Behavior: Review and Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Evidence

    Seth M. Noar

  • The effectiveness of group-based comprehensive risk-reduction and abstinence education interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted infections: two systematic reviews for the Guide to Community Preventive Services.

    Helen B. Chin;Theresa Ann Sipe;Randy Elder;Shawna L. Mercer

  • Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Noel T. Brewer;Marissa G. Hall;Seth M. Noar;Humberto Parada

  • Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: considerations and approaches.

    Seth M. Noar;Melissa Chabot;Rick S. Zimmerman

  • The Role of Message Tailoring in the Development of Persuasive Health Communication Messages

    Seth M. Noar;Nancy Grant Harrington;Rosalie Shemanski Aldrich

  • Physician weight loss advice and patient weight loss behavior change: a literature review and meta-analysis of survey data

    S A Rose;P S Poynter;J W Anderson;S M Noar

Frequent Co-Authors

Noel T. Brewer
Noel T. Brewer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kurt M. Ribisl
Kurt M. Ribisl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Rick S. Zimmerman
Rick S. Zimmerman Wayne State University
Philip Palmgreen
Philip Palmgreen University of Kentucky
Adam O. Goldstein
Adam O. Goldstein University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Laura Widman
Laura Widman North Carolina State University
Richard A. Crosby
Richard A. Crosby University of Kentucky
Paschal Sheeran
Paschal Sheeran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark Dredze
Mark Dredze Johns Hopkins University
Brian G. Southwell
Brian G. Southwell Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to many related fields, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. These pathways are increasingly accessible through distance learning, allowing greater flexibility for students balancing work or personal commitments.

Affordability is a critical factor when considering your educational options. Several programs across the United States offer budget-friendly alternatives, making a career in counseling more attainable. For example, you can find affordable counseling degrees in Los Angeles or pursue one of the affordable counseling degrees in Michigan. Similarly, there are multiple affordable counseling degrees in Minnesota and options for the cheapest counseling degrees in Nashville.

Graduates with a psychology or counseling degree can pursue roles in schools, healthcare centers, private practice, or community organizations. Online programs are a practical starting point for those considering a transition or advancement in the behavioral health field, supporting both education and future career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Seth M. Noar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles