World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10016 9397 5155 4761 352 35272

Lisa A. Cooper publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa A. Cooper between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa A. Cooper published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 15.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2021. 38 of the 411 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 15 publications
2000 2025

411 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa A. Cooper: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 3
2002 10
2003 10
2004 15
2005 10
2006 14
2007 9
2008 14
2009 9
2010 9
2011 13
2012 14
2013 23
2014 16
2015 15
2016 14
2017 12
2018 25
2019 23
2020 27
2021 29
2022 29
2023 29
2024 23
2025 15
Total 411
Download as CSV

Lisa A. Cooper publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa A. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 352 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 352
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa A. Cooper D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa A. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2007 - Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Lisa A. Cooper is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their scholarly contributions primarily focus on medicine and health professions, with 111 publications in Medicine and 76 in Health Professions. Within these areas, notable subfields of study include General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research encompasses several main topics, such as Health disparities and outcomes, Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Circulation, where they have published 25 papers. Other significant venues are JAMA Health Forum, American Journal of Hypertension, Journal of General Internal Medicine, and Journal of the American Heart Association.

Some recent papers by Lisa A. Cooper include:

  • The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement, 2022, JAMA
  • COVID-19 and Health Equity-A New Kind of "Herd Immunity", 2020, JAMA
  • Testimonial Injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and Women, 2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Historical Insights on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the 1918 Influenza Pandemic, and Racial Disparities: Illuminating a Path Forward, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • At the Heart of the Matter, 2020, Circulation

Frequent co-authors include Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, LaPrincess C. Brewer, Sharonne N. Hayes, and Christi A. Patten.

Lisa A. Cooper has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by Johns Hopkins University Press titled Why Are Health Disparities Everyone's Problem? (2021).

Recognized with several honors, Cooper is a Member of the National Academy of Medicine since 2008 and a Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation since 2007. They also hold membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race

    Lisa A. Cooper;Debra L. Roter;Rachel L. Johnson;Daniel E. Ford

  • Race and trust in the health care system.

    L. Ebony Boulware;L. Ebony Boulware;Lisa A. Cooper;Lisa A. Cooper;Lloyd E. Ratner;Thomas A. LaVeist

  • Cultural Competence: A Systematic Review of Health Care Provider Educational Interventions

    Mary Catherine Beach;Eboni G. Price;Tiffany L. Gary;Karen A. Robinson

  • Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits

    Rachel L. Johnson;Debra Roter;Neil R. Powe;Lisa A. Cooper

  • The acceptability of treatment for depression among African-American, Hispanic, and white primary care patients

    Lisa A. Cooper;Junius J. Gonzales;Joseph J. Gallo;Kathryn M. Rost

  • The Associations of Clinicians’ Implicit Attitudes About Race With Medical Visit Communication and Patient Ratings of Interpersonal Care

    Lisa A. Cooper;Debra L. Roter;Kathryn A. Carson;Mary Catherine Beach

  • Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality.

    Somnath Saha;Mary Catherine Beach;Lisa A. Cooper

  • Patient-Physician Relationships and Racial Disparities in the Quality of Health Care

    Somnath Saha;Jose J. Arbelaez;Lisa A. Cooper

  • Understanding Concordance in Patient-Physician Relationships: Personal and Ethnic Dimensions of Shared Identity

    Richard L. Street;Kimberly J. O'Malley;Lisa A. Cooper;Paul Haidet

  • Racial and ethnic differences in patient perceptions of bias and cultural competence in health care.

    Rachel L. Johnson;Somnath Saha;Jose J. Arbelaez;Mary Catherine Beach

  • Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study.

    Thomas K. Houston;Lisa A. Cooper;Daniel E. Ford

  • Designing and Evaluating Interventions to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care

    Lisa A. Cooper;Martha N. Hill;Neil R. Powe

  • Ethnicity and preferences for depression treatment.

    Jane L. Givens;Thomas K. Houston;Thomas K. Houston;Benjamin W. Van Voorhees;Daniel E. Ford;Daniel E. Ford

  • Disparities in Care for Depression Among Primary Care Patients

    Jeanne Miranda;Lisa A Cooper

  • Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action

    David R. Williams;Lisa A. Cooper

  • Do Patients Treated With Dignity Report Higher Satisfaction, Adherence, and Receipt of Preventive Care?

    Mary Catherine Beach;Jeremy Sugarman;Rachel L. Johnson;Jose J. Arbelaez

  • Chronic medical illness, depression, and use of acute medical services among Medicare beneficiaries.

    Seth Himelhoch;Wendy E. Weller;Albert W. Wu;Gerard F. Anderson

  • The Role of Cultural Diversity Climate in Recruitment, Promotion, and Retention of Faculty in Academic Medicine

    Eboni G. Price;Aysegul Gozu;David E. Kern;Neil R. Powe

  • Association of Unconscious Race and Social Class Bias With Vignette-Based Clinical Assessments by Medical Students

    Adil H. Haider;Janel Sexton;N. Sriram;Lisa A. Cooper

  • COVID-19 and Health Equity-A New Kind of "Herd Immunity".

    David R. Williams;Lisa A. Cooper;Lisa A. Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Catherine Beach
Mary Catherine Beach Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Debra L. Roter
Debra L. Roter Johns Hopkins University
Neil R. Powe
Neil R. Powe University of California, San Francisco
Daniel E. Ford
Daniel E. Ford Johns Hopkins University
Adil H. Haider
Adil H. Haider Brigham and Women's Hospital
Edgar R. Miller
Edgar R. Miller Johns Hopkins University
Sherita Hill Golden
Sherita Hill Golden Johns Hopkins University
Jeanne M. Clark
Jeanne M. Clark Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Rebecca F. Gottesman
Rebecca F. Gottesman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career can take many forms, and not all require attending traditional medical school. There are a variety of online bachelor's in nutrition programs designed for those passionate about dietary science and public health. These flexible degree options open doors to roles such as nutritionist or health educator.

For those aiming for leadership within healthcare, pursuing online mha programs cahme accredited can help develop essential management and policy skills. These accredited programs are ideal for advancing into administrative or executive healthcare roles.

Nurses looking to expand their qualifications efficiently may benefit from the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These streamlined pathways are perfect for working professionals needing a flexible schedule and a direct route to a bachelor’s degree.

Advanced nursing professionals might also consider the 1 year dnp program online, which allows for rapid completion of the highest level of clinical nursing education. These online opportunities make it easier to balance career advancement with existing work and family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa A. Cooper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles