World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
33
Citations
3568
World Ranking
946
National Ranking
24

Patrick Emmenegger publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Emmenegger sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 247 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Patrick Emmenegger D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Emmenegger sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Emmenegger is affiliated with the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with a concentrated focus on Political Science and International Relations as well as Economics and Econometrics. They have published extensively, with over 90 works in political science and international relations and nearly 50 publications related to economics and econometrics.

Their work addresses topics including electoral systems and political participation, social policy and reform studies, political influence and corporate strategies, game theory and voting systems, fiscal policy and economic growth, local government finance and decentralization, and corporate taxation and avoidance. These subjects reveal a broad interest in the intersection of political structures, economic policies, and governance.

Patrick Emmenegger has authored several recent papers:

  • Agency in historical institutionalism: Coalitional work in the creation, maintenance, and change of institutions (2021, Theory and Society)
  • Social partner involvement in collective skill formation governance. A comparison of Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland (2020, Transfer European Review of Labour and Research)

In addition to their individual work, they frequently collaborate with other researchers. Significant co-authors include André Walter, Lucas Leemann, Martin B. Carstensen, Scherwin M. Bajka, and Alexandra Strebel.

Patrick Emmenegger's research has appeared in a variety of publication venues. Among these, the most frequent are:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Swiss Political Science Review
  • Regulation & Governance
  • Journal of European Public Policy
  • European Political Science Review

Their interdisciplinary approach covers a combination of social science disciplines with an emphasis on political and economic analysis. This is reflected in their engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of governance, coordination, and institutional development across different national contexts.

Best Publications

  • The age of dualization : the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies

    Patrick Emmenegger;Silja Häusermann;Bruno Palier;Martin Seeleib-Kaiser

  • Barriers to Entry : Insider/Outsider Politics and the Political Determinants of Job Security Regulations

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • How we Grow Unequal

    Patrick Emmenegger;Silja Häusermann;Bruno Palier;Martin Seeleib-Kaiser

  • Making Democratic Citizens: The Effects of Migration Experience on Political Attitudes in Central and Eastern Europe

    Romana Careja;Patrick Emmenegger

  • Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: The making of a classic

    Patrick Emmenegger;Jon Kvist;Paul Marx;Klaus Petersen

  • The Power to Dismiss: Trade Unions and the Regulation of Job Security in Western Europe

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • The Power to Dismiss

    Unknown

  • Job security regulations in Western democracies: A fuzzy set analysis

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • Labour Market Disadvantage, Political Orientations and Voting: How Adverse Labour Market Experiences Translate into Electoral Behaviour

    Patrick Emmenegger;Paul Marx;Dominik Schraff

  • QCA, the Truth Table Analysis and Large-N Survey Data : The Benefits of Calibration and the Importance of Robustness Tests

    Patrick Emmenegger;Dominik Schraff;André Walter

  • Defending the organisation, not the members: Unions and the reform of job security legislation in Western Europe

    Johan Bo Davidsson;Patrick Emmenegger

  • The Age of Dualization

    Patrick Emmenegger;Silja Häusermann;Bruno Palier;Martin Seeleib-Kaiser

  • Religion and the Gender Vote Gap Women’s Changed Political Preferences from the 1970s to 2010

    Patrick Emmenegger;Philip Manow

  • The Long Road to Flexicurity: The Development of Job Security Regulations in Denmark and Sweden

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • Specificity versus replaceability: the relationship between skills and preferences for job security regulations

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • Agency in historical institutionalism coalitional work in the creation, maintenance, and change of institutions

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • Business and the development of job security regulations: the case of Germany

    Patrick Emmenegger;Paul Marx

  • From dilemma to dualisation: Social and migration policies in the ‘reluctant countries off immigration

    Romana Careja;Patrick Emmenegger

  • The governance of decentralised cooperation in collective training systems: a review and conceptualisation

    Patrick Emmenegger;Lukas Graf;Christine Trampusch

  • Book Review of Alexander A. Caviedes (2010): Prying Open Fortress Europe: The Turn to Sectoral Labour Migration. Lanham: Lexington

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • Strategic Re‐framing as a Vote Winner: Why Vote‐seeking Governments Pursue Unpopular Reforms

    Christian Elmelund-Præstekær;Patrick Emmenegger

  • Off to a bad start: Unemployment and political interest during early adulthood

    Patrick Emmenegger;Paul Marx;Dominik Schraff

  • The Long Arm of Justice: U.S. Structural Power and International Banking

    Patrick Emmenegger

  • Making the Most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: An Assessment of QCA Applications in Comparative Welfare State Research

    Patrick Emmenegger;Jon Kvist;Svend-Erik Skaaning

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Marx
Paul Marx University of Bonn
Silja Häusermann
Silja Häusermann University of Zurich
Bruno Palier
Bruno Palier Sciences Po
Martin Seeleib-Kaiser
Martin Seeleib-Kaiser University of Tübingen
Klaus Armingeon
Klaus Armingeon University of Zurich
Giuliano Bonoli
Giuliano Bonoli University of Lausanne
Philip Manow
Philip Manow University of Siegen
Svend-Erik Skaaning
Svend-Erik Skaaning Aarhus University
Jochen Clasen
Jochen Clasen University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of academic and career pathways. Today’s students have more options than ever, including cheap online degrees fast that allow for flexible and affordable learning. Online programs can reduce costs and help you graduate quickly, which is ideal for those eager to start their careers.

Complementary fields like environmental science also provide diverse opportunities. You might be surprised at the variety of jobs with bachelor's in elementary education and environmental science, which range from policy work to teaching and community engagement.

If you have a strong interest in data and analysis, an online mathematics degree offers skills highly valued in political research, data analytics, and polling. Additionally, graduates might consider library science—one of the fastest-evolving fields in digital information management. Explore the best library science programs to see how information science intersects with political and social studies.

These interdisciplinary and online pathways can help you customize your education and career in the ever-changing world of political science.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Emmenegger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles