World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 62 3239 2983 1836 1652 292 14131

José A. Bauermeister publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by José A. Bauermeister between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. José A. Bauermeister published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 19.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2025. 78 of the 436 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2025. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 48 publications
2004 2025

436 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
José A. Bauermeister: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 7
2008 4
2009 13
2010 8
2011 9
2012 17
2013 17
2014 20
2015 29
2016 23
2017 28
2018 33
2019 23
2020 26
2021 42
2022 30
2023 27
2024 30
2025 48
Total 436
Download as CSV

José A. Bauermeister publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A. Bauermeister sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 292 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 292
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

José A. Bauermeister D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A. Bauermeister sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 62
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

José A. Bauermeister is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Health Professions, with significant contributions in subfields such as Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Social Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their main topics of work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, Sex work and related issues, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology.

Frequent publication venues for Bauermeister include UNC Libraries, AIDS and Behavior, Journal of the International AIDS Society, Journal of Adolescent Health, and BMC Public Health.

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including Lisa Hightow-Weidman, Stephen Bonett, Seul Ki Choi, Willey Lin, and Rob Stephenson.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • LGBTQ + cultural competency training for health professionals: a systematic review (2023, BMC Medical Education)
  • Engagement in mHealth behavioral interventions for HIV prevention and care: making sense of the metrics (2020, mHealth)
  • COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among an Online Sample of Sexual and Gender Minority Men and Transgender Women (2021, Vaccines)
  • Behavioral Efficacy of a Sexual Health Mobile App for Men Who Have Sex With Men: Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobile Messaging for Men (2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • The impact of stigma on HIV testing decisions for gay, bisexual, queer and other men who have sex with men: a qualitative study (2022, BMC Public Health)

Best Publications

  • Detecting, Preventing, and Responding to “Fraudsters” in Internet Research: Ethics and Tradeoffs

    Jennifer E. F. Teitcher;Walter O. Bockting;José A. Bauermeister;Chris J. Hoefer

  • Sexting among young adults.

    Deborah Gordon-Messer;Jose Arturo Bauermeister;Alison Grodzinski;Marc Zimmerman

  • Gay and Bisexual Men's Use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013

    Christian Grov;Aaron S. Breslow;Michael E. Newcomb;Joshua G. Rosenberger

  • A Systematic Review of Recent Smartphone, Internet and Web 2.0 Interventions to Address the HIV Continuum of Care

    Kathryn E. Muessig;Manali Nekkanti;Jose Bauermeister;Sheana Bull

  • PrEP Awareness and Perceived Barriers Among Single Young Men who have Sex with Men

    Jose A. Bauermeister;Steven Meanley;Emily Pingel;Jorge H. Soler

  • Thinking About the Future as a Way to Succeed in the Present: A Longitudinal Study of Future Orientation and Violent Behaviors Among African American Youth

    Sarah A. Stoddard;Marc A. Zimmerman;José A. Bauermeister

  • Minimal Awareness and Stalled Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among at Risk, HIV-Negative, Black Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Lisa A. Eaton;Daniel D. Driffin;Jose Bauermeister;Harlan Smith

  • Validity of the Sluggish Cognitive Tempo, Inattention, and Hyperactivity Symptom Dimensions: Neuropsychological and Psychosocial Correlates

    José J. Bauermeister;Russell A. Barkley;José A. Bauermeister;José V. Martínez

  • Data Quality in web-based HIV/AIDS research: Handling Invalid and Suspicious Data.

    Jose A. Bauermeister;Emily Pingel;Marc Zimmerman;Mick Couper

  • Psychological Distress, Substance Use, and HIV/STI Risk Behaviors Among Youth

    Katherine S. Elkington;José A. Bauermeister;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Religiosity and Marital Stability Among Black American and White American Couples

    Edna Brown;Terri L. Orbuch;Jose A. Bauermeister

  • Innovative recruitment using online networks: lessons learned from an online study of alcohol and other drug use utilizing a web-based, respondent-driven sampling (webRDS) strategy.

    José A. Bauermeister;Marc A. Zimmerman;Michelle M. Johns;Pietreck Glowacki

  • Relationship Trajectories and Psychological Well-Being Among Sexual Minority Youth

    José A. Bauermeister;Michelle Marie Johns;Theo G. M. Sandfort;Anna Eisenberg

  • Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles

    Hailey Winetrobe;Eric Rice;Jose Bauermeister;Robin Petering

  • "Barebacking": Intentional Condomless Anal Sex in HIV-Risk Contexts. Reasons for and Against It

    Alex Carballo-Dieguez;José A. Bauermeister

  • MINORITY STRESS, POSITIVE IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT, AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESILIENCE AMONG SEXUAL MINORITY MALE YOUTH.

    Douglas Bruce;Gary W. Harper;Jose A. Bauermeister

  • Youth, Technology, and HIV: Recent Advances and Future Directions

    Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman;Kathryn E. Muessig;Jose Bauermeister;Chen Zhang

  • The Intersection of Youth, Technology, and New Media with Sexual Health: Moving the Research Agenda Forward

    Susannah Allison;Jose A. Bauermeister;Sheana Bull;Marguerita Lightfoot

  • Do parents and peers matter? A prospective socio-ecological examination of substance use and sexual risk among African American youth

    Katherine S. Elkington;José A. Bauermeister;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Creating comprehensive, youth centered, culturally appropriate sex education: What do young gay, bisexual and questioning men want?

    Emily Sweetnam Pingel;Laura Thomas;Chelsea Harmell;José A. Bauermeister

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc A. Zimmerman
Marc A. Zimmerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gary W. Harper
Gary W. Harper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rob Stephenson
Rob Stephenson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Alex Carballo-Diéguez
Alex Carballo-Diéguez Columbia University
Curtis Dolezal
Curtis Dolezal Columbia University
Cleopatra H. Caldwell
Cleopatra H. Caldwell University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Keith J. Horvath
Keith J. Horvath San Diego State University
Ana Ventuneac
Ana Ventuneac Start Treatment & Recovery Centers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open doors to diverse online degrees and specialized career pathways. One popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role focused on behavioral therapy and analysis.

Each state and city has unique requirements for this certification. For example, Phoenix bcba education requirements emphasize accredited graduate degrees and relevant supervised experience. Meanwhile, those interested in pursuing this pathway in Pennsylvania should review the bcba certification requirements in Pittsburgh to understand licensure and training prerequisites.

Additionally, understanding Plano bcba education requirements can help prospective students plan their academic trajectory according to Texas standards. In Florida, it is important to be aware of the steps for becoming a bcba in Port St. Lucie, including fieldwork and exam processes.

Choosing the right online degree and understanding regional certification processes are critical steps toward a successful psychology career in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing José A. Bauermeister

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles