World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6976
World Ranking
7907
National Ranking
4241

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
7224
World Ranking
7398
National Ranking
3191

Edward M. Bernat publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Bernat sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 116 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Edward M. Bernat D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Bernat sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward M. Bernat is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with subfields including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, physiology, and social psychology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics related to mental health and brain function, such as anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, neural dynamics and brain function, functional brain connectivity studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, smoking behavior and cessation, and suicide and self-harm studies.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Edward M. Bernat are the following:

  • Recommendations and publication guidelines for studies using frequency domain and time-frequency domain analyses of neural time series, 2022, Psychophysiology
  • Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement remediates anhedonia in chronic opioid use by enhancing neurophysiological responses during savoring of natural rewards, 2021, Psychological Medicine
  • A practical introduction to EEG Time-Frequency Principal Components Analysis (TF-PCA), 2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Exploring a sustainable building's impact on occupant mental health and cognitive function in a virtual environment, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Diversity and the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), 2023, Nature Reviews Psychology

Frequent co-authors working alongside Bernat include Spencer T. Fix, Norman B. Schmidt, Devin Butler, Asha Pavuluri, and Kelvin Choi.

The scientist frequently publishes in several venues, among which are bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Psychophysiology, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Tobacco Control, and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Best Publications

  • Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing.

    Edward Bernat;Scott Bunce;Howard Shevrin

  • Externalizing Psychopathology and the Error-Related Negativity

    Jason R. Hall;Edward M. Bernat;Christopher J. Patrick

  • Effects of picture content and intensity on affective physiological response

    Edward Bernat;Christopher J. Patrick;Stephen D. Benning;Auke Tellegen

  • P300 amplitude as an indicator of externalizing in adolescent males

    Christopher J. Patrick;Edward M. Bernat;Stephen M. Malone;William G. Iacono

  • Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task

    Jeremy Harper;Stephen M. Malone;Edward M. Bernat

  • Unconscious perception: a model-based approach to method and evidence.

    Michael Snodgrass;Edward Bernat;Howard Shevrin

  • Genetic and disorder-specific aspects of resting state EEG abnormalities in schizophrenia.

    Noah C. Venables;Edward M. Bernat;Scott R. Sponheim;Scott R. Sponheim

  • Externalizing psychopathology and gain-loss feedback in a simulated gambling task: dissociable components of brain response revealed by time-frequency analysis.

    Edward M. Bernat;Lindsay D. Nelson;Vaughn R. Steele;William J. Gehring

  • Evidence of disrupted functional connectivity in the brain after combat-related blast injury

    Scott R. Sponheim;Scott R. Sponheim;Kathryn A. McGuire;Kathryn A. McGuire;Seung Suk Kang;Seung Suk Kang;Nicholas D. Davenport;Nicholas D. Davenport

  • Decomposing ERP time–frequency energy using PCA

    Edward M. Bernat;William J. Williams;William J. Gehring

  • Genes mediate the association between P3 amplitude and externalizing disorders.

    Brian M. Hicks;Edward Bernat;Steven M. Malone;William G. Iacono

  • Startle reflex potentiation during aversive picture viewing as an indicator of trait fear.

    Uma Vaidyanathan;Christopher J. Patrick;Edward M. Bernat

  • Recursive Tensor Subspace Tracking for Dynamic Brain Network Analysis

    Alp Ozdemir;Edward M. Bernat;Selin Aviyente

  • Anterior cingulate activity to monetary loss and basal ganglia activity to monetary gain uniquely contribute to the feedback negativity.

    Dan Foti;Anna Weinberg;Edward M. Bernat;Greg H. Proudfit

  • Clarifying the Role of Defensive Reactivity Deficits in Psychopathy and Antisocial Personality Using Startle Reflex Methodology

    Uma Vaidyanathan;Jason R. Hall;Christopher J. Patrick;Edward M. Bernat

  • Dynamics of processing invisible faces in the brain: automatic neural encoding of facial expression information.

    Yi Jiang;Robert W. Shannon;Nathalie Vizueta;Edward M. Bernat

  • Decomposing delta, theta, and alpha time-frequency ERP activity from a visual oddball task using PCA.

    Edward M. Bernat;Stephen M. Malone;William J. Williams;Christopher J. Patrick

  • Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task

    Edward M. Bernat;Lindsay D. Nelson;Arielle R. Baskin-Sommers

  • Subliminal visual oddball stimuli evoke a P300 component

    Edward Bernat;Howard Shevrin;Michael Snodgrass

  • Operationalizing proneness to externalizing psychopathology as a multivariate psychophysiological phenotype

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Christopher J. Patrick;Edward M. Bernat

  • Neurobiology of Psychopathy

    Christopher J. Patrick;Edward M. Bernat

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Stephen M. Malone
Stephen M. Malone University of Minnesota
William G. Iacono
William G. Iacono University of Minnesota
Kent A. Kiehl
Kent A. Kiehl University of New Mexico
Norman B. Schmidt
Norman B. Schmidt Florida State University
William J. Gehring
William J. Gehring University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Heather A. Henderson
Heather A. Henderson University of Waterloo
Paul van den Broek
Paul van den Broek Leiden University
Paul F Collins
Paul F Collins University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths, especially when combined with related disciplines such as psychology, social work, and behavioral analysis. Many students choose to build a multidisciplinary foundation with flexible online programs that complement their neuroscience studies.

For those interested in mental health services, an msw (Master of Social Work) is a popular option. Budget-conscious students can also find affordable options, and advanced learners may benefit from an accelerated masters in social work to fast-track their credentials.

Another growing area is behavioral analysis, where specialists work directly with individuals to address behavioral and cognitive challenges. Those seeking credentials in this field can explore bcba programs, which prepare students for Board Certified Behavior Analyst roles.

If you're drawn to understanding behavior from a scientific perspective, an accelerated psychology programs online can complement your neuroscience background and boost job prospects in research, therapy, and applied settings.

Best Scientists Citing Edward M. Bernat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles